Skip to comments.
Hillary's Divisive Image is an Obstacle
Dallas Morning News ^
| December 15, 2006
| Carl Leubsdorf
Posted on 12/16/2006 1:10:32 AM PST by Cincinna
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
"The swift-boating of John Kerry is going to pale compared to what she's going to go through if the Democratic Party is dumb enough to nominate her," stated one caller .
Keep up the good work. The Arkansas Grifters MUST be stopped.
1
posted on
12/16/2006 1:10:33 AM PST
by
Cincinna
To: Cincinna
Few people liked Kerry. The Rats are in love with the Clintons and the Drive Bys/MSM will only depict Hillary in positively glowing terms. By the time they are through, you will want to vote her in as President.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
2
posted on
12/16/2006 1:14:51 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Cincinna
Hillary's divisive core values are a bigger obstacle than her image.
Hillary's lack of patriotism, love of socialism, hypocrisy and lack of moral values are her true self. Unfortunately for Hillary, these traits are fairly obvious to just about anybody smarter than a rock.
3
posted on
12/16/2006 1:22:50 AM PST
by
Zakeet
(Be thankful we don't get all the government we pay for)
To: Zakeet
Asking the American people to wake up and see the Left for what it really is is asking too much of them.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
4
posted on
12/16/2006 1:28:19 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Zakeet
She has manipulated, triangulated, and discombobulated her image, but her values stay rotten to the core.
5
posted on
12/16/2006 2:03:03 AM PST
by
Cincinna
(HILLARY & HER HINO " We are going to take things away from you for the Common Good ")
To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Grampa Dave; Interesting Times; Alamo-Girl; ...
6
posted on
12/16/2006 2:36:25 AM PST
by
devolve
( ....shop_invest_and_hire_wisely)
To: goldstategop
7
posted on
12/16/2006 2:52:21 AM PST
by
tiger-one
(The night has a thousand eyes)
To: goldstategop
The American people have NO vision. We just keep running the same old tired people, and things in this country only are getting worse and worse. At some point there has to be a turnaround.
8
posted on
12/16/2006 3:17:06 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
(The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
To: mariabush
Most Americans have abandonded principles for instant gratification.
When you say there must be a turnabout, what exactly do you mean? Do you mean a return to self reliance? Or do you mean more government intervention?
9
posted on
12/16/2006 3:23:51 AM PST
by
monocle
To: monocle
Well, we could start with just common sense about the people that we put in office.
I was just talking about the elected officials at this point.
And, of course, I think that there should be LESS government intervention, and MORE self reliance.
10
posted on
12/16/2006 3:28:52 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
(The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
To: mariabush
One of my pet peeves is that most people and the media worship at the altar of voting issues. I believe it far more important to vote on a candidate's philosophy and prnciples. Too many people, knowningly or unknowingly, become swayed by one issue or another and ignore their own broader principles, i.e. the forest or the trees.
How often do you compare your position on any given issue to your basic principles?
One other point I would make is that basing one's decision on "the issue or issues" almost assuredly results in more government intervention and as the current issues fade into history new issues must be created for the next election.
11
posted on
12/16/2006 3:49:48 AM PST
by
monocle
To: monocle
Actually, I agree with you, but there must be a balance between issues, and the candidates principles/philosophy.
12
posted on
12/16/2006 4:09:05 AM PST
by
Coldwater Creek
(The TERRORIST are the ones who won the midterm elections!)
To: Zakeet
"these traits are fairly obvious to just about anybody smarter than a rock."
Unfortunately for us, there are a lot of rocks out there.
13
posted on
12/16/2006 4:11:11 AM PST
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: Cincinna
I predict a dhimmicratic bloodbath in the 2008 primaries. The algore, the hildabeast, the Fn-Frenchie, BreckGirl, PlagerizerBoy and Odumbo the Magnificent (just to name a few) are going to engage in an multi-media, multi-dimensional all-against-all Battle of the Titans... and popcorn sales are going to go through the roof.
14
posted on
12/16/2006 4:14:47 AM PST
by
samtheman
(The Democrats are the DhimmiGods of the New Religion of PC)
To: Cincinna
it is not just Hillary's Divisive Image thatis an Obstacle,
this pig's image is an obstacle in itself....no one wants to have a president with those cankles...the likes of which have not tramped the halls of the white house since taft!!!!
the piaps is devisive on just about every issue....she is demeaning/condescending/no patience for the public/feels she is entitled!!!!
she offers no hope/no positive vision for the middle class...she is the poster child of socialist/communist...that feels she should be ruling by dictate.....
she reminds most of this era of eva peron...both were/are whores but at least peron had charisma/charm/and could connect with the people.....I guess the comparison with the piaps should have ended with being a whore!!!!
15
posted on
12/16/2006 4:27:47 AM PST
by
hnj_00
To: mariabush
What kind of balance? Too many people, i.e. voters, avow that they are conservative but along comes an issue that affects them, either emotionally or otherwise, and without giving a second thought reject their principles for the issue.
16
posted on
12/16/2006 4:29:07 AM PST
by
monocle
To: Cincinna
Watch, Obama will be the lightening rod and be the dim forerunner until just before the election. He will suddenly develop a real big impediment, like have a Vince Foster, and Hillary will ride to the rescue. No time for questions, No time to evaluate her positions Just vote for "Joan of Arkansas" and save liberalism.
Where is a good witch burning when you need one? /sarc/
17
posted on
12/16/2006 4:37:00 AM PST
by
Steamburg
(If we don't want our nation bad enough to protect it, it won't be ours long.)
To: Cincinna
To: Cincinna
FreeRepublic has its work cut out for it.
"The Media" won't do it.
I guess the dixiechick gnat will have to be moved down on our "list." :-)
19
posted on
12/16/2006 5:06:05 AM PST
by
bannie
To: Cincinna
We need to push for her to be embarrassed (Ha! That bag doesn't GET embarrassed!) for LOCKING UP her college thesis.
20
posted on
12/16/2006 5:08:22 AM PST
by
bannie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson