Skip to comments.
Plan for superhighway
ripped as 'urban legend'
Worldnetdaily.com ^
| January 26, 2007
| Jerome Corsi
Posted on 01/26/2007 6:42:51 AM PST by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot
Sounds good to me. Then what will be your reason to whine about cheap goods?
If we could have the good paying manufacturing jobs back, you can price the goods as cheaply as you want and I won't complain.
So is that a yes to $200 oil?
No, we can pay for the research with the reinstated tariffs.
If ignorance were wings, you could fly.
If intelligence was a tariff, you'd be NAFTA.
61
posted on
01/26/2007 6:13:55 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: Toddsterpatriot
Did it increase trade?
Sure did. We traded good paying manufacturing jobs for an invasion of workers fleeing the NAFTA utopia.
62
posted on
01/26/2007 6:15:40 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio; All
Our government has been dysfunctional way before NAFTA....
63
posted on
01/26/2007 6:17:13 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual ways of preserving peace” – George Washington)
To: mysterio
If you plan to avoid answering a question, just ignore it instead of avoiding it so obviously. One would think that you'd have learned that from your protectionist colleagues by now.
64
posted on
01/26/2007 6:18:58 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: KevinDavis
We were talking about Mexico's government in that particular example.
65
posted on
01/26/2007 6:20:25 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
Mexico's government is going to pay for our energy research? Why should they, they sell us oodles of oil. Adding to our trade deficit.
66
posted on
01/26/2007 6:22:02 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
If you plan to avoid answering a question, just ignore it instead of avoiding it so obviously. One would think that you'd have learned that from your protectionist colleagues by now.
I'll address your point as soon as I can find someone in another country to answer it more cheaply than I could.
67
posted on
01/26/2007 6:22:40 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio; All
Whatever, I see this road is a good thing, if it means cheaper goods for me..
68
posted on
01/26/2007 6:23:55 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual ways of preserving peace” – George Washington)
To: 1rudeboy
I was being facetious. However,I would support a "ten years to the moon" type program to address energy independence. that seems to be a real missing plank in the war on terror when you take into account that oil is fungible and much of the money from its sale goes to fund terror.
69
posted on
01/26/2007 6:24:42 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: KevinDavis
cheaper goods for me
Certainly, if you subtract the costs of the illegal immigrant influx and tax funds going to displaced workers.
70
posted on
01/26/2007 6:27:00 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio; All
Well we should not give any money to displaced workers and illegal aliens....
71
posted on
01/26/2007 6:30:06 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual ways of preserving peace” – George Washington)
To: Boston Blackie
There was NO PUBLIC INPUT for the NAIS ID system for every critter in the entire USA being implemented by the USDA, either.
To: All
Jerome, if you are reading this, beware of the Stonecutters....
73
posted on
01/26/2007 6:31:49 PM PST
by
KevinDavis
(“To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual ways of preserving peace” – George Washington)
To: mysterio
I'll address your point as soon as I can find someone in another country to answer it more cheaply than I could. No, you meant to say that you'll answer it as soon as you get Uncle Sugar (and by extension, nearly everyone else on this forum) to help you.
74
posted on
01/26/2007 6:35:04 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: mysterio
If we could have the good paying manufacturing jobs back What about the good paying farms jobs that were lost over the last 100 years?
No, we can pay for the research with the reinstated tariffs.
What reinstated tariffs?
75
posted on
01/26/2007 6:44:49 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: mysterio
We traded good paying manufacturing jobsManufacturing jobs increased after NAFTA.
for an invasion of workers fleeing the NAFTA utopia.
You still don't know what happened in Mexico at that time, do you? Poor ignorant little man.
76
posted on
01/26/2007 6:46:59 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: ridesthemiles
Whenever I see someone complaining about "no public input" to this, or that, I'm usually seeing someone who snoozed through the public comment period, found out about too late to do anything about it, and is miffed that the Federal Government can't simply turn on a dime to accomodate them.
77
posted on
01/26/2007 6:47:52 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot
What about the good paying farms jobs that were lost over the last 100 years?
No need. They can get good manufacturing jobs as soon as we revoke NAFTA.
78
posted on
01/26/2007 6:51:38 PM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
What about the export-manufacturing jobs? Where do they go? Back to the farm?
79
posted on
01/26/2007 6:54:50 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot
Manufacturing jobs increased after NAFTA.
I said good paying manufacturing jobs.
80
posted on
01/26/2007 6:57:29 PM PST
by
mysterio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson