Posted on 01/21/2007 9:49:11 PM PST by Mia T
LOL
HILLARY "Zelig" CLINTON:
WHEN A CONGENITAL LIAR'S RUTHLESS AMBITION EXCEEDS HER ABILITY
You don't suppose, as the campaign heats up, we'll be treated to seeing HRC out in the yard, clad in her best Martha Stewart garb, replanting shrubs, flowers, etc.?
She may even climb a ladder and paint that old house. If it's done in sage green light we'll definitely have a war on our hands.
WE REALLY DON'T NEED "THE VIEW" IN THE WHITE HOUSE!"
:-)
You don't suppose, as the campaign heats up, we'll be treated to seeing HRC out in the yard, clad in her best Martha Stewart garb, replanting shrubs, flowers, etc.? Well, if history's any guide, we'll be seeing hillary potting pansies and roasting tarts (oh wait, she already does that) (especially now that Martha's been rehabilitated). |
Thus, Vanity Fair's glamorous Marilyn-Monroe spread of Monica's digitally reduced spread was answered by Vogue's lushly Elizabethan, gauzy-focus, hindquarter-cropped-pleated-and-flounced, Queen-hillary-for-President cover. And now we have hillary clinton doing a Martha Stewart, who herself, is purported to have been "done" by the aforementioned errant rogue (notwithstanding the plain fact that Martha is more well-known for her tarts than for being one). Seems hillary clinton is now writing a book titled "An Invitation to the White House" in which she will follow the format of the Martha Stewart classic, "Entertaining", claim multifarious Martha-Stewart talents and wrap her indecorous and corrupt, backwoods, backroom style of White House "entertaining" in Martha-Stewart elegance and purity. (NB: Written years before Martha ImPloded.) "The clinton White House has been noted for the...innovation of its events," said Carolyn Reidy, president of Simon & Schuster's (aptly named) Trade Division, the book's publisher. hillary clinton's spokeswoman, Marsha Berry, added that the book will focus on how the clintons have "advanced the availability" of the White House by increasing the number and diversity of people; that it will "highlight the access that the clintons have given to more people, more types of entertainment..." It should be emphasized that it was without even a trace of irony or the slightest smirk that both women related the above. On closer inspection, hillary clinton's bizarre behavior is more than simple Ivana Trump-eting. It is vulgar, compulsive, shameless, smarmy, contemptuous, demagogic, megalomaniacal, in-your-face naked clintonism. It is one thing for the frumpy, chipmunk-cheek, huge-hindquarter fishwife to insinuate her image -- albeit Elizabethan-shrouded and low-res-clouded -- onto the cover of Vogue; but it is quite another for the corrupt harpy to trumpet White House access even as new charges emerge of the clintons' rapes and other predations, of the clintons' corrupt quid-pro-quo arrangements with a menacing and motley assortment of drug dealers, gun runners and nuclear weapons makers. For hillary clinton to vaunt White House access just as the clintons' China treason is becoming increasingly, patently manifest to all requires a certain level of contempt for the people and for the country that is uniquely clinton. Thank heaven for small favors... Or as the real Martha Stewart would say, |
The word "lady" and "Hillary Clinton" should not be uttered in the same sentence! The woman is definitely NOT a lady. She is The Heinous Harridan.
Jeanne d'Arc wept.
Mia -- that may well be the most coherent piece you've ever written.
Excellent!
What about my posts? Are they not also coherent? Why no accolades for jla, only for Mia T? "Why?!", I ask.
;^)
Thank you, Lee'sGhost. :)
bttt
No, yours are crap.
Sorry. My version of dry humor. Works better if you knew that before hand.
thank you, jla. :)
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.