Skip to comments.
Dad wasn't dad after all, but still owes child support
Christian Science Monitor ^
| Warren Richey
Posted on 02/10/2007 7:19:53 PM PST by ellery
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-453 next last
I'm torn. On one hand, people shouldn't have to pay child support for children that aren't theirs. On the other, I think my priority in such awful circumstances would be to make sure my 3-year-old child couldn't be taken away from me merely because I wasn't genetically related to him. I believe I would be looking to legally bind me to my child, not to legally unbind me from him b/c of mere genetics.
1
posted on
02/10/2007 7:19:57 PM PST
by
ellery
To: ellery
I think I would be suing the mother for fraud and lover boy for child support reimbursment.
To: ellery
So what should men do now?Insist on DNA testing of your children at birth?It may well come to that if you don't want to get hosed by a unfaithful wife and her lover.
3
posted on
02/10/2007 7:24:42 PM PST
by
Farmer Dean
(Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
To: ellery
White men are the lowest class of life in America today. I live the nightmare every day. $800 a month child support to see my son four days a month. The ex screwed around, and I'm the bad guy.
Welcome to Amerika.
4
posted on
02/10/2007 7:25:44 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: ellery
Watch for the stampede of men that hate their ex wives that will start calling names, and bitchin' and moaning about their child support obligations, and how hard their lives are because of it....
5
posted on
02/10/2007 7:26:18 PM PST
by
justche
(Freedom and Security go together - Ronald Reagan)
To: ellery
I'm glad my kid looks just like me.
6
posted on
02/10/2007 7:27:28 PM PST
by
o-n-money
To: ellery
Parker must continue to pay $1,200 a month in child support because he had missed the one-year postdivorce deadline for filing his lawsuit.Holy crap!
How much does the father have to pay?
To: ellery
I see a federal lawsuit in the near future.
8
posted on
02/10/2007 7:27:45 PM PST
by
Founding Father
(The Pedophile moHAMmudd (PBUH---Pigblood be upon him))
To: ellery
Dad wasn't dad after all, but still owes child support
IIRC, the policy of the Los Angeles DA has been that if a fellow
gets a default judgement of paternity, he's finished.
Doesn't matter if he's been deployed overseas, recooping
in the hospital, etc., causing him to fail to respond.
Or even cause him to not know a legal proceeding has been convened
against him.
That's the bitter fruit of a broken socialist system (yes, that's
redundant)...it gets so desparate for $$$ to keep their Ponzi schemes
afloat, they don't care if innocents are forced to pony up money.
Even if a DNA test shows the poor fellow isn't Papa.
Justice is the last thing on their minds.
As long as there is a legal proceeding with appeal processes,
I'll go along with getting dead-beat parents to pony up.
But forcing guys that aren't even parents to pay?
That's not justice.
9
posted on
02/10/2007 7:28:24 PM PST
by
VOA
To: ellery
We recognize that the former husband in this case may feel victimized,
Wow, Justice Kenneth Bell, you are a complete idiot.
10
posted on
02/10/2007 7:28:52 PM PST
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: o-n-money
I'm glad my kid looks just like me.
__________________________________________
So does the other guy.
//Extreme Sarcasm//
11
posted on
02/10/2007 7:30:16 PM PST
by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: ellery
How is it that the biological father is allowed to skate? Why isn't he responsible for $1,200 a month in support?
12
posted on
02/10/2007 7:31:38 PM PST
by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: Farmer Dean
Insist on DNA testing of your children at birth?There was a bill in the California legislature that called for mandatory DNA testing at birth. I'm pretty sure it died, but men (and boys, unfortunately) are becoming more aware of the need for it. I've read figures of 6-10% of kids born are not the named father's kids.
13
posted on
02/10/2007 7:32:49 PM PST
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: Farmer Dean
DNA testing may well become more routine. I have seen reports that a significant percentage of children born to married women are father by someone other than the husband.
Also, nearly half the children born in America today are to unmarried women and the percentage of deceived men among the unmarried couples is almost certainly very high.
Of course, the best advice remains, as always: Marry a woman of high character.
14
posted on
02/10/2007 7:33:45 PM PST
by
iowamark
To: ellery
Where's that story where the divorced father paid child support and found out when the daughter would have turned 18 that she had actually died in 1993 but nobody (not the State of California, not the State of Texas or, God forbid, not the mother) bothered to tell him this while they stole his wages and cashed his checks all those years?
Face it guys, you're just an ATM to them. Nothing more. You have no rights.
"While we recognize the man may feel victimized," says the State of Florida, "tough sh!t."
15
posted on
02/10/2007 7:34:44 PM PST
by
Tall_Texan
(NO McCain, Rudy, Romney, Hillary, Kerry, Obama or Gore in 2008!)
To: andyk
How is it that the biological father is allowed to skate? Why isn't he responsible for $1,200 a month in support? Because the husband is more likely to be employed than the boyfriend
16
posted on
02/10/2007 7:35:16 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(Never try to teach a pig to sing -- it wastes your time and it annoys the pig)
To: andyk
How is it that the biological father is allowed to skate? Why isn't he responsible for $1,200 a month in support?Well, he was never married to the bitch. You see, marriage in these cases is like putting a gun up to your own head.
17
posted on
02/10/2007 7:35:39 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: justche
Watch for the stampede of men that hate their ex wives that will start calling names, and bitchin' and moaning about their child support obligations, and how hard their lives are because of it....Wow. You really are one bitter broad, aren't you?
18
posted on
02/10/2007 7:37:15 PM PST
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: ellery
Another reason to never marry.
Why does the non-father have to pay? Why does the biological father walk away scott free?
Go after HIM for child support. The law should be rewritten to go after the cheaters, both of them, not the innocent.
If it were me, I'd find a very creative lawyer who'd be willing to test the waters and go after the biological father.
And yes, I believe dna tests should now be standard, and attached to the birth certificate. I hate the idea, but I'd rather have that safeguard than not.
19
posted on
02/10/2007 7:37:25 PM PST
by
ByDesign
To: ellery
Another reason to never marry.
Why does the non-father have to pay? Why does the biological father walk away scott free?
Go after HIM for child support. The law should be rewritten to go after the cheaters, both of them, not the innocent.
If it were me, I'd find a very creative lawyer who'd be willing to test the waters and go after the biological father.
And yes, I believe dna tests should now be standard, and attached to the birth certificate. I hate the idea, but I'd rather have that safeguard than not.
20
posted on
02/10/2007 7:37:33 PM PST
by
ByDesign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-453 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson