Sutton's media pitch on Border Patrol agents' conviction may be a spitball

narconews, the narcosphere ^ | January 20,2007 | Bill Conroy

[CharlesWayneCT]

Issaquahking, why haven't you delivered the transcript to Congress? What are you trying to hide?

What, you say, you aren't responsible for transcripts?

Neither is the Prosecuting attorney.

Might as well ask guest on Meet The Press why they haven't reprinted their transcripts yet.

[CharlesWayneCT]

Hey look, real left-wing moonbats agree with those who think Sutton is a bad man. Yes, by all means, you should trust this source, it's probably about as good as the talking points put out by the BP agent apologists.

[Kenny Bunk]

Yes, by all means, you should trust this source, it's probably about as good as the talking points put out by the BP agent apologists.

Insofar as this source shed some light into some very dark Johnny Sutton-DEA-DOJ-US Attorney corners, I did "trust" it. However, although I was born at night, it wasn't last night!

Delving into their coverage of other stories at the suggestion of the team here, and checking out various personalities on the masthead (insofar as is possible, because I am suspicious that some are writing under pseudonyms)I'll plagiarize from Ronald Reagan:

Trust, but verify.