Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A 'Good Chance' Giuliani Will Run In '08
AP via Yahoo ^ | 02/03/07 | JIM DAVENPORT

Posted on 02/03/2007 1:17:10 PM PST by BunnySlippers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-388 next last
To: Petronski

Do you agree with Rudy Giuliani that the work of Margaret Sanger was "distinguished"?


161 posted on 02/03/2007 3:00:42 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"Rudy really knows how to make an entrance. He's one-upping Hillary to the max with his timing. :) When he declares it will be bells and whistles time."

I take it Rudy will be wearing a Christian Dior gown for the occasion.
162 posted on 02/03/2007 3:00:54 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Evie thinks that incident will be forgotten, that his "joke" will be forgotten.

No, it will not be forgotten, nor will be all of the other vile historical references that are used.

163 posted on 02/03/2007 3:01:55 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz
Trust me EV, reputation isn't something you want to challenge ANYBODY around here on.

**cough** **snort**

164 posted on 02/03/2007 3:02:32 PM PST by Petronski (Who am I and why am I here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

What is "reproductive freedom"?


165 posted on 02/03/2007 3:02:37 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: merry10; BunnySlippers

Yeah, I did. Doesn't change the fact that the post in question was intended to smear conservatives with a broad brush. In other words, her post was untrue.

Still haven't heard her, or any of the Rudyphiles, deal with the fact that their boy thinks racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger's vile "work" was "distinguished."


166 posted on 02/03/2007 3:03:14 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

That was just WAY TOO EASY!!


http://www.metacafe.com/watch/154212/rudy_giuliani_in_drag/


167 posted on 02/03/2007 3:03:23 PM PST by trumandogz (Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: BW2221

You people just can't help yourselves.


168 posted on 02/03/2007 3:03:46 PM PST by veronica (http://z8.invisionfree.com/Tears_of_a_Kloughn/index.php?act=idx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy

Do you agree with Rudy Giuliani that the work of Margaret Sanger was "distinguished"?


169 posted on 02/03/2007 3:04:42 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
That was just WAY TOO EASY!!

Simple minds like easy.

170 posted on 02/03/2007 3:04:52 PM PST by veronica (http://z8.invisionfree.com/Tears_of_a_Kloughn/index.php?act=idx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: veronica

Do you agree with Rudy Giuliani that the work of Margaret Sanger was "distinguished"?


171 posted on 02/03/2007 3:05:23 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: zbigreddogz

Do you agree with Rudy Giuliani that the work of Margaret Sanger was "distinguished"?


172 posted on 02/03/2007 3:06:24 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I wonder if they agreed with his lawsuit against guns?


173 posted on 02/03/2007 3:06:56 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I have news for you Evie, I'm pro-life. I oppose the nomination of Guiliani, and I doubt he'll get it.

Part of being pro-life, inextricably, is being anti-Nazi. That is why I do not like you.


174 posted on 02/03/2007 3:07:05 PM PST by Petronski (Who am I and why am I here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Could you repeat that?


175 posted on 02/03/2007 3:07:15 PM PST by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Let's face facts. The ONLY reason Giuliani became a Republican was to advance his career as a federal employee during the Reagan ... the ONLY reason.
176 posted on 02/03/2007 3:07:22 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
And we are adding people to the ping list everyday. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to remind folks that if they want on the Rudy for President '08 ping list they can freep mail areafiftyone.

There are at least 50 in my family, counting cousins and aunts and uncles who are not ruttin' for rudy, and that's before our annual family reunion in July. Are there more than 50 on that ping list? If there are, my family alone just canceled them out. :-)

177 posted on 02/03/2007 3:07:54 PM PST by processing please hold (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

See, you've have a point, if your charge were true. Unfortunately for you, it's not.

Glad to hear you oppose Giuliani.


178 posted on 02/03/2007 3:08:35 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: narses

I wonder if you agree with Evie's demand that Guiliani supporters be required to wear pink triangles on their clothes to label them as pro-Guiliani and pro-gay?


179 posted on 02/03/2007 3:09:13 PM PST by Petronski (Who am I and why am I here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: wireman

Nah. Not to you, since I doubt you're supporting a man who thinks racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger's work was "distinguished." ;-)


180 posted on 02/03/2007 3:09:43 PM PST by EternalVigilance (With Republicans like these, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 381-388 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson