Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lust for Height [Mile-high skyscraper coming?]
American.com ^ | February 23, 2007 | By Philip Nobel

Posted on 02/24/2007 7:17:13 AM PST by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2007 7:17:15 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I can think of several large buildings in downtown Denver that already qualify.


2 posted on 02/24/2007 7:20:03 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

Even some small buildings in Denver should qualify.


3 posted on 02/24/2007 7:22:17 AM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

4 posted on 02/24/2007 7:24:03 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

I saw a special about one on plan that would be a city. There was shopping, recreation, a school, apartments and offices in the same building.


5 posted on 02/24/2007 7:25:27 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

The Tower of Babel is the first thing that comes to mind.


6 posted on 02/24/2007 7:25:28 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Now we know why fanatics crashed into the WTC they wanted to be to say hey lookey here ours is bigger then yours?
7 posted on 02/24/2007 7:29:32 AM PST by Shots (Loose Lips sink ships.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Mile-high skyscraper coming?

Science.engineering question of the day:

If the WTC towers took 10 to 11 seconds to collapse, how long would it take for a mile high tower to collapse to the ground?

The temptation will the there (for the terrorists). It's like a mountain for mountain climbers or a bank for bank robbers or a jumbo-jet for skyjackers..
8 posted on 02/24/2007 7:37:08 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno
will the there s/b will be there
9 posted on 02/24/2007 7:38:38 AM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

http://ryugyonghotel.com/


10 posted on 02/24/2007 7:38:51 AM PST by mkjessup (If Reagan were still with us, he'd ask us to "win one more for the Gipper, vote for Duncan Hunter!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adorno
If the WTC towers took 10 to 11 seconds to collapse, how long would it take for a mile high tower to collapse to the ground?

Faster than the speed of sound if physics challenged conspiracy theorists get their way.
11 posted on 02/24/2007 7:39:56 AM PST by cripplecreek (Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
SkyScraper Page
12 posted on 02/24/2007 7:42:37 AM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
>bad image link [damn it -- sorry!]


13 posted on 02/24/2007 7:42:54 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Could an article about engineers and building height have been written with any more dramatic hyperbole? How many partagraphs did it go on about how the engineer who proposed a mile high building WASN'T subdued and dragged off to a looney bin?


14 posted on 02/24/2007 7:50:11 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

If you want to see an exploding skyline, check out Miami Beach over the next decade. They are going to be tripling their skyscrapers during that period.


15 posted on 02/24/2007 7:53:47 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I'm 26 days from outliving Steve Irwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I think skyscrapers are the perfect answer to suburban sprawl. Instead of "spreading the city" into the suburbs, keep the city the city.

Let's take Manhattan for example. I just see that skyline getting more and more massive. It will get to the point where people can live their entire lives many stories off the ground. Imagine at the 50-story level, having all the skyscrapers in Manhattan connected by pedestrian bridges (fully enclosed from the weather) making it possible to walk up and down Manhattan at the 50-story level. Eventually, public transportation will be built at that level so that you have "skyways" (instead of "subways") rumbling through the city 50 stories high! Eventually, it will be feasible to have highways up there as well so that commuters (and taxicabs) from Brooklyn will be able to climb an elevated roadway in their automobiles to the 50-story level and get just about anywhere without causing mass confusion on the streets below.

Imagine having an elevated loop around Manhattan at the 50-story level for automobile traffic. The streets below will no longer be choked with automobiles, making the streets of Manhattan more pedestrian friendly.

This is possible!

Eventually, as the city continues to grow, you will have the same thing at the 100-story level. So Manhattan will effectively triple its capacity for traffic!

At the 100-story level, it will be possible to have a massive "roof" over the city. You will be able to put parks up there and jogging trails and baseball stadiums and shopping malls and such. All supported by the massive skyscrapers embedded in the bedrock below. Obviously there will have to be large gaps in this roof to allow for sunshine to reach the levels below. One idea I have is to have retractable roofs for the upper level so that when it rains, you can close these gaps and keep the streets below dry. Also, you will be able to collect this rainwater, purify it and use it to supply the city with running water.

16 posted on 02/24/2007 8:06:34 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I'm 26 days from outliving Steve Irwin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

It sounds possible and a nice place to visit but....no thanks. That would be just too many people around.


17 posted on 02/24/2007 8:11:52 AM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: adorno

Another engineering question . . .

What would 200-300 mph winds do to such buildings?

or

a magnitude 10 or so quake?

= = = =

Given that Scripture says every mountain and island will be displaced . . . could be interesting.


18 posted on 02/24/2007 8:25:59 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

Part of my univ library Special Collections Dept charge was a wonderful book with all the plans and discussion of that FLW building. Beautiful. Designed for Chicago, as I recall.


19 posted on 02/24/2007 8:30:29 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS WORTHY; GOD ALONE PAID THE PRICE; GOD ALONE IS ABLE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Shots
Now we know why fanatics crashed into the WTC they wanted to be to say hey lookey here ours is bigger then yours?

They just know that an angry mob of Christians won't be high-jacking planes and flying them into those buildings.

20 posted on 02/24/2007 8:31:06 AM PST by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson