Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers find stem-cell therapy effective in targeting metastatic cancer
EurekAlert ^ | 12.20.06 | Kathleen O’Neil

Posted on 12/22/2006 4:53:04 PM PST by Coleus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 12/22/2006 4:53:06 PM PST by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus
FYI...

"The cell line used in this study (HB1.F3.C1) was derived from fetal telencephalon cells..."

I used to think awhile back that St. Jude's was a Catholic hospital...How wrong I was. It's private, and uses St. Jude of Thaddeus' name. I wonder how many Catholics out there erroniously donate to it, thinking their money will not be funding things like embryonic stem cell research.

2 posted on 12/22/2006 5:31:50 PM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right-wingin_It; Coleus
Ref: http://www.plos.org/press/pone-01-01-aboody.pdf
3 posted on 12/22/2006 5:33:20 PM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: right-wingin_It
To be clear..the "fetal" statement I posted, is from human origin...

From their mehods..."The HB1.F3.C1 cell line is a multipotent, cloned cell line that was generated by immortalizing cells obtained from the telencephalon of a human fetus of 15 weeks’ gestation, using a retrovirus encoding the v-myc gene [17,23]. The primary cells were obtained in accordance with the Guidelines of the Anatomical Pathology Department of Vancouver General Hospital, with permission to use fetal tissue granted by the Clinical Research Screening Committee Involving Human Subjects of the University of British Columbia. HB1.F3.C1 is an established, well-characterized, stable cell line [23–27]. HB1...."

4 posted on 12/22/2006 6:03:44 PM PST by right-wingin_It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: right-wingin_It

Does any of the information you have indicate how these cells were obtained? Specifically, do you know if the fetal tissue was available to researchers as the result of being intentionally aborted?


5 posted on 12/22/2006 6:10:12 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify; right-wingin_It
from the pdf file

HB1.F3.C1 Cell Line

The HB1.F3.C1 cell line is a multipotent, cloned cell line that was generated by immortalizing cells obtained from the telencephalon of a human fetus of 15 weeks’ gestation, using a retrovirus encoding the v-myc gene [17,23]. The primary cells were obtained in accordance with the Guidelines of the Anatomical Pathology Department of Vancouver General Hospital, with permission to use fetal tissue granted by the Clinical Research Screening
Committee Involving Human Subjects of the University of British Columbia. HB1.F3.C1 is an established, well-characterized, stable cell line [23–27]. HB1.F3.C1 cells self-renew in vitro, are nontumorigenic, and are multipotent in that they can be induced to differentiate into neurons, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes [17].

The use of this cell line circumvented the significant problem of limited availability of large quantities of primary cells and maximized reproducibility among experiments. The cell line was grown in DMEM with 10% FCS at 37uC in a humidified atmosphere of 10% CO2.
6 posted on 12/22/2006 6:16:37 PM PST by Coleus (Happy Chanukkah, Blessed are you, Lord, our God, sovereign of the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: right-wingin_It

"The cell line used in this study (HB1.F3.C1) was derived from fetal telencephalon cells..."

>I used to think awhile back that St. Jude's was a Catholic hospital...How wrong I was. It's private, and uses St. Jude of Thaddeus' name. I wonder how many Catholics out there erroniously donate to it, thinking their money will not be funding things like embryonic stem cell research.



These were not embryonic stem cells.


7 posted on 12/22/2006 6:17:18 PM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight

These were not embryonic stem cells. >>>

right, they are fetal cells from a 15-week-old aborted baby.


8 posted on 12/22/2006 6:24:25 PM PST by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: right-wingin_It
This Catholic donates to St. Judes for "the children"..From their own web site, you can read how ANY child in this country can be treated for FREE..

Payment and Charges

"St. Jude provides medical care to its patients at no cost to the patient or the patient's family. If you have insurance, St. Jude will bill that insurance company or other third-party payers for medical services provided by the hospital. You are required to help St. Jude comply with the insurance company's needs. Even so, you will pay no co-pays or deductibles. ALSAC will cover all direct costs of St. Jude medical care not covered by insurance or third-party payers.
ALSAC was founded for the purpose of supporting St. Jude. If you do not have insurance, you will be referred to our MedAssist office to see if we can find insurance coverage for your child. If you have questions about payment, charges, or insurance, talk with a staff mmember in Patient Registration".

God Bless Them..sw

9 posted on 12/22/2006 6:25:36 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

I read all that, but not being a scientist, understand very little of it. There seems to be no way of knowing how this fetal issue was obtained. At any rate, these are not FETAL stem cells, therefore it seems there is no restriction on their use.


10 posted on 12/22/2006 6:29:15 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: right-wingin_It

Actually St. Jude's was started by Danny Thomas, a devout Catholic, but has no formal ties with the Catholic church.



11 posted on 12/22/2006 6:29:29 PM PST by Coldwater Creek (The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

>aborted baby

Source?


12 posted on 12/22/2006 6:38:29 PM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight

Source? >>

check the pdf link from the artile.


13 posted on 12/22/2006 6:43:42 PM PST by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

>>check the pdf link from the artile.

I did. It does not say aborted.


14 posted on 12/22/2006 7:01:57 PM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify

Actually, the stem cells were harvested from an intentionally aborted 15 week old alive (at one time) baby in fetal age. The cells were fetal stem cells, cells destined to become different tissues in the brain/nervous system of a child purposely aborted (for what purpose I do not know, probably just to relieve the woman of life support responsibilities).


15 posted on 12/22/2006 8:01:08 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

How do you KNOW that?


16 posted on 12/22/2006 8:06:27 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify

"There seems to be no way of knowing how this fetal issue was obtained." Read 'The primary cells were obtained in accordance with the Guidelines of the Anatomical Pathology Department of Vancouver General Hospital, with permission to use fetal tissue granted by the Clinical Research Screening Committee Involving Human Subjects of the University of British Columbia.' Pathology dept. harvests tissues from aborted children for research programs. The key is 'pathology', though in this instance the 'pathology dept.' is not looking for a cause of death.


17 posted on 12/22/2006 8:10:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

That does not mean they were from aborted fetuses. It may be that they were from miscarried fetuses. That does happen from time to time, you know.


18 posted on 12/22/2006 8:43:42 PM PST by Trust but Verify
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify

Do you actually care one way or the other? Or are you just being argumentative as usual? You could satisfy your curiosity (if you care) by going to the website for the org whose 'pathology committee' approved the harvesting protocols that netted the fetal cells which were 'immortalized' then used for these research exercises. But then, I suspect you don't care if the babies were aborted or died of natural causes so long as 'their tissues were not wasted'.


19 posted on 12/22/2006 8:55:16 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight

I did. It does not say aborted. >>>

then you must really be in the dark.


20 posted on 12/22/2006 9:10:41 PM PST by Coleus (I Support Research using the Ethical, Effective and Moral use of stem cells: non-embryonic "adult")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson