Posted on 12/07/2006 2:40:13 PM PST by Tarkus2040
My bad,LOL!!
Here's some tasty meat-a-balls. LOL!
No one "diverted" any attention from Savage's contribution to Jerry Brown's AG campaign. Several people simply pointed out that Hannity contributed far more value to Joe Lieberman's campaign than Savage's $5600 donation.
If Hannity had charged Lieberman the standard radio advertisement rate for all the airtime Hannity gave Lieberman leading up to the election, it would add up to a lot more than $5600. Yet, you don't seem to care about that.
Many of your fellow Savage bashers also don't seem to care about the fact that the leadership of our GOP are about as conservative as Britney Spears on a bad hair day.
However we will keep your application on file as your many varied recipes for Savage-free meals are quite intriguing. But we are a busy bunch so please don't us, we'll call you. Thanks.
Hey! Whats up? Kind peaceful in here today without the peanut gallery.
just like Savage... abuncha talk... not allot do....
I've heard through the grapevine that the worst of the worst have been ordered to lay off. All we have now are the wannabes.
>Savage is the only one who gets it.<
Regarding James Baker being in bed with the Saudis, I was disappointed to find that neither did Bill Bennett or O'Reilly, let alone ABC, NBC or CBS. The enemy is indeed within!
Condi looks good with long hair.
Hi Tarkus,
Sorry I didn't get to post last night. Savage has been spot on the last few days regarding Bush Sr., Mary Cheney, and the ISG report. I think I have less respect for Jim Baker than I do Jimmy Carter. At least with Carter, he's a true believer in his pro-socialist/anti-semite ways. Jim Baker seems to be doing it for personal gain although I guess he could be a true believer as well.
I don't know where we turn anymore. Our side is in total--I can't even think of the right word right now.
Are you sure about Bennett? I haven't listened to his show in a while, but I thought Hewitt or someone was saying he was against it. Most of the people I've heard are against it--Hewitt, Steyn, Medved, Hitchens, Ralph Beters, Max Boot and I'm sure quite a few more notable names. Hewitt was saying that never in the history of these type of reports has one been puked back up so quickly.
The fact that none of these, Bennett, O'Reilly, ABC, NBC, CBS, have mentioned the fact that James Baker is "in bed" with the Saudis, belonging to the law firm that represents them is what I was referring to. This important fact should be made known to the American people.
Hmmm, have no doubt about the alphabet channels. I do know Ralph Peters is saying it on every show he's on--heard him on Ingraham, Medved, and Hewitt--really blasting Baker and specifically mentioning the relationship to the Saudis. This guy is really angry.
I agree.
Here are some replays of Hewitt's show to hear Steyn, Peters, and Hitchens talking about it if anyone is interested:
http://www.townhall.com/talkradio/Show.aspx?RadioShowID=5
I'm glad to hear that, but the major news organizations have a duty to report the facts. No wonder they are all going bankrupt. We ALL should be very angry, nez pas?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.