Posted on 01/26/2007 10:08:51 AM PST by SwinneySwitch
Ping!
If you want on, or off this S. Texas/Mexico ping list, please FReepMail me.
Where is the perp now?
What a f'n joke. (not you. our system)
The system is so broken that nothing can fix it short of a complete overhaul
"There was no secondary arrest. There was no secondary indictment," Sutton said of the allegation reported numerous times in the media.
That's because when he was caught the 2nd time he immediately told the Border Patrol agent....you can't touch me, I have immunity! The BP agent called it in and was told to let him go.
This scenario is totally plausible since nothing that happens on the border surprises me anymore.
"And Sutton needs to be in the Cell next to him."
Amen to that.
Where's the perp? Sutton is preparing a parade honoring him, it sounds like. What a travesty of justice.
ping
What is wrong with the DOJ? I wonder who is more dangerous Sutton, Fitzgerald or the judge.
The National Border Patrol Council insists there was a sealed indictment against Aldrete-Davila for smuggling the 1,000 pounds of marijuana.
Sounds like the Border Patrol knows more than we know about this travesty.
Careful. The National Border Patrol Council is a branch of the AFL-CIO, and knows just as much about this case as a substantial number of people on this website.
The NBPC is not a branch of the AFL-CIO, it's just an affiliation. If it was a branch of the AFL-CIO the NBPC would be supporting the case against the agents. They probably would have even recommended the death penalty.
He's now in Mexico?
ADIOS!
I've been asking the opposition to provide ANY evidence of this alleged "2nd arrest". Nobody has been able to give a name of a single person who actually KNEW about this second arrest.
Now we find that the "source" for this "damning" piece of information is the two BP agents who have been convicted. And Bonner says they ignored a lawful order to remain silent on the matter in order to reveal the information.
Obviously, a statement from the two people who are trying to discredit their prosecuter is hardly "evidence". And the fact that they were not charged with contempt is pretty good evidence that there is no court order requiring their silence on the matter. And arguing that the two people who you insist are law-abiding citizens violated a lawful court order simply to smear the prosecuter is hardly a way to convince people of their truthfulness and good intentions.
Absolutely sickening. This Sutton scumbag needs to fry for this.
""Absolutely sickening. This Sutton scumbag needs to fry for this.""
Couldn't agree more! The key is to keep the pressure on. Keep the emails going to Congress and don't let the stink over this malicious prosecution go away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.