Bush And Blair Refuse To Move Over Iraq

The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 12-8-2006 | Toby Harnden

[jveritas]

The liberal media is having a big let down again.

[ohioWfan]

But those of us who have observed this President and seen his strength of character time after time after time, never doubted that he would stand firm.

God bless him, and continue to give him the strength that it will take to fight the enemy abroad, and the enemy within.

[BARLF]

I think 10 but go to this site for more info.
Get your barf bag first.


http://www.usip.org/isg/members.html

[Eagles6]

Doesn't matter how many of them went. None of them are Armed Forces. They are failed diplomats, sleazy politicians, soulless lawyers and crooked businessmen. Why should anyone give a rat's a$$ what their opinion is.

It's like getting the town council of Nuevo Laredo, Mexico to build the next space shuttle.

[zarf]

The Democrats simply want power to do exactly what the President is doing now.

The anti-war rhetoric is a sop to the moonbats.

[jveritas]

Amen to that.

[popdonnelly]

The Iraq Study Group Report is on life support. Quick, MSM to the rescue!

[jveritas]

Exactly. They are very angry because they are not part of making history now.

[cripplecreek]

Everything the democrats do is a lie. The only reason they voted for the war in the first place is so they could stand on top of the bodies and campaign.

[onedoug]

Bush And Blair Refuse To Move Over Iraq

Just the problem, when they ought to be kicking ass big time. The US military is a killing machine and I think we should be about it.

[popdonnelly]

Quick quiz: Who would you trust with your country - Blair and Bush, or the folks in the Iraq Study Group?

[LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR]

Thank You for that Post - I've been sort of depressed the last couple of days - The Freepers posting the replies make me feel much encouraged on this issue. The President and Blair have encouraged me today.

[justa-hairyape]

Let us hope what happened here was GWB said, okay, Rumsfeld is gone. Now dad, Democrats, tell me what YOU think we should do.

Now that we know the Democrats and the old Gulf War 1 has-beens really do not have a clue, GWB can retool, regroup and reform the Middle East.

We are just in the beginning stages of the Islamic Fascist World War. Obviously it is not a Cold War. Eventually the enemy should become well known and should become well defined.

We should however expect the moonbats to draw up articles of impeachment if GWB does not follow the Bakers Dozen plan. At the very least the Dimwits and Surrender Now crowd will use the fact that the recommendations were ignored or not implemented fully as their campaign platform in 2008.

[SnarlinCubBear]

[adorno]

Bush And Blair Refuse To Move Over Iraq

What the Telegraph really wanted as a headline was: "Bush And Blair Refuse To Surrender in Iraq"

What Bush and Blair are really telling the surrender monkeys in Europe and in the new democratic congress in the U.S. is that if someone is going to surrender Iraq to the insurgents and the terrorists and Iran, it won't be Bush or Blair.

[jveritas]

It is very possible that the democrats will impeach the President because he is not going to follow the surrender term in the Iraq Study Group. However the President is ready for them, they will be defeated.

[Big Horn]

Its the most stupid thing I ever heard.

The surrender committee wants to go back to having the terrorists kill 3000 of us while losing 10 of them.

[justa-hairyape]

Looks like GWB called their bluff. Perhaps that is why Rumsfeld was 'canned' so quickly. GWB had to get the other sides cards on the table so the new strategy can be in place before year end. I can buy that.

[Earthdweller]

"In that war, our nation stood firm. And there were difficult moments during that war, yet the leaders of our two nations never lost faith in the capacity to prevail. We will stand firm again in this first war of the 21st century."

[TXBlair]

The Diabolical Duo. I love this!