Posted on 02/20/2007 2:31:57 AM PST by Man50D
Has nothing to do with any transcript. You're blowing smoke.
Sure. You simply can't explain where, why, how, etc.
Read the posts above; there is no doubt.
Sorry, I thought you had a point . . . not someone else.
Thanks for bumping the thread; you look like an idiot, but it helps anyway.
Not in this case. The judge not only disallowed any mention of his criminal past, but also put a gag order on the attorneys and families of the defendants, barring them from discussing it in public. Few people are aware of the lengths to which Johnny Sutton and the judge in this case went to ensure a conviction.
I hope these good men get pardoned very soon.
And Sutton along with all the others responsible for this miscarriage of justice nned to be brought up on charges.
What??? These brilliant supervisors didn't think to ask any questions, like "hey man, what happened?" --- get real.
To put it another way, those up the chain of command were not told and those down the chain of command were told.
Nonsense --- the supervisors were on the scene and it was their responsibility to get all information and file the report if they deemed it necessary.
"I can't wait to see how you benefited in all this, but you must have, or you would not be here deceiving."
-----
Isn't it amazing how much damage that globalist elitism has done to America and its system of values, to say nothing of its soverignty?
He,he,he!!!!!!!
The prosecutors have a bad habit. Does this remind you of any other thread?
Verdict Reversal for Ex-Border Patrol Agent[South Texas]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1775676/posts
Read the transcript.
You and me both.
"Isn't it amazing how much damage that globalist elitism has done to America and its system of values, to say nothing of its soverignty?"
And you and I are financing this globalist crap!
What report was filled out that was false?
Time to back up your statement. (HINT: There was NO False Report)
And you and I are financing this globalist crap!
----
Yes, and without our permission or vote.
Where have you been. There was no false report. There was no written report at all. They made a verbal report to the supervisors who were on the scene and the supervisors chose not to make a written report.
If he had admitted to the shooting, he would have had to make more reports on that.
His drug seizure report was false and an unfiled report on the shooting is a false report.
Drug seizure reports are for just that--the drug seizure. They do not include reports of shootings, as evidenced by Richards' testimony.
When you read the article at the top of this thread, are they all lying about the reports?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.