Skip to comments.
Glitch Around 2PM Caused [delay in reporting of] Dow Jones Drop 200 Points In Short Time Around 3PM
Nasdaq.com ^
| 2/27/07
Posted on 02/27/2007 2:30:46 PM PST by Junior_G
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: Mo1
What the heck do they mean by a "glitch"?No idea. I don't know much about the technical processes at NYSE. The best case scenario in my mind is that there were a lot of sell orders that got backlogged and then all went through at once. Other than that, maybe there are usually artificial controls in place that failed (I hope that's not how it works over there), or that the plunge is somehow artificial (the most frightening scenario).
21
posted on
02/27/2007 2:44:09 PM PST
by
Junior_G
To: Junior_G
Chinese man to stockbroker: "What do you mean portfolio just lost 10%? How can this happen?"
Stockbroker shrugs and says, "Fluctuations."
Chinese man says "Fluctu Americans too! You down 400!"
22
posted on
02/27/2007 2:44:36 PM PST
by
Sender
("Great powers should never get involved in the politics of small tribes.")
To: Junior_G
Glitch around 2 PM caused Dow Jones to drop 200 points in short time...
Translation:
NYSE Specialist decided to stop buying shares from the public because they already bought too many, if they were going to be forced to buy more, it was going to be on their terms. Which was low enough so they could average their cost and sell into the rally.
23
posted on
02/27/2007 2:44:48 PM PST
by
be4everfree
(Liberals are "Thick as a Brick" ......JT)
To: Junior_G
Al Bore says it's all due to global warming!!
Hillarity says that as the smartest person in the world she alone knows how to fix this.
Obama says he would never play the "race card" but that it's obvious the honkies who run Wall St. just need enough brothers to show them how to "bring it".......
24
posted on
02/27/2007 2:44:49 PM PST
by
Enchante
(Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
To: RDTF; Mo1
Mo1, see RDTF's post #18. It was the first of my three suggested scenarios.
25
posted on
02/27/2007 2:45:18 PM PST
by
Junior_G
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: RegulatorCountry
Lol....if it's not on paper then it never happened!
To: RDTF
".....but it did cause the drop to register far more quickly than it otherwise would have."
Hmmmm, so "real time" really isn't.
I wonder WHY they have a delay at all?
Who what benefit from that?
Follow da money.
28
posted on
02/27/2007 2:49:56 PM PST
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: Junior_G
Yet another reason why I'm glad I quit daytrading.
29
posted on
02/27/2007 2:50:25 PM PST
by
Reagan is King
(Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it)
To: RDTF
Did you read the comments that followed on your link?
"good, its about time! I guess Bushs last hiding place is being destroyed. Now he cant even brag about the stock market, boo hoo!"
On a Wall Street Journal site. Geez.
30
posted on
02/27/2007 2:51:05 PM PST
by
M. Thatcher
("Rudy has chosen to be a public sinner." – narses 2/25/07)
To: Junior_G
"We, uh, we fixed the glitch so he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore. So it'll just work itself out naturally."
31
posted on
02/27/2007 2:51:24 PM PST
by
Xenalyte
(Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
To: bnelson44
"It happened, but it didn't really happen,"
Kerry was involved!
32
posted on
02/27/2007 2:51:37 PM PST
by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
To: Junior_G
This is what happens when you elect Liberal's. Gas goes up. stocks go down.
33
posted on
02/27/2007 2:52:00 PM PST
by
Brimack34
(Rino's need not apply)
To: Brimack34; Dog Gone; xcamel; kc8ukw; petercooper; SierraWasp; Grampa Dave
Yep,....that's a real glitch...
34
posted on
02/27/2007 2:55:50 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
To: Junior_G
Wonder if they were loading new software...
To: M. Thatcher
Geez is right. Unbelievable
36
posted on
02/27/2007 3:03:12 PM PST
by
RDTF
(They should have put down Barbarella instead of Barbaro)
To: RDTF
More proof...they walk among us.
37
posted on
02/27/2007 3:05:32 PM PST
by
M. Thatcher
("Rudy has chosen to be a public sinner." – narses 2/25/07)
To: Cultural Realm
In a "416 point" drop, the number "416" whether historically high or low is irrelevant.
The relevant number is what % of the market total before the drop does "416" points represent.
I think it is something in the neighborhood of 3 - 3.3% Even 1 "500 point" drop represents 4%.
I think either number will be seen as a "correction" to the climb the DOW has been making for many months. In the past six months alone, one portfolio of balanced fund invstments has risen more than 8% and twice than on the year. And, I am sure that not all of them will be included in the current "correction".
38
posted on
02/27/2007 3:09:42 PM PST
by
Wuli
To: GalaxieFiveHundred; Dog Gone; Junior_G
Just watching Foxnews Special Report and there was mention of some software problems with a program that is involved with a running calculation of the Dow Jones avg.....
39
posted on
02/27/2007 3:10:49 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
To: Junior_G
40
posted on
02/27/2007 3:16:05 PM PST
by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson