Skip to comments.
U.S. tells China concerned by satellite-killer test
Reuters via Yahooooo ^
| 1/18/07
| Jim Wolf (Reuters)
Posted on 01/18/2007 11:39:51 AM PST by Abathar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Lets just add a few thousand more high speed pieces of crap to avoid up there you nitwits.
1
posted on
01/18/2007 11:39:53 AM PST
by
Abathar
To: Abathar
Deny space to all other nations. Now!
|
|
|
To: I see my hands
Problem is, denying space to all other nations would have the effect of denying it to our own as well, once the junk from those ASAT kills started taking out our own birds.
3
posted on
01/18/2007 11:46:39 AM PST
by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!)
To: I see my hands
Oh be serious. What we do need to do is repeal OST so that we can weaponize space.
4
posted on
01/18/2007 11:48:41 AM PST
by
AntiKev
("No damage. The world's still turning isn't it?" - Stereo Goes Stellar - Blow Me A Holloway)
To: Abathar
"The U.S. believes China's development and testing of such weapons is inconsistent with the spirit of cooperation that both countries aspire to in the civil space area" Waah waah waah. Wusses.
To: Abathar
Back in the 1980s, Space Command was really unhappy about the Vought ASAT, because it would kill everyone's space assets, including ours. Basically, a full test series would produce a lot of orbiting shrapnel traveling in random directions; this shrapnel would eventually kill OTHER satellites, which in turn would generate more shrapnel; eventually, there would be so much crap flying around that it would kill any booster trying to deliver a payload to orbit.
6
posted on
01/18/2007 11:52:16 AM PST
by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!)
To: AntiKev
Weaponizing space isn't illegal under the OST, unless you're insisting on launching nukes into space.
7
posted on
01/18/2007 11:53:01 AM PST
by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!)
To: Abathar
I would have to think we could shoot down any sattelite we want at anytime we choose. Perhaps I am wrong, but I bet the Chicoms weren't the first to think of this.
8
posted on
01/18/2007 11:54:33 AM PST
by
IamConservative
(Any man who agrees with you on everything, will lie to anyone.)
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
"Problem" Find a solution, problem solved.
|
|
|
To: Abathar
Basically, China wants to be involved in Space Terrorism. A satellite-killing device is just a space based IED.
10
posted on
01/18/2007 11:59:33 AM PST
by
C210N
(Bush SPIED, Terrorists DIED!)
To: C210N
So you are saying that the US has never developed the capability, or tested it, when figuring out how to kill soviet satellites? C'mon now...we're just pissed that they figured out how to do it.
To: ContemptofCourt
C'mon now...we're just pissed that they figured out how to do it. Pissed, but certainly not surprised. Heck, the kinetic kill vehicle probably had "Guidance by Loral" stenciled on it in Chinese.
12
posted on
01/18/2007 12:17:50 PM PST
by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: C210N
What would a 10 megaton cause in space? Wondering.
13
posted on
01/18/2007 12:23:29 PM PST
by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: ContemptofCourt
Its not that we are pissed that they can do it, its that they just put thousands of shards of high speed headache into the path of other satellites that we have to track and avoid now.
14
posted on
01/18/2007 12:24:14 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: Abathar
Our Space Shuttle was designed to nab low orbit Soviet satellites and return them to earth in one orbit.
15
posted on
01/18/2007 12:24:22 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Westlander
One hell of an EMP that would fry a huge amount of electronics wherever it went off. We did it once and learned the hard way to not do it again, kind of like a kid with matches.
16
posted on
01/18/2007 12:26:10 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
To: Abathar
"The U.S. believes China's development and testing of such weapons is inconsistent with the spirit of cooperation that both countries aspire to in the civil space area," It's apparently not a "civil" space program.
I hope we're at least even with them technologically in this area.
17
posted on
01/18/2007 12:26:31 PM PST
by
airborne
(Elect an Airborne Ranger,Vietnam Veteran for President ! Duncan Hunter 2008!!)
To: Abathar
Kinda like checking your septic system with a Zippo?.
18
posted on
01/18/2007 12:34:13 PM PST
by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: Abathar
On the day of the test, a U.S. defense official said the United States was unable to communicate with an experimental spy satellite launched last year by the Pentagon's National Reconnaissance Office. But there was no immediate indication that this was a result of the Chinese test. Interesting coincidence.
To: snowsislander
Like the Red Chinese government really cares what we say or think as a government. They're the big old yellow barn cat and we're a mouse they amuse themselves with by watching
waiting
someday.
20
posted on
01/18/2007 12:59:19 PM PST
by
Plains Drifter
(America First, Last, and Always!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson