Skip to comments.
Researchers say Lake Tahoe fault could deliver massive earthquake
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^
| 12/25/06
| AP
Posted on 12/25/2006 8:49:31 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Nah. All the bigsh*ts with lake Tahoe property will successfully lobby against the earthquake.
2
posted on
12/25/2006 8:52:42 PM PST
by
GSlob
To: NormsRevenge
Good thing my mother bought her place "up" from the Lake. Several hundred feet up.
3
posted on
12/25/2006 8:53:51 PM PST
by
Not A Snowbird
(Goodbye, Tomas. Sleep well. (? 1994-Dec 6, 2006))
To: SandyInSeattle
Some beautiful views from up there, for sure. Pretty country.
4
posted on
12/25/2006 8:59:11 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The season that stirs the spirit of man .. Merry Christmas)
To: NormsRevenge
However, it's unclear when a large quake might strike. As is always the case....
5
posted on
12/25/2006 9:01:32 PM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: NormsRevenge
The findings will likely make their way onto federal earthquake hazard maps that help determine building codes and set insurance rates. And generate more government grants to study it.
6
posted on
12/25/2006 9:06:57 PM PST
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
To: NormsRevenge
Here comes another disaster movie in the making.

Wonder how long before they come out with one about this. If they could find a way to blame it on Bush...it would be on next Sunday night.
7
posted on
12/25/2006 9:07:34 PM PST
by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: NormsRevenge
Let me know when CA slides into the Pacific.
8
posted on
12/25/2006 9:10:23 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: GSlob
Nah. All the bigsh*ts with lake Tahoe property will successfully lobby against the earthquake.Well we can all aspire to have been fortunate enough to have earned enough to afford lake property on Lake Tahoe. Unlesss we expect the government give it to us.
9
posted on
12/25/2006 9:10:43 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: NormsRevenge
Who is paying these SOB's salary, and who bought their boat, that is the question? I hate to find fault with fault finders, but my fault is that I am a pessimist.
10
posted on
12/25/2006 9:11:46 PM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
( Kerry, Graham and Dodd. The three amigo's........ of the terrorists.)
To: NormsRevenge
I'm always curious how much money was paid for this "scientific research".
Because I could have come up with the same report sitting here in Pennsylvania,and probably for a lot less money.
11
posted on
12/25/2006 9:16:09 PM PST
by
airborne
(HAPPY BIRTHDAY JESUS!)
To: Cobra64
I do not see it as anything worthy of envy. Scenery is good, but the would-be neighbors already there are not.
12
posted on
12/25/2006 9:16:59 PM PST
by
GSlob
To: NormsRevenge
Are they expecting Rosie O to take a skiing trip? I can see where a fall from her could set off the end of the world...
To: NormsRevenge
Hey! Bulletin... Bulletin... Bulletin... Mother Nature has her faults. People have just got to learn to live with them!!!
It's not nice to find fault with her!!!
Just don't forget... There's enough water stored in that very deep lake to flood CA's huge central valley to a depth of 1 foot!!!
14
posted on
12/25/2006 9:18:12 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
(For Republicans, the Reagan Conservatism Movement was the LIFE of the Party!!! We need it back!!!)
To: NormsRevenge
15
posted on
12/25/2006 9:18:32 PM PST
by
afnamvet
(It is what it is.)
To: GSlob
I do not see it as anything worthy of envy. Scenery is good, but the would-be neighbors already there are not.Sounds as if you have just met the wrong people:)
To: NormsRevenge
Well then, Put a bore hole from the South East, under Heavenly Ski Resort, that comes up in the lake, and drain the thing if it is a hazard to human occupancy. Can't have any hazards now, especially waves from earth quakes. Send the water down to where it is needed, maybe Sacramento or Oakland.
17
posted on
12/25/2006 9:22:39 PM PST
by
Sundog
(Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. Go Parse.)
To: Irish Eyes
Sounds as if you have just met the wrong people:)
Ditto that. My sister's there right now, and says it's as beautiful as it's ever been. Blue skies, temps just above freezing, and excellent ski snow.
18
posted on
12/25/2006 9:25:34 PM PST
by
July 4th
(A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
To: NormsRevenge; tubebender; hedgetrimmer; forester; ElkGroveDan; Carry_Okie; calcowgirl; ...
Oh wait! I forgot!! This cannot possibly happen!!!
Since Schwartzenegger has included the CA portion in the Sierra-Nevada GovernMental Land-Use CONservancy... Anything disastrous is no longer allowed to happen in such a GovernMental paradise. Especially one instituted by a pseudo Republican Governor!!!
This thread might as well be dead because none of this can possible happen now. It's all been prempted by GANG-GREEN groups and their Repellican Governator... SAFE!!!
19
posted on
12/25/2006 9:29:02 PM PST
by
SierraWasp
(For Republicans, the Reagan Conservatism Movement was the LIFE of the Party!!! We need it back!!!)
To: airborne
Having actually read full reports of this nature (something I strongly suspect you've never done) months and even years of painstainking research go into something like this.
And there isn't exactly vast sums of money spent on this stuff - it's not the space program or building a fusion reactor.
Still continuously amazed at the crazed hatred of science and scientists around here.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson