Skip to comments.
Boeing Introduces New Interior for 747-8 Intercontinental
Boeing.com ^
| Jan. 18, 2007
| Staff
Posted on 01/19/2007 8:26:14 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: BluH2o
OK ... what about leg room in coach? Some airlines, mostly long haul carriers offer up to 39 inches ... you can have a great aircraft but if you're shoe horned in ascetics add little value. Check out this link.
http://www.seatguru.com/
A few airlines will offer 38 inch seat pitch in premium economy, but they usually offer 31 - 32 inches in standard economy.
To: sionnsar
The airline beancounters will see to that in about 5 seconds. It can't be. They would block the main cabin door.
To: Paleo Conservative
... upswept architecture giving passengers a greater feeling of space and comfort, while adding more room for personal belongings. Next trick: getting the TSA to agree to allow more personal belongings. :)
23
posted on
01/19/2007 9:07:02 PM PST
by
upchuck
(The American coup de grĂ¢ce is well under way. Thus far, the Donks haven't had to fire a shot.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Think I'll forget all about a Gulf V now.
24
posted on
01/19/2007 9:16:55 PM PST
by
AZRepublican
("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
To: Paleo Conservative
Having spent a good chunk of my life on the upper deck of a 747 transiting to China, my comment...What are they thinking? One of my worst flights was on Continental Business from EWK to Hong Kong. Their "10k per seat" seats were the worst ever. It's an example of where you let engineers push without feedback.
As an engineer myself, Boing should commit to one goal and one goal only(aside from the obvious of safety and useability). Passenger comfort. I am over 6 foot by an inch or so but in many planes my knees impact the seat in front of me.
25
posted on
01/19/2007 9:26:01 PM PST
by
Malsua
To: Radio_Silence
"That's ridiculous. A slick interior but a struggling airline is not going to buy a 747-8i so they can fly a bar around the world. That space will be devoted to passenger seats or the airline should buy a smaller plane."
They know more about their customers than you could ever learn in a lifetime.
26
posted on
01/19/2007 9:36:39 PM PST
by
Kirkwood
To: Radio_Silence
Rad ( Radio ) I do understand your point, and it is taken well.
I still feel, that those airlines who are struggling won't order a huge capital investment just yet.
You are correct, max as much as you can.
I remember how the old 747-400 entrance is, and that was the area were they prepare food, and we have heard that they might move that area up in the loft.
I guess time will tell what the airlines will eventually use.
27
posted on
01/19/2007 10:07:27 PM PST
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Malsua
"I am over 6 foot by an inch or so but in many planes my knees impact the seat in front of me."
It's the airline that specifies the seat pitch and many other interior details. Pitch in particular is subject to change.
Lufthansa lost me as a customer when they decreased their seat pitch. They used to be a comfortable airline, even in coach. Now my knees, as you say, touch the seat in front of me. There isn't even enough room to cross my legs. Excruciating.
To: Radio_Silence
In the video concept of that same area, there is a bar, just not a out in the open bar, but, more like, a window that opens at the little room were the bartender is, and you have a little counter, and that's it, and opposite the bar/little room is a ??? FISH TANK ? ha ? ( yeah, I can see that when a plane is in a steep angle, and the weight of a fish thank ).
IN the video concept, the stairs are on the left side of the bar/bartender room.
29
posted on
01/19/2007 10:16:21 PM PST
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM 53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
To: Malsua
Don't blame Boeing. Its the airlines that decide what seat design they are going to use, their size, and how they are spaced out.
30
posted on
01/20/2007 4:39:33 AM PST
by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Paleo Conservative
It seems they could fit 3 and 3 seating in that lower section. Plenty of room down there. Windows would be problematic. But if they put in a low-cost "Galley Slave" class, I'm sure a lot of people would take them up on it.
31
posted on
01/20/2007 5:36:19 AM PST
by
gridlock
(Isn't it peculiar that no matter what the problem, the government's solution is always "more taxes".)
To: gridlock
It seems they could fit 3 and 3 seating in that lower section. Plenty of room down there. Apart from the practical problems with egress, etc., the long haul airlines make much more money putting freight in that slave galley than they could with paying passengers.
32
posted on
01/20/2007 5:46:03 AM PST
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: gridlock
It seems they could fit 3 and 3 seating in that lower section. Plenty of room down there. Why would airlines want to do that? They make more per pound of freight than they do from carrying passengers. One reason why the A380 isn't a very good design is that with two full decks of passengers, there isn't much room left in the cargo holds for revenue cargo after all the passengers' baggage is loaded. One of the advantages of the proposed 787-10 will be that two of them have more passenger capacity than one A380 with lower cost per seat mile and 180% of the revenue cargo space.
The 747-8 will be able to carry several more standard LD-3 cargo containers compared to the 747-400. It also is able to get longer range without using any fuel tanks in the cargo hold due to increased fuel capacity in the updated wings and improved performance of the engines.
To: Kirkwood
Actually, I know that they "know their customers". I also know they they build a great plane.
I'm simply pointing out how ridiculous marketing can be.
Let me know when you've taken a flight on any airline that isn't jam packed with seats or has bars, lounge areas, and such.
To: Radio_Silence
Indeed, and the passengers will pay the fuel costs to fly that disco-looking trim around. Think of the children harmed by the additional global warming from the extra CO2 produced. of course it is sarcasm - the warming part, not the fuel waste
35
posted on
01/20/2007 10:29:24 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
To: cmsgop
They ought to have less seating but a long, full bar complete with video poker. The airlines winnings on the video poker machines will more than justify the loss in seating. Also, they could provide no set meals, just a pub food menu, with hot wings and fries, Po-boys, burgers, soup-o-da-day, fish and chips...etc... By the time you step off the plane, you're pretty sh!thoused and either a winner or a loser. The flight will seem like minutes.
36
posted on
01/20/2007 10:40:35 AM PST
by
Mashood
To: Mashood
I Like the way you think, but lets not forget about a Cigar Lounge..:*)
37
posted on
01/20/2007 1:04:46 PM PST
by
cmsgop
( How do we know he's NOT Mel Torme?)
To: AZRepublican
Stick with a customized G5 unless you have large entourage. Gulfstream makes the best personal trasnsport jets in the world. I've seen their production facility down in Savannah and met many of the engineers and staff onboard.
There are a lot of folks who take a lot of pride. Hell, I'd be happy with an older G4.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson