Skip to comments.
Navy rejects San Francisco for warship commissioning ceremony
North County Times/The Californian ^
| Saturday, December 2, 2006
| Associated Press
Posted on 12/04/2006 12:23:51 PM PST by DogByte6RER
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 last
To: HIDEK6
So their elections were fraudlent?
Touche!
121
posted on
12/10/2006 4:21:28 AM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: struwwelpeter
I asked because I noticed that Arleigh Burkes displace 9200 tons and are around 508 ft in length, almost the same as light cruisers during WW II. Ticonderoga-class cruisers looks similar to Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, in shape and size as well. What differentiates them?
The designations have been messed up since the 1960s or so. What we currently call a "frigate" was originally typed as a "destroyer escort" (basically a single-screwed ship somewhat smaller than a Destroyer used for convoy escort duty). In the late 1950s/early 1960s "frigate" was an unofficial designation used for ships called "Destroyer Leaders" that fell in somewhere between Destroyers and Cruisers.
When the WWII-era cruisers started decommissioning, the Destroyer Leaders/"Frigates" (Leahys/Belknaps and their nuclear cousins Bainbridge and Truxton) were reclassed as "cruisers" -- probably just as a means of preserving the type designation and their "captain"-level at-sea billets.
The Ticonderoga-class Aegis cruisers, such as the Antietam, were originally designated as Destroyers - and they were built using the same hull/machinery as the Spruance-class Destroyers and Kidd-class guided missile destroyers. They were reclassed as "cruisers" probably as a combination of their expanded capabilities plus the desire to retain the "cruiser" type after the decommissioning of the former Destroyer Leaders ... Confused enough now? It could be worse ... we could be discussing naming, rather than designation, conventions!
To: finnman69
Did Michael Moore walk across that bridge?
To: omega4412
Maybe the pro American elements would be better served in San Diego.Move south people their is no saving the san fransico $hithole. What is so damn hard about that?
124
posted on
12/10/2006 5:33:02 AM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
To: bondjamesbond
Sure,if the civialian control respects the military which in the case of that $hithole does not.Why spend money where you are not appreciated?
125
posted on
12/10/2006 5:38:12 AM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
To: tanknetter
I think the DD-21 Zimwalt class is even more fun.
It will have two 155mm guns in the first spiral. This is the equivalent of a cruiser. Some people have suggested that later ships will have mass drivers. These ships will be used for shore bombardment. That isn't a destroyer; it's a batleship or monitor.
Meanwhile the new Littoral Combat ship, at least in anti-submarine configurations looks like a frigate to me.
126
posted on
12/25/2006 1:52:32 AM PST
by
rmlew
(Having slit their throats may the conservatives who voted for Casey choke slowly on their blood.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson