Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US generals ‘will quit’ if Bush orders Iran attack
The Sunday Times (U.K.) ^ | 02/25/07 | Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter

Posted on 02/24/2007 4:37:37 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-267 next last
To: billbears
Are you telling us that "WALL STREET" ( in the generic sense of that term ) makes American policy?

ROTFLMSOPIMP

181 posted on 02/24/2007 9:01:47 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
This is the lamest story I've read in a while.

Perhaps some of the most gayest quotes from an unnamed source as I've ever read.

182 posted on 02/24/2007 9:04:21 PM PST by FreeReign (Still waiting for the best conservative candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
"Name them!"

That's what I say. Do your duty or resign, or get ready for your new assignment; guarding a sh!thouse in the Arctic Circle.
183 posted on 02/24/2007 9:09:47 PM PST by DesScorp (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jude24
" he would have no legal basis under the UN Charter to invade"

The UN is a fart in the wind, only recognized by other farts in the wind.

184 posted on 02/24/2007 9:15:44 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

ROTFLMSOPIMP?


185 posted on 02/24/2007 9:20:03 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I'm guessing that "LMSO" is a cleaned-up version of "LMAO".


186 posted on 02/24/2007 9:21:19 PM PST by RichInOC ("Out! Out!"--St. Dogbert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I think this time is all about bluffing and Iran will be succesful in calling our bluff.............JUST DO THE BOMBING OF THE IRANIAN NUKE SITES AMONG OTHERS AND BE DONE WITH IT!!
187 posted on 02/24/2007 9:27:47 PM PST by yield 2 the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Yes, it's "laughing my socks off"; I don't do "dirty", not even in just initials.


188 posted on 02/24/2007 9:43:59 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

OK girl, but I'm sure that you don't PIYP either.


189 posted on 02/24/2007 9:46:29 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

The President would have to fly the bombing missions himself to avoid leaks.


190 posted on 02/24/2007 9:51:33 PM PST by Brimack34 (Rino's need not apply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

No, I don't, but that's the phrase and I couldn't figure out how to change that part of it.


191 posted on 02/24/2007 10:07:17 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
The threat of a wave of resignations coincided with a warning by Vice-President Dick Cheney that all options, including military action, remained on the table. He was responding to a comment by Tony Blair that it would not “be right to take military action against Iran”.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

192 posted on 02/24/2007 10:28:34 PM PST by Parrot_was_devastating
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Of course, a method to mislead the Iranians as to our real intentions would be part of the strategy.


193 posted on 02/24/2007 10:56:03 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

"It might also be known that while we may not have many available troops, we have more than enough bombs to turn the country of Iran into a smoking hole."

I don't think anyone doubts this. What I found doubtful is if the administration is so dismissive as some are of the varied things Iran *might* be able to do to screw with our (and for that matter the world) economy, including whatever capability they have in the straits of hormuz, terror cells operating in the US, and any number of other unpleasant things they have doubtless already considered. I know there are some here who say some or all of this is impossible or unimportant, but I don't think the administration, aside from the legal and political angle, wants to put the debt-laden (consumer and government) US economy into a tailspin with xxx$ oil and who knows what other items might occur. Unlike bloggers, the executive branch is actually responsible for consequences like this.

In other words, consequences work both ways, and it is hard to imagine Iran not doing everything in its power to bite back where it will hurt the most.


194 posted on 02/24/2007 11:02:57 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah; tjd1454

his points about oil price spirals are spot on, and he didn't mention the possibility that sympathetic regimes (specifically venezuela) might shut off sales to the US as well.

the consequences of oil doubling or tripling from here would be quite bad for our economy as well as pretty much everyone else's.


195 posted on 02/24/2007 11:13:31 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
...according to highly placed defence and intelligence sources.

Let's see some names.

196 posted on 02/25/2007 2:40:15 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

"socks"


197 posted on 02/25/2007 4:51:50 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

"party dress"


198 posted on 02/25/2007 4:52:45 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123; tjd1454

The Strait of Hormuz can be cleared in under 15 minutes while central Tehran and the nuclear facilities will take 25 or 30 years.


199 posted on 02/25/2007 4:54:48 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: gondramB; jude24
Philosophically speaking, it seems to me that Congress' power to Declare War necessarily implies the power to rescind such Declaration. Congress can rescind any Law it passes.

Practically speaking, Congress' power over the Purse means that they can formally cause a President to desist from any military action the instant they so legislate. The President cannot spend one dime that Congress does not approve. No money, no military action.

200 posted on 02/25/2007 4:55:27 AM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-267 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson