Posted on 02/07/2007 7:26:24 PM PST by kristinn
Thank you for covering the trial for us. Brian Williams said Timmy's testimony wasn't challenged like the other reporters. Brian seemed triumphant. Williams will have Tim on Nightly News after his testimony is finished, perhaps tomorrow night. I'll be comparing their account with yours, and yours wins.
Russert says he had one meeting with the FBI and they say they had 2, right? And Russert said that got it wrong, which, I have read, is what ALL the press is saying.
Interesting.
I don't the answers to those questions off the top of my head. I'm getting tired so I'm off to bed. I just read the NY Times account and they buried the fun stuff, naturally.
Very, very good and appreciated!
Exactly which court is this?
Great post! Thanks for being our eyes and ears in this courtroom where a good man is being harrassed, abused and unjustly victimized by Fitzgerald.
From your fabulous notes:
Wells pointed out that Russert spoke about the conversation with Libby with the FBI agent without even verifying that the man on the phone was indeed an FBI agent or whether Libby had indeed waived confidentiality on the conversation.
Russert tried to weasel out of it by saying he considered Libby's phone call a "viewer complaint" about Hardball's coverage of the Joe Wilson story and that he had only told the agent his side of the conversation because the agent told him Libby was saying Russert told him about Plame.
Wells hammered home that Russert had not included this conversation with a government agent in his affidavit--raising the possibility that Russert filed a false affidavit with the court.
By this point Fitzgerald was slouched in his chair, intently staring at the jury to gauge their reaction to his star witness getting methodically taken apart.
------
Thanks, Kristinn. Great reporting. Russert caught lying has made my day complete.
I guess most viewers have Russerts personal phone number?
I hope Wells drags this lie around the court room nice and slow for all to see, and then makes Russert eat it.
Sounds to me like Russert could have a rough day tomorrow.
You watch Brian Williams??? I feel your pain.
Previous foot in mouth incident. don't know if it will clear up, or..uh, can't recall if it will get better.
Great job Kristinn!! Way to go Mr. Wells!!
I'm surprised he didn't go in there with a white cane and a seeing eye dog.
Thanks. You're the best. Without your reporting I'd never know just how effective Wells was in defending Libby.
But, lawyers file motions to "quash" subpoenas, not "squash" them.
This is by far the best account I've read anywhere. Not a good day for Russert, and maybe tomorrow will be even worse. And all this after breaking his ankle by tripping over his dog. February, "the cruel month," or is that April.
What kind of a "church group" goes on tours like that?
I was thinking of exactly that today when I read that Russert said they saw Wilson's op-ed on an advance wire and had him on the same day it appeared in the paper. I have thought from the beginning that this was an orchestrated effort.
I don't know how it can be reported that Russert did well. His memory, his journalistic integrity and his lack of inquisitiveness were all questioned without reasonable explanation from Russert. And on top of that, Russert disagreed not only with Cheney but with the FBI notes. Those are a lot of body blows...I can't wait to see where Wells goes with this tomorrow.
--Wells answered, with Russert watching from next to the witness box where he was leaning on his crutch--
I believe that's a typo - it should say CROTCH, not crutch ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.