Skip to comments.
Does anyone here want to survive?
Washington Times ^
| 1-16-07
| Wes Pruden
Posted on 01/17/2007 11:56:49 AM PST by JZelle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
The "Boneless Wonder" story is hilarious. Where's our Churchill now?
1
posted on
01/17/2007 11:56:51 AM PST
by
JZelle
To: JZelle
I think Bush is a pretty good speechmaker when he gets fired up.
Carolyn
2
posted on
01/17/2007 11:58:03 AM PST
by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: JZelle
I believe at this time in progress it will be very difficult to have another Churchill type speech. People in this day and age are too use to sound bites and catchy phrases and would not take time to sit and listen to a stem winder.
To: JZelle
Ronald Reagan was the great orator for me. After listening to him, I was ready to jump out of my chair and jump up and down and shout "Long live the Prez!" Pres. Bush came close to making me feel that way.
4
posted on
01/17/2007 12:02:00 PM PST
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: JZelle
W's State of the Union Speech after 911 was not bad at all...
To: JZelle
Best piece I've read in a while.
What is our exit strategy? Victory. Where is the politician who is prepared to say that, and mean it?
6
posted on
01/17/2007 12:04:25 PM PST
by
marron
To: AmericaUnited
His 2004 convention speech was pretty good as well. Yes, the writers help a lot but watching him come to podium and talk I just "got it".
7
posted on
01/17/2007 12:06:51 PM PST
by
misterrob
(Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
To: JZelle
One of the worst aspects about Boxer's attack on Condi rice last week, and that no one in the media even mentioned, was that Boxer said her children and grandchildren have no stake in this fight. WRONG! They are exactly who will bear the repercussions from losing in Iraq if we allow that to happen.
8
posted on
01/17/2007 12:08:00 PM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: Give therapeutic violence a chance!)
To: JZelle
I don't care about speechs; I care about winning.
I think we ARE winning, but we have our own media working against us. With firepower like that on the enemy's side, no wonder we have a problem.
First thing Pres. Bush should have done is put in Wartime Censorship Rules. The media should have been drafted from day one - and anybody who didn't come on board should should have been put under the jail; their lawyers should still filing documents just to find out WHERE their clients are...
To: JZelle
I hear that Hitler was a good speaker. I think, though, that you may want to look a little deeper in deciding who to vote for.
To: JZelle
Bush has never been able to explain to the American people why Iraq fits into the war on terror. As a consequence, he has let himself get painted into the "Bush lied" about WMD corner.
To: JZelle
And what did Churchill get as a reward for his brilliant leadership during the war...he was heavily defeated in the election of 1945.
Just because you have a Churchill doesn't mean he will be appreciated.
12
posted on
01/17/2007 12:12:32 PM PST
by
dawn53
To: JZelle
"I have waited 50 years to see the Boneless Wonder."
Behold the Republican Senator!
13
posted on
01/17/2007 12:13:15 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Romney si! Rudy no!)
To: Little Ray
islam is a religion of peace.....
and the media has been saying so ever since.
I too don't give a crap about speeches, I care about winning this War, too bad our leaders don't want to win.
14
posted on
01/17/2007 12:14:52 PM PST
by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
To: marron
"... without victory there is no survival."
Indeed.
15
posted on
01/17/2007 12:16:50 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
("... without victory there is no survival." - Winston Churchill)
To: JZelle; All
"You ask what is our aim?" Winston Churchill told his critics in the spring of 1940, when civilization teetered in the balance. "I can answer in one word: Victory. Victory at all costs. Victory in spite of all terror, however long or hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival." This is even truer today, than it was then.
To: lilylangtree
Ronald Reagan was the great orator for me. After listening to him, I was ready to jump out of my chair and jump up and down and shout "Long live the Prez!" At that time, I wasn't a big fan of President Reagan, but whenever I'd listen to his speeches, but the end of them I was nodding my head in agreement! That's why he was called The Great Communicator! BTW, my viewpoints have changed since those days.
To: JZelle
The Pres is to act rather than talk. That is leadership. Talk is cheap.
To: JZelle
Churchill was the last, great Victorian era statesman. He idolized that time period, and it showed in his speeches and his writings. We are too far removed from that time now, and we will never have another like him, though we will have other great orators who will communicate using more current methods. Reagan comes to mind.
19
posted on
01/17/2007 12:21:28 PM PST
by
The Blitherer
(I am not worried about the deficit. It is big enough to take care of itself. -Reagan)
To: Brilliant
He was awesome. Pres Clinton is pretty good, too. So was Mao. So is Iammadjohn, Chavez, you name it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson