Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Libby Injustice
Wall Street Journal ^ | January 20, 2007 | WSJ Editorial

Posted on 01/20/2007 3:01:04 AM PST by CutePuppy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: napscoordinator

bttt


21 posted on 01/22/2007 3:24:19 AM PST by PogySailor (Media bias? What media bias)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

You are confusing being "charged" with serious offenses (Libby) and "committing" serious offenses (Clinton). If you have read anything about this phony "investigation" of non-existing "crime" of non-existing "leak" about non-existing "undercover"/"covert" CIA operative, you'd know that "investigation" shouldn't have happened at all, as the name of "leaker" Richard Armitage was known since Day 1 (OK, maybe Day 2)... well before Fitzgerald took his expansive team "on a wild goose chase", as he himself put it, around Washington, DC.

If anyone should be charged with abuse of power (for political, and now it seems, also for personal reasons) and obstruction of justice, and perjury (during press-conference charging Libby), it would be Fitzgerald himself.

Answer one question to convince yourself of that: why do you think on the eve of the trial the press that was so salivating about minute details and rumors around this "investigation" is suddenly so quiet and uninterested, except sometimes repeating what has been "alleged" as a serious crime which they now know has not happened at all?

Try reading some posts of few months back on these threads:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=libby
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=cialeak


22 posted on 01/22/2007 3:43:11 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Think "Mike Nifong", DA in Durham, NC - he "charged" 3 young people with really very "serious crime"... abused his power for political and personal gain, tell me why he shouldn't be disbarred, at the very least.


23 posted on 01/22/2007 3:48:18 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter; AliVeritas; alnick; AmeriBrit; AmericaUnited; arasina; BlessedByLiberty; ...
Scooter Ping!!!
24 posted on 01/24/2007 7:31:20 AM PST by Howlin (The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Would it be ridiculous of me to ask why the former POTUS who granted the highly questionable pardon to Rich isn't being investigated....? Never mind, rhetorical consideration.

As odious as Rich is, Libby did have a duty to try to provide him with the best defense possible. Seems extremely petty to punish Libby for Rich's flight and pardon when neither were his doing. But Fitz has demonstrated that pettiness can be his forward quality.

thanks for the wsj link


25 posted on 01/24/2007 11:15:38 AM PST by prairiebreeze (I support the troops AND THE MISSION. I do not support Clintoons, RINOS or RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

bttt


26 posted on 01/25/2007 12:01:26 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson