Posted on 01/03/2007 8:49:17 AM PST by kiriath_jearim
Apparently the 77gr is working very nicely for CQB, recalling the 55gr effectiveness but from short barrels. Hence I wonder how that compares to 6.8 on comparable platforms.
Penetrators probably got popular because the paper-pushers thought it was a happy medium between 55gr effectiveness and AP punch ... with the unfortunate result that it did neither well. Reading between the 6.8SPC lines, I'm wondering if it may prove similar: it is inferior to .308, and rave reviews only do CQB comparisons using something known inadequate (SS109). By only printing 77gr 5.56 vs. 6.8SPC comparisons where the later shines, I have to wonder what's behind the curtain.
The question of this thread is short-to-medium range sniping.
The 6.8 SPC is a definite no-go. Look at the latest Guns & Ammo issue with the tested 6.8 SPC...100 yard groups of 4 to 5 inches. Medium range would be out to 500-600 meters and you would be shooting 20" to 30" groups with this cartridge. Search posts by those who own the 6.8 SPC and you see 95% of them going well over 1 MOA in accuracy. The 5.56 is much more accurate.
For energy delivered and sniping the 6.5 Grendel is the way to go. Again, search posts by users and the majority of 6.5 Grendel shooters are getting 1/2 MOA at anywhere from 100 to 800 meters. There is also an article on the 6.5 Grendel in the latest Shooting Times (Mar 07) and groups are 1/2" at 100 yards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.