Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ballistics data don't support charge against border agents
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 28, 2007 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 01/29/2007 2:14:21 AM PST by Man50D

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: editor-surveyor
fullyinformedjuries
41 posted on 01/29/2007 9:42:11 AM PST by Rakkasan1 ((Illegal immigrants are just undocumented friends you haven't met yet!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

I'm sorry, I missed where God came down from heaven and declared that the prosecuter lied.

Maybe you could point me to the news broadcast?

Seriously, in what way to you "know" the prosecuter "lied"?

Nothing in this story indicates a lie by the prosecuter.


42 posted on 01/29/2007 10:03:37 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
The only reason they got arrested was that the guy actually WAS hit, and told the story to someone who was related to another BP agent who told the story to that agent, who decided it was the job of a BP agent to report a shooting, so they did.

And they also did this:

No sooner had Aldrete-Davila bandaged his buns when the U.S. Department of Homeland Security sent an investigator [into Mexico] to offer Aldrete-Davila immunity for illegally entering the U.S., smuggling the dope and unlawful flight to avoid arrest.

To sweeten the deal, the feds paid for treatment of Aldrete-Davila's injured backside at William Beaumont Army Medical Center in El Paso. He showed his gratitude in breaking his immunity agreement by attempting to smuggle an additional 1,000 pounds of weed into the U.S. the following October.

So what did the feds do? U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton extended his immunity to this second felony and then sealed the indictment for this crime from jurors. And what did Aldrete-Davila do? He promptly filed a $5 million lawsuit against the feds who twice granted him immunity.

http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=254017135120661

The jury didn't get to hear about the crimes of the so-called "victim" against our country, or that he was smuggling over 700 pounds of drugs into our country at the time, which makes his claim, days later, that he was "unarmed," dubious, at best.

The more facts that come out in this case, the more it looks like the prosecutor and the feds in this case are actively supporting invading drug-smugglers.

43 posted on 01/29/2007 10:21:47 AM PST by teawithmisswilliams (Basta, already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Don't confuse the open-borders crowd with this kind of data. It might undermine their effort to destroy these two Hispanic Americans for doing their job.


44 posted on 01/29/2007 10:42:32 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
I doubt the smuggler shot himself in the ASS.

Why not? John Kerry did and he got a medal for it.

45 posted on 01/29/2007 11:00:29 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
I will note that over a week ago I mentioned that, among the many different stories being told by the defense, one of them was that Daviles was NEVER SHOT by the agents. I was ordered to "provide evidence" that this claim was being made. Well, here it is.

You should go back to those other threqads and post the link to this one. See if the open borders crowd will even bother to red this. (My bet is no. They don't want to know anything that might disturb their certainty that these agents are bad people. Especially because they're Hispanic. Like Estrada.)

46 posted on 01/29/2007 11:03:07 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
But he still has a year

Almost two -- until 1/20/09, 12 noon Eastern time.

47 posted on 01/29/2007 11:05:09 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: teawithmisswilliams
Sure seems that way. I wonder what all skeletons are in that DAs closet.

There needs to be a closer looks at John Sutton and his possible connection to drug dealers. Or is he being blackmailed?

48 posted on 01/29/2007 11:06:38 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
The rest is conjecture, since the gestapo is hiding massive exculpatory evidence. Warren Commission redux.

Did Johnny Sutton act alone?

49 posted on 01/29/2007 11:06:54 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Sounds like Nifongitis has infected other prosecutorial offices and prosecutors.

Sutton, Patrick Fitzgerald, Ronnie Earl...

50 posted on 01/29/2007 11:08:07 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Here we have another Nifong.


51 posted on 01/29/2007 11:09:26 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

bttt


52 posted on 01/29/2007 11:13:05 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Chris Sanchez is an investigator with the DHS Office of Inspector General not the FBI. One of the problems with this case is that the FBI was completely left out of the the loop when it is their repsonsibility to investigate the case.


53 posted on 01/29/2007 11:13:54 AM PST by Ajnin (Neca Eos Omnes. Deus Suos Agnoset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

I generally agree with your post #17--Christopher Sanchez is looking guilty of Perjury, if not much more.

One technicality: Christopher Sanchez was (reportedly) a Special Agent at the Office of Inspector General (OIG) at DHS--not the FBI. According to Friends of the Border Patrol (testimony by Andy Ramirez), he was a a four-month trainee, having previously served as an ICE agent in Arizona prior to that.

As to your post #18, I don't think you meant to direct that to me. I was simply pointing out that it has only been one year since the trial completed, not two years as Corsi wrote in the article.


54 posted on 01/29/2007 11:20:45 AM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat
Juries are not stupid.

Nah, they're just composed of people unable to figure out how to get out of jury duty.

And if you DO have a brain and think for yourself, the prosecutor wants you off the jury.

55 posted on 01/29/2007 11:40:44 AM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
I think that you misunderstood calcowgirl's reply. The dates don't match the story is all she was saying.

Thanks, e-s... that's exactly what I was trying to say.

56 posted on 01/29/2007 11:41:50 AM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

I have no idea why it hasn't been released. Lots of information has not been released. There are lots of questions and few answers at this point.

Have you seen this letter from Rep. Michael T McCaul about the stonewalling?

http://lang.dailybulletin.com/projects/pdfs/012007_trialprobe.pdf


57 posted on 01/29/2007 11:46:48 AM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heat

You've certainly exposed yourself and your agenda with that very revealing reply.

Thanks for your self destructive candor.


58 posted on 01/29/2007 12:09:27 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I've never been called for jury duty. I'd actually do it if I were, becaue I know the rights and responsibilities of jurors.


59 posted on 01/29/2007 12:18:21 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I've never been called for jury duty.

I've been called once.

Got tossed because it turned out my ex-wife had clerked for the prosecutor in the case.

I'd actually do it if I were, becaue I know the rights and responsibilities of jurors.

That would get you tossed just as quickly.

60 posted on 01/29/2007 12:28:05 PM PST by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08 - rationalization not required, he IS a conservative already)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson