You haven't talked to my eye doctor then.
However, American ingenuity to the rescue. This is actually my SHTF weapon, the only one that I don't keep locked up, although it resides in an undisclosed location.
Posted on 12/09/2006 1:48:44 PM PST by VOA
Yes, I know. Today however, those paratrooper models bring as much as a budget AK, and no one I know wants to part with theirs.
Thanks for the info on the bullet diameter. I haven't attempted to handload any 7.62x39, since I fire mostly Wolf through my AKs and it is not reloadable. I haven't picked up enough reloadable brass yet. I do enjoy handloading the .308 as I have a rifle that responds very well to ammo tweaking.
I guess that's what I was referring to. I am not familiar with the SKS mags with the "duckbill", but I hear the quality runs "hot and cold", and anyone I know that's used them has had problems with them.
I assume you are talking about the Norinco (Chinese) Paratrooper model. Norincos are among the better quality SKS's. The ones that re imported now, and are so inexpensive, are the Yugoslavian models with the grenade launcher and blade bayonet. They're good starter rifles, but I prefer the Norincos myself too.
About a year or two after I got the paratrooper model, I bought a brand new Bulgarian AK clone with a solid milled receiver for $165. Prices went up, then back down for some reason. I have one used Chinese SKS I got for $45. I have no idea what the going rate is these days. Of course, at the same time, you could get 3 East German 30-round mags in an original pouch for $10.
I do wish I had bought more of the 6.5 x 55 Swedish Mausers back when they were coming in in quantity. I did find a short-barrel carbine model with matching numbers about 5 years ago for $125. I think it was. Can't beat Swedish quality.
You haven't talked to my eye doctor then.
However, American ingenuity to the rescue. This is actually my SHTF weapon, the only one that I don't keep locked up, although it resides in an undisclosed location.
The only thing I see on their site is for the Thompson. You're saying they made the Universal Arms M1 Carbine?
Thanks! I have heard the same thing. That is why I am interested in the number of springs in mina as I heard the single spring models are better. The only problem I have had is with a 15 round clip I have. It feeds the 30 round fine but it does not like the 15. It is an old one and probably just a weak spring in it.
I have seen everything from Mini-14's to SKS's in order to qualify for a Garand at High Power matches. I even witnessed a guy try it with a Springfield Trapdoor in 45-70. I have never seen anyone use a AK. I think most beginners who are serious about shooting High Power use some sort of AR. They start out with it completely unmodified but that doesn't say in a few years the triggers and ammunition doesn't improve. Actually other than buying a heavy barreled AR there really isn't anything that can be done to an AR to improve them. The triggers lighten up if you shoot them enough. The only suggestion I ever did with mine was put weights in the rear stock and set screw the front sight.
I witnessed a guy shoot an AK at a welding tank at just a little over 300 yards. He was hitting on a consistant basis. He told me he must have bought a good one. Personally, I think they might be pretty good rifle but if someone just blasts away without taking care of the barrel, they lose accuracy because of neglect. It's not unheard of to hear someone claim they never clean their AK's and they never have a problem. I think not hitting anything after ruining a good barrel is a problem.
That'll work.
I really like the crank'em'in 75 round (? - I think) Chinese drum mags.
Not mine.
Even so the M-16 is vastly more controllable on full auto due to it's straight line from muzzle to stock design, smoother gas system and recoil buffer.
One of the best shooters I've ever seen uses takes a factory Armalite match AR-15 and adds a hooded rear sight and stock weight. He'll outshoot anybody in my state and is a member till he's sick of it of the All National Guard shooting team. (The national guard's version of the army marksmanship unit) He's one of a couple of dozen double distinguished shooter's in the history of the program.
Even old match shooters that grew up on the Garand and M-14 have converted to the AR-15 if they wanted to stay competetive. I get sick to death of guys that make outrageous claims that they get sub minute-of-angle groups with the AK-47. Taking your cocky rear end to a match with real shooters is a very humbling event. My first State National Guard competition I attended I won top new shooter, I wasn't even in the same zip code as the experienced guys. It took years to develop the skills needed to go distinguished and that was after 15 years of qualifying Expert in the Army and Army Guard. There is simply no comparison to the accuracy of a well trained M-16 shooter and anyone with an AK-47.
As far as the reliability argument, after 19 years in the military with the M16A1, M16A2, and M4 I've had ONE, yes that's ONE jam. That jam occured during basic training in 1987 and it was caused by a faulty round where the bullet actually was shoved back into the case and stovepiped. I have never had a jam with an M16 type weapon after tens of thousands of rounds caused by the rifle itself and I've been issued some trashed rifles in my military career.
I fired, and placed, in 1,000 meter rifle competitions (among others) at Camp Perry, VA and Quantico back in the 1980s when I was in the Navy. We were firing unmodified M1 Garand rifles with open sights. I have observed, but never competed in NRA sanctioned events.
Thanks for taking my "arrogance and ignorance" statement out of context. I was just using it to describe folks who think that quality is the monopoly of US weapons manufacturers.
You know very well that I didn't take your comment out of context. It is pretty obvious that your post was intended to be insulting towards me. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt however and say that maybe my first post was misleading in that I didn't mean to completely dismiss the AK-47 for any purpose. The AK has its uses, but I get very tired of reading on gun boards, Free Republic, and other internet venues how lousy the M-16 and/or AR16 are. I've fired many weapons, I was a unit armorer, I was a heavy and medium machinegunner, I was a member for three years of a state level shooting team. The M-16 is an outstanding weapon that is incredibly accurate and reliable when properly cared for.
Ping so that you can laugh at me.
Ping for some weekend gun porn and AK vs. AR commentary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.