Skip to comments.
Plan for superhighway
ripped as 'urban legend'
Worldnetdaily.com ^
| January 26, 2007
| Jerome Corsi
Posted on 01/26/2007 6:42:51 AM PST by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
To: jammer
Because the black helicopters damned sure weren't myths. Were they flying over your house?
21
posted on
01/26/2007 9:00:00 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: C210N
Why is everything always blamed on the fringe lunatics, why don't the mainstream lunatics have to answer for their foolishness?
22
posted on
01/26/2007 9:01:07 AM PST
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
23
posted on
01/26/2007 9:02:35 AM PST
by
meg88
To: Paul Ross
Great movie, btw. Love Dennis Weaver (RIP).
24
posted on
01/26/2007 9:02:54 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: mysterio
But who cares as long as we can keep buying cheap stuff!! Pay more for your stuff. For the children!!
25
posted on
01/26/2007 9:06:37 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: C210N
It's far worse than anybody suspects.
I've heard rumors they're planning not just one road, but a thing called "The Interstate Highway System" that's supposed to be ALL OVER the country. Apparently this attack on our sovereignty dates all the way back to the *Eisenhower* administration. I'm shocked-- shocked! that even a war hero like him could imagine such a dastardly thing.
26
posted on
01/26/2007 9:11:34 AM PST
by
Ramius
([sip])
To: Toddsterpatriot
Because the black helicopters damned sure weren't myths.Status. True.
Check out Wikipedia's assessment:
Black helicopter facts At least some sightings of black helicopters are very likely to have been helicopters on exercises and/or missions. The American military does in fact operate helicopters painted in black or dark colors, particularly the Pave Low which is optimized for long-range stealthy insertion and extraction of personnel, including combat search and rescue.
U.S. Army and National Guard helicopters painted olive drab will appear to be black in the reddish light of dawn or dusk, or under other low light conditions during the day when their shadow side is viewed against the sky with the naked eye.
Real black helicopters do exist. Some of them are flown by units of the Army National Guard and are actually black (not dark olive or chocolate brown) when seen in ordinary light.
The U.S. Army regularly conducts both exercises and operational missions in United States airspace. Some of these exercises have taken place in densely populated areas, including Los Angeles, Detroit, San Francisco, Oakland and Washington, D.C. Most operational missions are tasked in narcotics interdiction in the American Southwest and out of Florida. By extensive use of GPS and night vision equipment, as well as other classified means, they are able to fly in zero visibility conditions with no running lights. At this high intensity level of operation, training is necessarily almost as dangerous to pilots, other air traffic, and the public as actual combat. Frequent practice is necessary to retain proficiency.
Many defense contractors and helicopter manufacturers also conduct public flight testing of aircraft and components or fly aircraft in public view to test ranges or other corporate airfields for training or demonstrations. Occasionally, some of these aircraft will be made for military clients and are painted in black or dark colors.
Were they flying over your house? Nope. Yours?
But I do get to see some cool C-130s and the local Minnesota Air National Guard do their air-drop trainings in our vicinity...and then they fly in tandem right over my house.
27
posted on
01/26/2007 9:14:22 AM PST
by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
To: Paul Ross
Real black helicopters do exist. I don't think it's a question of the existence of black paint, helicopters or some combination of the two. I think it's a question of if the helicopters belong to a top secret, UN or NAU type organization.
28
posted on
01/26/2007 9:18:07 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Old Professer
...why don't the mainstream lunatics have to answer for their foolishness?Answer:
29
posted on
01/26/2007 9:21:51 AM PST
by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
To: Toddsterpatriot
Pay more for your stuff. For the children!!
Exactly. Because we wouldn't want them to have good paying jobs or anything. Better to keep them in debt and buying that cheap stuff. If they want a better job, they can go to college. ALL of them. And since college is hard to afford, the government can create a brand spanking new entitlement that pays for all college for everyone.
You're right, the societal costs of cheap stuff are almost nonexistant. Let's just move all manufacturing to South America. Our workers are lazy and greedy for wanting more than five dollars a day.
30
posted on
01/26/2007 9:22:47 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
If they want a better job, they can go to college. Don't save your money for your kids to go to college, buy more expensive stuff instead!
Let's just move all manufacturing to South America.
I thought we already did?
I guess we didn't.
31
posted on
01/26/2007 9:28:20 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Don't save your money for your kids to go to college, buy more expensive stuff instead!
It's not going to happen. The last 60 years of Redemopublicrat rule has taught people that if they can't afford it, the government will provide. So once many manufacturing jobs are south of the border and college is like high school, the middle class will demand free college for their kids. And they'll get it, regardless of which party is in power.
All so we can save 50 cents on veggies and get the hammer for $7 instead of $10.
32
posted on
01/26/2007 9:34:55 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
The last 60 years of Redemopublicrat rule has taught people that if they can't afford it, the government will provide. Maybe that's what they taught you in your public school, that's not what I learned.
So once many manufacturing jobs are south of the border
Damn that NAFTA giant sucking sound.
All so we can save 50 cents on veggies and get the hammer for $7 instead of $10.
Buy more expensive stuff, it'll raise your salary!
33
posted on
01/26/2007 9:39:52 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Maybe that's what they taught you in your public school, that's not what I learned.
Apparently you fell asleep during American history.
The cheap stuff isn't that cheap.
34
posted on
01/26/2007 9:50:20 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
The cheap stuff isn't that cheap. Is that chart supposed to show that the deficit would be lower if the government bought more expensive goods? Or if you bought more expensive goods?
35
posted on
01/26/2007 9:59:22 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Nope. Of course not. They were part of tests conducted in the '90s, and were in San Antonio (lots of pissed off people), Cincinnati, Los Angeles, etc.
I suggest you do some research before you show your ignorance by shooting off your mouth.
36
posted on
01/26/2007 10:10:01 AM PST
by
jammer
To: jammer
They were part of tests conducted in the '90s,NWO black helicopters?
37
posted on
01/26/2007 10:16:38 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
The chart shows the explosion of entitlement spending that you claimed not to have been taught about in private school.
38
posted on
01/26/2007 10:31:46 AM PST
by
mysterio
To: mysterio
The chart shows the explosion of entitlement spending that you claimed not to have been taught about in private school.I never denied that entitlement spending has exploded.
I was never taught that:
The last 60 years of Redemopublicrat rule has taught people that if they can't afford it, the government will provide.
Some people can't afford big screen TVs. Does the government provide those yet? Why not?
39
posted on
01/26/2007 10:38:02 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
People demand that the government provide essentials and some luxuries that their jobs won't afford them. As jobs pay less, more essentials become out of reach for a larger number of people. These people begin to demand that the government fill in the gap. And the Redemopublicrats have been stepping up to do just that since the Great Depression.
You can't deny any of this. And the more jobs move out, the more YOU'LL be soaked for the difference, if you're in the socioeconomic class I think you're in. And the rest of us will have to suffer under cancerous government, spreading everywhere to fill in the gaps.
40
posted on
01/26/2007 10:45:36 AM PST
by
mysterio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson