After all, its not as if Clinton was shy about using the power of the Presidency (or governorship) to spy on people and/or sexually exploit them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
It was a FISA violation! Investigate BJ Now.
64 posted on
12/12/2006 10:53:14 AM PST by
rfp1234
(I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
>The British royals aren't much involved in politics or matters of national security
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Here's the issue I have with Clinton, and it brings back issues with his involvement with the Chinese. Clinton did not like using HUMINT - because agents leave good records of what they are covering. What Clinton did like using was ELINT, where he could gather information, but Clinton had a way where he could navigate around respective issues where his movements and possible involvement could be determined by ELINT. This is evident with his advocacy of Echelon and Carnivore.
Clinton may have had the hots for Princess Di, but I'm sure he had no interest in the Saudi, she was hanging out with.
SS
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Klinton spied, Diana died!!!
78 posted on
12/12/2006 8:01:50 PM PST by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I think Babbin underrates the importance of the monarchy. The Queen doesn't run things, but she can and does read the most secret documents. However, this doesn't explain the interest in Princess Diana, who was not and never would be the Sovereign's spouse (eventually she might have lived to be the Sovereign's mother, but that seems a remote concern). Perhaps, as others have suggested, it was the Fayed family that was really of interest.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson