Skip to comments.
Texas Congressman Ron Paul files for GOP presidential bid
kristv.com ^
| today
Posted on 01/11/2007 6:06:07 PM PST by Rodney King
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 641-660 next last
To: CWOJackson
121
posted on
01/11/2007 7:26:25 PM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Mr. Mojo
I thought her thang is this war?
122
posted on
01/11/2007 7:26:50 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: Rodney King
LOL! The answer is your guy Paul is a pathetic fool and a willing tool.
To: BigTom85; chesty_puller
DONT PUT WORDS IN MY MOUTH!Your own words will suffice.
The only reason we are jacking up the # of troops is so that the contractors can continue to cash in. Bush and many of his buddies are heavily invested in these private companies that are over there!
124
posted on
01/11/2007 7:27:32 PM PST
by
dighton
To: onyx
Does this mean now it's ok to vote for a candidate with an (R) after his name?
125
posted on
01/11/2007 7:27:59 PM PST
by
Mo1
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC AND DONATE)
To: dighton
To: BigTom85
The only reason we are jacking up the # of troops is so that the contractors can continue to cash in. Bush and many of his buddies are heavily invested in these private companies that are over there! These are your words. Some of those troops are going to die. So Bush and his buddies can make money? You and Ron Paul deserve each other.
127
posted on
01/11/2007 7:29:04 PM PST
by
chesty_puller
(USMC 70-73 3MAF VN 70-71 US Army 75-79 3d Inf Old Guard)
To: CWOJackson
You completely missed the point. Paul doesn't
need Republican Committee $$, or anything from Cindy S. His constituents return him term after term. He's in a secure district.
Doesn't look like you have much comprehension of the Constitution either. Where was War declared? How does one surrender in a non-existent war?
128
posted on
01/11/2007 7:29:53 PM PST
by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
To: BigTom85
The only reason we are jacking up the # of troops is so that the contractors can continue to cash in. Nothing wrong with differing opinions, but that stuff is just kook-speak.
To: Mo1
130
posted on
01/11/2007 7:30:20 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: CWOJackson
You still didn't answer the question. I'm not surprised you prefer Hillary to Paul. You Rino's always tell libertarians and conservatives that we are all friends when you want out votes, but really you prefer the Dems to us.
131
posted on
01/11/2007 7:30:45 PM PST
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: BigTom85
The only reason we are jacking up the # of troops is so that the contractors can continue to cash in. Bush and many of his buddies are heavily invested in these private companies that are over there! Well....not so fast, we're trying to instill a democracy in the M.E. (first of it's kind since Israel) with purple fingers and all. Meanwhile, the Saudis are funding the Sunis, and Iran backs the Shiites. And, there's a sH*tload of oil under it all. Did I mention the 'oil'?
Seems to me the fight is to determine which 'cameltarian' will control this valuable asset. That we might have made a friend in Iraq would look good next to my Chevy, 8.1 liter V-8.
The twenty thousand troops are insurance that we'll not be standing in gas rationing lines any time soon.('till we get started drilling Caribouville)
We ought not be too harsh on those willing to spend our nation's precious bounty-- as they are acting in our best interests in an attempt to secure for us a slice of the 'oil' pie (even if they take a bit for themselves).
Iran wants the whole pie and is willing to 'microwave' it for us, if need be. Sadly, we can't just negotiate with religious extremists any more than I can get into the 700 Club. "Rational beings need not apply".
The conclusion gets messier, so I'll just end it here.
132
posted on
01/11/2007 7:31:50 PM PST
by
budwiesest
(I approve of this message.)
To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
"His constituents return him term after term. He's in a secure district."
Oh, he's in a liberal bastion that approves of surrendering. It's a shame there aren't any conservatives there...or liberals with some spine.
To: Rodney King
Funniest news I've seen in awhile. Don't you dreamers know that, aside from ego, the main reason very minor political figures like Paul file to run for president is that they can raise and KEEP money? True, there are rules for what they can use unspent campaign money for, but the rules are pretty generous.
Looks like Tancredo, Paul and Hunter are next year's Buchanan, Keyes and Bauer. They are going to be slicing and dicing "true" conservative contributions and primary votes, if they stay in the race until the primaries begin.
It's just hilarious that election after election there are folks who are totally taken by what is essentially a con.
134
posted on
01/11/2007 7:33:35 PM PST
by
Wolfstar
("Common sense is not so common." Voltaire, 1764)
To: Rodney King
You don't have any questions, but when it comes to a urinal target, I'll take Cut-N-Run-Ron. Don't worry, a little more yellow on him will be hardly noticeable.
To: Wolfstar
Bob Barr is running too. Decisions, decisions.
136
posted on
01/11/2007 7:34:56 PM PST
by
onyx
(DONATE NOW! -- It takes DONATIONS to keep FR running!!)
To: Wolfstar
Don't forget the crucial element...gullible people who will throw their money at them.
To: Wolfstar
Looks like Tancredo, Paul and Hunter are next year's Buchanan, Keyes and Bauer. Don't count those guys out yet!
138
posted on
01/11/2007 7:36:09 PM PST
by
Howlin
(The GOP RATS - Republicans Against Total Success (Howie66))
To: onyx
Yeah, that's her main gig. But she's a leftist through and through, so her support for Paul is a one-issue thang.
And that one issue is the main reason I can't support him for Prez -- cutting and running in Iraq would damage the U.S. immeasurably, and advocating a foreign policy that's strongly against pre-emptive action against terrorist-sponsoring states is very short-sighted.
To: onyx
What's Barr's position on surrender?
We know Paul has taken the French Connection and Tancredo doesn't think we're going to win the war on terror...has Barr announced his position?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 641-660 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson