Skip to comments.
Bering land bridge theory disputed
Express-News ^
| 12 Jan 2007
| Melissa Ludwig
Posted on 01/15/2007 7:49:20 AM PST by FLOutdoorsman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
To: gardengirl
When I was in sixth grade teacher who claimed the Earth had a broad, elliptical orbit which accounted for the seasonal changes.
__________________________________________________________
Apparently I have no respect for authority and no writing skills, yeesh!
81
posted on
01/15/2007 2:00:28 PM PST
by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: Grizzled Bear
S'all right. I took it with at face value!
To: gardengirl
Nothing-because according to the experts it can't exist!
I remember reading an article awhile back about a portion of a creek bed much like mine being uncovered, and the discovery of human prints there as well. The scientist in charge accused the local towns people of carving the footprints and covering them back up! BWAHAHA!
xxxxxxxxxx
In my opinion time to find another scientist. keep trying.
83
posted on
01/15/2007 2:51:02 PM PST
by
CHICAGOFARMER
(12 TH GENERATION PATRIOT.)
To: Vaquero
the Indians killed off the original horses(yum).... Of course they were "horsoids" then, not Secretariat.
84
posted on
01/15/2007 2:59:54 PM PST
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: gardengirl
Not necessarily. Eons ago, when the continents were in different locations than they are now (and before all of the mountains we now see were formed), parts of North America were under water. There are marine fossils in parts of this continent that are now nowhere near the ocean.
85
posted on
01/15/2007 3:16:18 PM PST
by
kellynch
("Our only freedom is the freedom to discipline ourselves." -- Bernard Baruch)
To: kellynch
There was a whole line of these sandstone boulders about half a mile from the cheerio rock. Same color, etc. We just had the only one with remnants of marine life. Glacier moved?
To: SunkenCiv
87
posted on
01/15/2007 3:32:48 PM PST
by
ken21
(it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
To: CHICAGOFARMER
It's like talking to liberals! :)
To: olde north church
89
posted on
01/15/2007 4:26:09 PM PST
by
Leatherneck_MT
(In a world where Carpenters come back from the dead, ALL things are possible.)
To: fish hawk
Ah.. but the Camel, and it's entire family, originated **only** in North America.
90
posted on
01/15/2007 5:33:14 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: L98Fiero
..about the same time humans prefected "Bravo Sierra"
91
posted on
01/15/2007 5:35:04 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: SandwicheGuy
Right-O!
I have a ~~9000 year old 'fleshing Stone' found right in my yard here in upstate NY.
I rarely even show it because it "doesn't exist" in the eyes of "conventional wisdom", isn't made of the "correct material" (it's a grade 9 limestone piece - and sharp as hell, with finely honed and dead straight edges), and is from "the edge of the glacier" where no man could or would have lived "when it was made".
Go Figure.
92
posted on
01/15/2007 5:43:51 PM PST
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: xcamel
Then the White Man came along and smoked them.
93
posted on
01/15/2007 6:00:59 PM PST
by
fish hawk
(. B O stinks. That would be body odor and Barak Obama)
To: xcamel
More artifacts exist like that than we realize. I spent a LOT of time, not just in the creek, but looking for arrowheads. On this particualr day, I was playing in a gravel deposit in the edge of the creek and collecting rocks. When I got home, I showed my dad the neat fish-shaped rock I'd found. He laughed. It was an arrowhead, perfect, flint?/quartz?, and beautiful. I didn't recognize it at the time because I wasn't looking for arrowheads-I was looking for rocks. LOL
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
As stockpirate noted, there have been other threads about this on FR recently. IIRC, I first saw it in Scientific American this fall. The sites they are examining seem to predate the clovis sites by tens of thousands of years, and the dna links they're studying seem more connected to southeast Asia than northeast Russia. That was from a study of South American Indians, comparing them to people from - I want to say Indonesia, but they were probably from the continent. I'll see if I can find a link.
95
posted on
01/15/2007 6:48:36 PM PST
by
sig226
(See my profile for the democrat culture of corruption list.)
To: sig226
Thank you.
Nothing says there was only "one" group of people coming through.
96
posted on
01/15/2007 10:33:11 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Vaquero
The only reason why Indians took to riding horses was because they first saw whites riding them and thought--yeah, what a good idea. Ditto the lance. The Comanche were pretty good at each, and of course great a shooting arrows from a full gallop. It took W.T. Sherman himself finally to taken them down.
97
posted on
01/15/2007 10:46:47 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: sodpoodle
To: Interesting Times
99
posted on
01/15/2007 10:49:17 PM PST
by
zot
(GWB -- the most slandered man of this decade)
To: fish hawk
The Chickasaw certain got horses from the whites--from the French, the Spanish, and the English. and they even developed their own horse, the quarter-horse. Upon removal they drove hundreds from Tennessee, up the Arkansas into Oklahoma.
100
posted on
01/15/2007 10:50:29 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson