U.S.- Mexico Pact Revealed: Billions to Non-Citizens.

NewsMax.Com ^ | Jan.5 '06 | Dave Eberhart

[rottndog]

You really need to start paying attention to Jim Rob and the Mods, rot.

I ask the admin moderator last night about the rules concerning references to Bush and impeachment. I'm still awaiting a response. I've never heard of such a rule, but if there is one I would like to know.

This is a conservative forum (I presume you knew that).

That's why I choose to be here. I enjoy the free exchange of ideas, even ones I disagree with.

There is no rational basis on which to call for impeachment.

That is arguable, given that Bush has refused to control our southern border, even though it is one of his primary funtions as POTUS. At the very least, he is ignoring article 4 section 4 of the constitution: "Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;..." As far as I'm concerned, gross dereliction of duty is grounds for removing a president from office.

Why would any responsible conservative forum allow that kind of leftist rot?

Because, I thought, conservatives are capable of conducting a civil debate on issues, even when there are strong disagreements. It's the leftists who can't and won't tolerate differing opinions. Are YOU a leftist (you are certainly behaving like one in this matter)?

Are you lacking that level of logic? What's missing in your brain...

Personal attacks are very juvenile and also something leftists do. It's interesting that you accused and castigated other FReepers for doing what you just did. What was that they always used to say about people who live in glass houses?

[ohioWfan]

Answer to both questions.

1. I understand the facts.
2. I don't condone breaking the law.......ever.

Who even remotely implied any other answer to those questions?

Certainly not me.

Your imagination has run amok, Cobra.

But you've made me smile. Now leave me alone, and don't ping me to any more threads unless it's to address serious issues in a serious manner.

I'm an adult. I'll wait. Maybe some day you'll be one too.....

[ohioWfan]

There is no rational basis for impeachment and those who call for it are usually banned or suspended, or at least have their posts deleted, as well they should be.

This is a CONSERVATIVE forum. Not DU.

Good day.

[rottndog]

Good day.

I'll take that as a "I can't defend my positions and I don't like being contradicted because I'm insecure so I won't respond to you anymore" kind of answer.

BTW, I always have good days when a debate I am involved in results in my opponent stamping his feet and stomping off thoroughly defeated. Thanks for that...you've made my day GOOD!

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

A prediction: by 2008 Bush will be vilified more on FR than he will be on DU.

Only if such posts are allowed to remain by the Admin Mods.

[Cobra64]

1. I understand the facts.

2. I don't condone breaking the law.......ever.

Cool!

1) Is it not a fact that there are 12-20,000,000 illegal immigrants in this country?

2) Washington condones illegal immigrants breaking the law by allowing them to stay here.

Rewarding felons is such a nice idea. Don't you think? It just warms my heart that cities all over this country are infested by gangs of illegal immigrants.

[ohioWfan]

LOL! If it makes you feel like a man, go for it, doggie. Who am I to try to intefere with your acting out your self-esteem classes? :)

I know most of you Internet 'tough guys' don't have a whole lot going for you personally, so I'm not suprised by your faux bravado from the safety of your own comfy living room.

Now........real life calls, and it doesn't include any of the boys on this thread.....

Bye bye. :)

[ohioWfan]

I don't agree with this, Cobra.

But you know that, so I'm a tad bewildered at your pretense on this thread that I'm in favor of any of this.

Why are you trying to pick a fight with someone who agrees with you? Not enough to do?

[rottndog]

Bye bye. :)

Runaway!!! You're obiously very good at that.

[rottndog]

But you know that, so I'm a tad bewildered at your pretense on this thread that I'm in favor of any of this.

You're blind defense of Bush for his dereliction of duty to defend our borders gives you away.

[Cobra64]

Coming to a town near you.

Illegal immigrants.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mara_Salvatrucha

[lawdude]

"According to the article the agreement was signed in '04."

Try as I might, I just cannot seem to find any redeeming features in Bush. What were there were all LIES!

[ohioWfan]

Please post a link to any of my posts where I supported President Bush's immigration policy.

When you've stopped looking in a year or so, because such a post doesn't exist, you can apologize for your false accusations.

[ohioWfan]

I repeat......

Why are you trying to pick a fight with me when I agree with you?

And, are you for the Colts or for the Chiefs in this playoff game?

[rottndog]

I never said you did support Bush's immigration policy.

I said you blindly support him, which you do.

[ohioWfan]

Question.............do you feign ignorance of the rules with this rule-breaking post too?

Your behavior is rather trollish, doggie. You'd better be careful, or you'll expose yourself and your DU roots as you escalate this absurd game you're playing.

[rottndog]

Please tell me what "rules" I am breaking.

And when it comes to illegal immigration issues, I don't play games. I have to live with the consequences of Bush's open borders policies on a daily basis--I am directly affected by his dereliction of duty as POTUS.

[ohioWfan]

Silly boy.

How can I 'blindly' support him if I disagree with him on this major of a policy?

You're making yourself look really small here.

btw, I 'ran away' to class preparation for the college classes I teach, and spending time with my PhD daughter whose here from England.

I didn't lick anything. Dogs do that. Don't project your own shortcomings on me.

[ohioWfan]

Ask the Admin Moderator.

Your post is gone.