Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THIS DAY IN HISTORY - Militant prohibitionist Carry Nation smashes the Hotel Carey bar
San Diego Union Tribune ^ | December 27, 2006 | SignOnSanDiego.com

Posted on 12/27/2006 8:36:37 AM PST by DogByte6RER

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: GretchenM
It is often overlooked that the Constitutional amendment that gave America prohibition had to be ratified by three-fourths of the states in order to become the law of the land.

As did the repeal amendment.

61 posted on 12/27/2006 11:29:26 AM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Yes -- the will of the people prevailed for both events.

It is a good reminder that we can't judge a people's actions without having a good understanding of what was affecting them at the time.


62 posted on 12/27/2006 11:31:19 AM PST by GretchenM (What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul? Please meet my friend, Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: monday

Great post.


63 posted on 12/27/2006 11:33:44 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM
Yes -- the will of the people prevailed for both events.

At least that generation, in that time, recognized that what they wanted to do took Constitutional amendments.

The current de facto prohibition of alcohol and other substances or activities didn't take near as much work.

64 posted on 12/27/2006 11:35:10 AM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

I wonder if it would be illegal to name a beer after her.

"Carry Nation's Mad Hatchet Brew."


65 posted on 12/27/2006 11:38:50 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: monday
The "nanny state" has tried alcohol prohibition,...

No. We the People ratified a perfectly legitimate Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Just because you didn't agree with it is another matter entirely.

66 posted on 12/27/2006 2:28:14 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
I wonder if it would be illegal to name a beer after her.

Make it like the old days of beer (middle ages) when they put huge globs of rancid butter in it to cover up the taste...

Some people will drink anything.

67 posted on 12/27/2006 2:31:39 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: GretchenM
It is often overlooked that the Constitutional amendment that gave America prohibition had to be ratified by three-fourths of the states in order to become the law of the land.

Hooray! The first person besides myself who states the truth.

There was nothing illegitimate about Prohibition.

68 posted on 12/27/2006 2:35:48 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Legitimate, but misguided.

Morality laws are doomed to failure.

And no, I don't do drugs, visit whores, and fully observe the Sabbath. (I don't even have anything in my pockets on Saturday when I go outside.) That said, those are my choices, between me and my family and God, and sure don't want the government --- authorized by the people or not --- imposing their morality on me.


69 posted on 12/27/2006 2:37:13 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Even one of the originators of M.A.D.D. saw the handwriting on the wall of what the organization was becoming and walked away from it.

I never walked into it to begin with. You miss the point entirely...

I would rather dispense justice my own way, but you at the same time while complaining about a "nanny state," are exactly the type who would run to it for protection from someone like me when you screw up.

Prohibition is no different than any other legitimate Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (I will exclude the 16th because it was never properly ratified.)

The fact that it was initiated by an act of vandalism just like the Boston Tea Party is also lost on your myopic selfishness.

70 posted on 12/27/2006 2:44:57 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

People are doomed to failure... in a variety of ways...


71 posted on 12/27/2006 2:46:02 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

No sir, it is you who miss the point entirely.

I have no problem with your dispensing of justice and already told you that - I just warned you to watch out they were coming after you.

And running to anyone for protection from the likes of you is the last thing on earth I would ever do.....in fact I imagine you would do said running from me, long before I would even consider such an action.


72 posted on 12/27/2006 2:54:51 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
1900: Militant prohibitionist Carry Nation marches into the Hotel Carey in Wichita, Kansas, and wrecks the bar.

So she was the FIRST drug warrior using no knock entry and destruction of property raids? ;)

73 posted on 12/27/2006 3:01:20 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Not one of those seasonal Festivians. I practice the Airing of Grievances daily. Often on this site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; MeanWestTexan
I wonder if it would be illegal to name a beer after her.

"Carry Nation's Mad Hatchet Brew."

Make it like the old days of beer (middle ages) when they put huge globs of rancid butter in it to cover up the taste...

Some people will drink anything.

Yeah ... like the Korjaks

Soma still found among the Palaeo-Siberians called Korjaks, and also in a small Mongol enclave of Afghanistan. The first was a simple drinking of the juice pressed from the mushrooms between boards and mixed with milk or curds. The hallucinogenic indoles it contained entered the stomach; but a great many more entered the kidneys and were later discharged with the urine. Clean-minded Classical scholars have until now shut their eyes to the possibility that the Vedic hymnwriter may have meant exactly what he said with 'the great gods piss out together the lovely Soma'. Yet it has been known for at least two centuries that the Korjaks do so after drinking the mushroom juice, and that their friends strain the urine through wool and, after drinking it, enjoy the same ecstasies.

"Carry Nation's Mad Hatchet Brew."

Ingredients : Kidney Filtered Beer and Soma

74 posted on 12/27/2006 3:07:11 PM PST by Centurion2000 (Not one of those seasonal Festivians. I practice the Airing of Grievances daily. Often on this site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
I just warned you to watch out they were coming after you.

Who is "they" ???

75 posted on 12/27/2006 3:13:21 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

"Ingredients : Kidney Filtered Beer and Soma"

I was thinking more along the lines of water, malted grain, hops, and yeast, but I grew up in a kosher household.


76 posted on 12/27/2006 3:15:57 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Who is "they" ???

The nanny-statists you love to embrace. Are you that dense you couldn't figure that simple fact out?

77 posted on 12/27/2006 3:16:32 PM PST by Gabz (If we weren't crazy, we'd just all go insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000; MeanWestTexan

Thanks for sharing...

Here in the USA, a similiar brew of fresh cow dung that has hallucinogenic mushrooms sprouting from it in the early cold mornings after a rain could be made quite readily...


78 posted on 12/27/2006 3:19:16 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
The nanny-statists you love to embrace.

No. We the People ratified a perfectly legitimate Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Just because you didn't agree with it is another matter entirely.


Are you that dense you...

Now, you are just being a jerk...

79 posted on 12/27/2006 3:24:40 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
"No. We the People ratified a perfectly legitimate Amendment to the United States Constitution."

lol.... No one that I am aware of said it wasn't legitimate. You are aware that that amendment has been overturned aren't you?

Are you are trying to argue about the legitimacy of an amendment that no longer exists? How strange because thats not what I was arguing at all. If it will make you feel better, yes it was legitimate before it was overturned. You win.
80 posted on 12/27/2006 3:28:31 PM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson