Posted on 01/23/2007 4:45:40 PM PST by STARWISE
Edited on 01/23/2007 6:37:01 PM PST by Lead Moderator. [history]
You don't really think Bush's proposals really pencil do you? No new taxes, balanced budget, and all these tax deductions and new initiatives. It does not pencil anymore than his prescription drug proposal did IMO. None are going anywhere anyway, except his illegal alien, guest worker proposal.
No, and I'm glad this President isn't running again. He's been a huge disappointment.
I could believe it.
to have national health care, first the private system - which is based on employer plans for the vast majority of americans - must be dismantled.
So are you. And your mastery of the English language is suspect. It is you're vice your.
Many of your posts against the President are very negative and for me that is a rant. I am not here in a court to go and post "your posts" for evidence.
I hope that you tell his answering person all of that and more!
Forget that other inquiry of mine.
I wish I had never "spoken" to you.
Anyone who would be a critic to someone's faith is NOT someone I wish to converse with.
WOW that's some price to pay for serenity.
We'll have to watch to see how many faces she manages to create during this campaign trail.
flag, I have to call it a night. It was interesting talking to you. Good night and God bless.
OTHO, this is not difficult...
Boss! You are correct! We ARE the most powerful nation on Earth....when we are united.
Remember what old Lincoln said.
Pres. Bush could be the greatest QB ever, but if his O-line lets one defender get by, then it's a sack, same as if he were Danny White.
So I think your could agree, for whatever reason, there's never been a president devoid of support from both the opposing and supporting side since Lincoln (and Nixon, but he deserved it.)
Keep it up and you'll find out how Hillary does when she's got full support from her side -and- mild opposition from 'ours'.
Perhaps old Hilly can ask him to be VP...he's got that military southern state thing going for him.
I bought a hybrid so I could go 70 mph and still get better gas mileage. Why should I have to go 55 mph just because someone else bought a 70,000 pound car to drive themselves across the state and it only gets 20 mpg at 55, and much worse at 70?
I can get 50 mpg at 70 mph, and better if I follow too close to trucks going 75 mph.
Hey, I believe you are talking about our new state sentator Michelle Bachman who is a beautiful woman. Very conservative and I'm proud to have her there. Her hand was on the President's shoulder - he campaigned for her here in Minnesota.
The latest AARP bulletin has several articles on the subject. If you recall, the heads of the Big Three automakers went to the WH to make a similar appeal.
Oh No.........now it's that sleezy L. Graham......
I can't stand that guy.
In sum, while the President is far from perfect I support him more than I do the jackasses in Congress (including many Republicans) and overall he's done well these past six years. IMHO you are unfairly blaming him for the sins of lesser politicians in Congress.
It appears that Bush trumps conservatism on a site I believe to be a conservative website, not a Bush website and forum. You can blame the lack of action on these issues on others than Bush, and there is validity in that, which makes it all the more important for him to bring them up again, doesn't it. Or is it, ok, I can't win on these issues, so we'll just forget about them and talk about Dem issues such as global warming, education, immigration (amnesty) instead.
Disagreeing with Bush on certain policies in good faith, and with posted reasons, equals a "rant?" Why don't you just say that you disagree, and post your own reasons? Why personalize stuff, so early and often?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.