Posted on 03/02/2007 8:40:17 AM PST by areafiftyone
I'm not talking about whatever you say my words are; I'm talking about why you think you have to speak for Jim Robinson.
I'm sure you don't want Howlin to leave. I know I sure don't.
Really? The preservation of the constitution means so little? Perhaps that's why we've lost so much of it in the last several decades.
It's an open forum, onyx. Unless you can point out the forum rule where we cannot post to certain responses.
I think you just don't like the fact that the FR mission statement apparently isn't up for revision in order to support Rudy. I posted the necessary revisions earlier and you for some reason didn't have any comment.
I'm speaking for myself. JimRob stated where he sees FR going. I'm applying that to your claim that pro-lifers and gun-righters were a foot on your neck.
Beg to differ. Here's your post from earlier today.
To: BigSkyFreeperYou left your house. You told many of us on FR time and time again that you're no longer a member of the GOP.109 posted on 03/02/2007 10:43:00 AM CST by BigSkyFreeper
Did you post the above, or not, liar?
The actual facts, for anyone observing who gives a rip:
I posted ONCE on FR that I was leaving the GOP.
Why?
Because I was standing in front of the hospice in Pinellas Park, FL, watching Terri Schiavo's parents and brother and sister come out several times a day from having to see a pipsqueak local judge dehydrate their loved one to death, while the Republican Governor, Jeb Bush, and the rest of the Republican Party paid lip service but did NOTHING.
Because, in desperation to find ANYTHING that would help this poor defenseless young woman and her family, I let my emotions get the better of me for about five minutes.
So, BSf, shut up. Just because you and your harpie friends have reposted my post five hundred times on FR doesn't mean that I have "told many of us on FR time and time again that [I'm] no longer a member of the GOP."
Jerk.
131 posted on 03/02/2007 11:15:28 AM MST by EternalVigilance ("Liberalism": Now in two delicious Party Flavors!)
Those are YOUR words.
Good. Annoying and irritating liberals is a worthwhile goal in itself.
You mean this?
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.
Just checking.
Unfortunately, it's not always that easy to do, particularly if the poster in question posts frequently.
He's a proven liar. Time after time, yet comes in here passing judgments on everyone like he's "Superconservative Man"; promoting truth, justice and the American way!
I'll ask you again, who the hell do you think you are answering for Jim?
Totally and absolutely!
Of course they're my words, which you misrepresented once again.
LOL How? By linking to them?
Besides continuing to champion the defense of America, FR just might become the "Conservative Conscience of the Republican Party," ie, we may become a real thorn in the side of moderate/liberal Republicanism. Someone has to try defend the party from completely tossing out traditional American conservatism. Might as well be us.
Perhaps you could point it out to me between your harangues at me. "of the Repubican Party" clearly implies remaining part of the party - even if certain elements find that to be a nuisance towards their agenda of moderate conservatism.
I think the larger point is how those who wish to drag the party further left view FR's position. I haven't seen Rudy boosters prevented from promoting their candidate so far on FR.
No. By not-that-cleverly lying about them.
It's NOT your discussion or mine.
Howlin asked the question.
I never lied, I lost count of the times you said you were leaving, or had left.
So I am one of those "undecided voters" for the next few months waiting to see who is going to step up to the plate re the WOT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.