Skip to comments.Rudy’s a No-Go
Posted on 02/06/2007 10:43:27 AM PST by ElkGroveDan
click here to read article
So, I would advise the more secular minded members of the G.O.P. to nominate a candidate amenable to the CR. Do otherwise and the more secular minded members of the G.O.P. will be responsible for President Hillary Rodham Clinton.
What Rudy says, and what he does, are two entirely different things.
LOL. That's why I said I wasn't sure if it was accurate. Heck, I might even vote for him too. I don't know enough yet. But on H&C last night, he came across as being more conservative than his previous stances would indicate. What he's done in the past is more important to me than what he says he will do in the future, simply because anyone can say anything. That's the easy part.
...and if Arnold hadn't won, it would definately be much worse!! Cruz Bustamante or Phil Angiledes? Remember them???
"It's about CORE values, and Rudy is nowhere near the real Republican core values."
So let's just stay home like we did last November and hand not only the House and Senate BACK to the Socialists but suffer another Clinton administration for 8 years.
Yeah, we'll teach them like we did in 1992 and 1996.
If Duncan Hunter could beat Hillary by winning the Primaries great, I'll vote for him. At this point I'll vote for anyone who has a chance at beating her. The moderates will vote for Rudy and that could be the turning point.
That is your opinion.
Like I said, right now I am working hard for Duncan Hunter, but I if Rudy wins the nomination, I will vote for him.
Count me as another vote for Rudy. If McCain wins the primary, I'm voting 3rd party.
Realistically, for a president to actually review 1% of what he's responsible for would be a Herculean undertaking. That (among other things) was the downfall of Bill Clinton. He surrounded himself with a bunch of people that were as amoral and corrupt as himself, and he largely destroyed the prestige of the office.
I think that Rudy understands how to act like a leader (seeing him after 9-11 proved that). I'm not sure about the other two pieces of the puzzle yet - that'll come out in the campaign.
Hmmmmm, now that's an idea worth pondering.
and remember that the conservative candidate was shouted down by the (R)nold fans saying he could never win?
So instead of riding a wave of revolt with a more conservative candidate, the rino lovers declared their candidate the only one that could win, shouted down the conservatives, and ended up electing someoe who is more liberal than they ever admitted he would be, and closer to a liberal than a conservative.
Look at everything Rnold has done and proposed. Expect WORSE with a bald faced RINO like rudy.
I swear every RINO lover must have french ancestry. They all want to surrender before any fighting begins.
HANNITY: There's a misconception that you support a partial birth abortion.
GIULIANI: If it doesn't have provision for the mother I wouldn't support the legislation. If it has provision for the life of the mother I would support
Think that pretty well puts that "he doesn't support PBA" to rest.
The link to the transcript is here
Calling all of the "all or nothing Conservatives" out there.
Rudy Giuliani is not a viable national candidate.
I'm very curious as to why you feel the former acceptable and not the latter.
Perhaps you don't live in California. I do. There was NO WAY that McClintock could have won in this state. NO way!!!
I don't love everything Arnold has done, not by a long shot, but he's still better than the two democrats.
Such a position puts you out of the electorate permanently, because the Constitution requires the candidate for president to be a Human Being.
I will support someone like Mitch McConnell or maybe Hunter in the primary, but I will vote for the GOP winner of the primary, either because I can support them, or if not, in order to offset at least one God-hating, USA-hating moonbat.
South Dakota passed an abortion ban, which failed, but they're working on passing another one.
Utah is also working to pass an abortion ban.
Dozens of states have concealed-carry.
Conclusion: A President has no impact on social policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.