Posted on 01/10/2007 12:44:45 PM PST by looscnnn
Our National Guard.
A defendant in a small claims action may demand a jury trial in New York, but not in California.
Perhaps you can petition Ginsberg or Souter to seize that power as well.
The Bill of Rights, as written by the Founding Fathers, only applied to the federal government. In other words, those rights could not be infringed by the federal government.
The states were free to infinge (and many did), guided only by their state constitution. This is called federalism. Which I favor.
So to answer your question, yes, I believe your rights are protected by your state and should be protected by your state. You, as a citizen, have the most control over a local government.
I do not want five federal justices interpreting the free speech clause of the first amendment and applying that interpretation to all 50 states. Or any other amendment.
"Does the state decide who gets any rights at all, or just the right to keep and bear arms?"
Not "gets rights". When it comes to the the right to keep and bear arms, each state decides whether to protect that right and to what extent they will protect it. The second amendment (which has not been "incorporated") has nothing to do with your individual RKBA.
No. My wife would object. Just stop beggin' already. This is a drug free household, you'd have to leave your dope in Cali.
National Guard is now part of the Army. It is no longer the citizen militia. Sorry...
LOL. A small one would do.
Did we have a national guard in the 1700's?
We didn't.
The militia is not the national guard.
Nope, not an asshole, just tired of people making up BS about subjects they know nothing about and stirring up crap on the boards. With your comments though, I'd say that you might want to re-evaluate just who is what in this conversation.
Mike
I'm not certain that is really the case; it might be that the states and Federales just didn't bother regulating cannon, even though they weren't protected by the 2nd Amendment. Be interesting to see what laws DID govern armed ships in American harbors.
Unfortunately, the Commies figured out that lawyers were more dangerous than armies and used 'em against us.
What we really need is Lawyer Control...
Read the constitution. It provides for calling up the militia to defend against invading armies and navies. It provides for letters of marque and reprisal so that civilians can capture enemy warships. Then read the second amendment. Read the Federalist papers where it's pointed out that no standing army could hope to win against a militia that is similarly armed. Read statements of the founders from the time period when the constitution and the bill of rights were ratified. Their concern was whether the people would always be armed heavily enough to defeat any army on earth (including our own), not that the people might get too many scary weapons. Square that with disarming the people or even placing limits on what weapons they should have. An honest originalist reading of the constitution may lead to the conclusion that we may need an amendment to ban civilian nukes.
How 'bout civilian nukes, chem and bio? I'm willing to take a chance on HE, but NBC is a little long lasting in its effects...
No kidding, NBC is nasty. But, my post was academic; I don't think we really have to worry about the SCOTUS tossing out NBC regulations on 2nd amendment grounds any time soon. Even if they did rule that we needed a constitutional amendment to regulate WMD, I bet we would witness the fastest ratification of a constitutional amendment in history. It might even be ratified before SCOTUS can even grant cert. Besides, no matter what the courts do, Jack Bauer will lay a 24 hour smack-down on any would be terrorist.
And self-appointed fake militia "officers" would flee it, peeing themselves in terror.
The Militia Act of 1903 says it is. Read a book.
Oh shut the hell up you hopeless scumbag.
You're so sensitive. Don't be scared.
Scared? Of you? Not hardly...
Don't let nightmares of the National Guard chasing you ruin your rest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.