Skip to comments.
Baker panel's mention of Palestinian "right of return" raises eyebrows
AFP ^
| December 6, 2006
Posted on 12/06/2006 1:00:35 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 241-247 next last
To: A Balrog of Morgoth; West Coast Conservative
<< Let's just feed Israel to the crocodile.
Maybe then he'll leave us alone. >>
And if they don't, then we'll feed'em Jim Baker's leg and Sandra 'Swinger' Day O'Connor's.
141
posted on
12/06/2006 2:50:36 PM PST
by
Brian Allen
(B. Hussein bin B Hussein bin Hussein Obama is to Christianity what Michael Jackson is to hetrosexual)
To: Alter Kaker
I heard him say during the Senate hearings that he was involved on the panel for the initial educational phase and was not involved in the drafting of the report.
142
posted on
12/06/2006 2:50:50 PM PST
by
White Bear
("Una salus victus nullam sperare salutem" - The one hope of the doomed is not to hope for safety.)
To: Liberty Valance
People should tune in and listen to what he's saying
He's telling the truth
To: White Bear
I heard him say during the Senate hearings that he was involved on the panel for the initial educational phase and was not involved in the drafting of the report.He resigned less than a month ago. The 142 page report wasn't written, argued over and published in under a month -- in fact, portions of the report were leaked even before he was nominated. Clearly it existed then, even assuming some changes since.
144
posted on
12/06/2006 2:53:29 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Liberty Valance
To: Arizona Carolyn
e sounded pretty approving of the report this morning.Best way to handle this. Thank them for their wise council, tell them you will seriously study their recommendations and you will impliment as many of them as possible. Then on your way to the private quarters, drop the whole thing in the trash bin.
146
posted on
12/06/2006 2:53:58 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
To: BeforeISleep
He sounds like a FReeper...
this is amazing.
c-span2
147
posted on
12/06/2006 2:54:20 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: McGavin999
I hope that is what he does. I'm trying to keep an open mind about what is going on in the WH these days.
To: Liberty Valance
Mr. Smith goes to Washington...
To: Arizona Carolyn
He is saying the Baker/Hamilton report is a basically surrender. We need to confront Iranian Islamic Facists.
150
posted on
12/06/2006 2:57:15 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
To: Arizona Carolyn
151
posted on
12/06/2006 2:57:44 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
To: RodgerD
It's premature to say that Bush endorses this report or anything that's in it.
To: Liberty Valance
I agree with him.
Anyone know how we could raise $100million dollars so he can run for POTUS?
To: Alter Kaker
Maybe it did exist but that doesn't change the fact that he didn't write it. You are not satisfied with attacking Baker, you just have to pin the blame for this report on the administration by smearing Gates.
To: West Coast Conservative
155
posted on
12/06/2006 2:59:26 PM PST
by
Gritty
(Our victory in Iraq would be a greater defeat for America than Vietnam-Jihad Jaara, Al Aqsa Brigades)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Gates didn't give me a warm, fuzzy, feeling yesterday in his comments.
To: Alter Kaker
And what do you do .. slam the one ally you have over there
157
posted on
12/06/2006 3:00:19 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
To: Tailgunner Joe
You are not satisfied with attacking Baker, you just have to pin the blame for this report on the administration by smearing Gates.I'm not attacking Baker or Gates. I'm attacking the report, and I'm worried that the person or persons responsible for the report will be in a position to see it enacted. Baker's a private citizen, so I think he's not a threat. But Gates is not.
158
posted on
12/06/2006 3:00:22 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Mo1
And what do you do .. slam the one ally you have over thereFunny, I thought that's what this report did. Exactly how many democratic regimes friendly to the US do you see in the Middle East?
159
posted on
12/06/2006 3:01:22 PM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: Alter Kaker
When you want to stick to the facts .. get back to me
160
posted on
12/06/2006 3:02:34 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 241-247 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
