Wash. initiative would require married couples to have kids

King 5 News ^ | 02:34 PM PST on Monday, February 5, 2007 | KING5.com Staff

[Sopater]

What the ...?

[elcid1970]

So who says gays don't hate straight people in general and women in particular?

Don't they just love calling straights "breeders"?

Gays hurl "breeder" as an insult. I don't think that it is.

[geopyg]

Oh yes - I'm soooooo proud of my state.

By the way, if I wanted to, I could get an iniative started in the People's Republic of Washington to mandate that every new-born have the middle name of "Freeper".

Sayyyyy!

[ishabibble]

Just from the vague headline, I knew this was about the homosexuals. They really are a bunch of rotters...

[muawiyah]

Wonder how the gay guys would like to have an initiative on the ballot that reqyures each one of them to use his penis for breeding purposes regulary or suffer amputation of the otherwise "useless" member.

[Cementjungle]

My wife and I just adopted a new kitten. Does that count?

[ConservaTexan]

Gregory 'Goesdown' is just an uppity flamer looking to cause troubles for heteros any way he can.

[Peach]

Just wait. This will fail. This time.

But when President Hillary gets in and appoints HER judges, watch out.

[knarf]

I was trying to think of something to say ... but I think you've replied as succinctly as can be to this .... this ..... words fail me.

[JustaDumbBlonde]

I'm down here in Louisiana, so I have to ask. Is there something in the mist that comes in off of the Pacific that infects people with liberalism and craziness? (Apparently you're okay though.)

[geopyg]

Part of it may be the southerly winds that brings the Californians up here!

[geopyg]

However, in my State's defense - OUR court did uphold OUR law that bans gay marriage.

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

Sounds like something Hitler would have come up with....

[Peach]

For a little laugh, check out the first few sentences of this article.

[andy58-in-nh]

Why doesn't someone file a bill to require the same thing of gay "couples" - they need to have a child within three years or face annulment. What's that? Gay couples can't create a child? Well then, their relationship cannot by definition be said to be a "marriage". If you want to discuss the concept of "civil unions", fine, because there just might be some societal value in that (for example, in moving Gays away from the bathhouse culture and toward something resembling personal responsibility). But don't call it "marriage" - it isn't and never will be and no amount of guerrilla legislation will ever change that reality.

[Mr. Brightside]

Bring it on.

[Mo1]

- An initiative filed by proponents of same-sex marriage would require heterosexual couples to have kids within three years or else have their marriage annulled.

What the heck

[CodeToad]

We should just go back to making sodomy illegal.