Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RAAF gets giant new aircraft
news.com.au ^ | 4th December 2006

Posted on 12/04/2006 3:24:56 AM PST by naturalman1975

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: Mac1

You're thinking of the C-141 Starlifter, a much more graceful aircraft than the Globemaster.


21 posted on 12/04/2006 6:19:41 AM PST by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mac1
Re my comment about "graceful", this is what a "formation" of globemasters looks like.:

The Globemaster has such heavy wake turbulence that anything flying behind it would be shaken apart, so when they fly multiple planes, they have to be scattered across the sky to keep them from being damaged.

22 posted on 12/04/2006 6:25:18 AM PST by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
Sure is a lot better looking than it's namesake predessor:


23 posted on 12/04/2006 6:35:28 AM PST by NCC-1701 (To boldly go where no FReeper has gone before. Live long and prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

I heard on the radio this morning that Charleston AFB, SC is staging a 21-ship formation flyover of C-17s on December 21st.


24 posted on 12/04/2006 6:40:25 AM PST by CholeraJoe (Spork weasels ain't afraid of nuthin' but running out of sardines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Ping!

I don't know if this is within the scope of the aviation list.


25 posted on 12/04/2006 6:50:49 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

"The Globemaster has such heavy wake turbulence that anything flying behind it would be shaken apart, so when they fly multiple planes, they have to be scattered across the sky to keep them from being damaged"

So how did that work out with the C5 which is bigger?


26 posted on 12/04/2006 7:36:13 AM PST by Mac1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mac1

It's not the size. It's different aerodynamics. The C5 flies differently (different angle of attack, I think), so it creates less turbulence. Some of it may have to do with the C-17 being engineered for unimproved field landings, while the C-5 has to have smooth runways (nice long ones).


27 posted on 12/04/2006 7:39:50 AM PST by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NCC-1701
Don't forget the Original Globemaster - the C-74 from Douglas Aircraft (looked a lot like a DC 6 with a funky top-mounted cockpit)

And then the C-124 Globemaster II (AKA Crashmaster)

and now the Globemaster III, the C-17. Pics for all here
28 posted on 12/04/2006 8:47:37 AM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu; naturalman1975; COEXERJ145; microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; ...

If you want on or off my aerospace ping list, please contact me by Freep mail.


29 posted on 12/04/2006 8:53:52 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Karl Rove isn't magnificent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
I know this is a dumb question but how does the C17 compare with the C5A for size and payload capability?
30 posted on 12/04/2006 9:50:39 AM PST by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lx
Go to eBay, search for both planes, then click the 'compare' option. All your buying questions will be answered! ;>)

I know this is a dumb question but how does the C17 compare with the C5A for size and payload capability?

31 posted on 12/04/2006 10:02:44 AM PST by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Didn't Douglas make a civilian version of the C-74 ? Seems I recall Northwest Airlines flying something like it back in their Northwest Orient Days.


32 posted on 12/04/2006 10:05:43 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mac1
I guess the phrase "...in amounts never seen before" in the article refers to 'never seen before by RAAF'.
33 posted on 12/04/2006 10:06:58 AM PST by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cavador
If it's any comfort, I live in the US, and FR is the first place I hear a lot of our news.

People I know think I'm psychic because I'll mention a news story weeks before it makes the popular press...
34 posted on 12/04/2006 10:11:10 AM PST by null and void (To succeed in life, you need three things: a wishbone, a backbone and a funnybone. --Reba McEntire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Nope, the DC 6, which looks similar, was made into an airliner.

The C-74 was canceled after only 14 were made, but did participate in Operation Vittles, the Berlin Airlift hauling stuff from the US to Europe - so it does have a little piece of (mostly forgotten) history.

From elsewhere on the web

The C-74 supported the Berlin Airlift by flying cargo from the U.S. to staging bases in Europe, from which it was flown to Berlin in smaller C-47 Skytrain and C-54 (Note AKA DC6) Skymaster aircraft.

Experience with the Berlin Airlift demonstrated that the new United States Air Force needed a heavy strategic airlift capability. The fifth C-74 built was modified to be a prototype for the C-124 Globemaster II, which used the same wing and empennage as the C-74, but used a much larger fuselage.

This newer aircraft quickly superseded the C-74 in service. All of the surviving C-74s were scrapped in the 1960s and 1970s.
35 posted on 12/04/2006 10:12:50 AM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

"And then the C-124 Globemaster II (AKA Crashmaster)"

Better know as 'Shakey'


36 posted on 12/04/2006 10:14:05 AM PST by sargunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

One of my first airplane rides was on a United DC-6C. I remember the look of this airplane. Perhaps I'm mixed up a bit but didn't NW have another big 4 motor other than the DC-6 ?


37 posted on 12/04/2006 10:18:46 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sargunner

We used to ride our bikes out to D-MAFB and watch the C-124s try to take off in the summer heat. Sometimes they did, and sometimes, they did not.

The USAF type we talked to called 'em Crashmaster - I guess the brakes were not the best in the world..

Have heard of Old Shaky, Aluminium Overcast, and there may be other, more colorful ones out there.


38 posted on 12/04/2006 10:22:57 AM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
SuperConnnie? Lockheed Constellation and or Super Constellation.

A very pretty aircraft with 3 'tails' and used by the USAF as the EC-121, Warning Star - a RADAR picket platform.

Ike had a pair as a Presidential Transport. Killed by the -707, it was, IMO, one of the prettiest and graceful birds used by the USAF.

To be fair, depending on your circumstances, the AC-130H Specter is likely seen as the most beautiful A/C in the inventory today.
39 posted on 12/04/2006 10:30:22 AM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sargunner

Known affectionately by all who flew her,385,000 rivets flying in formation.

Had the wing of a B36 the engines of a dc7 and the inflight capability of engine repair. Feather the engine and 45 minutes later the extra engineer could climb down the hugest entry ladder in the world walk halfway to the rear down a hatch and another ladder open a pressure sealed hatch and crawl out and change plugs in flight inside the engines. held a flashlight for an an engineer on a 28 hour flight from Japan to HNl to Travis. Thought that mother would never land. No inflight refueling. Great aircraft stayed around a long time. replaced by the C131 Samaratan. looked like a stretched C130


40 posted on 12/04/2006 10:30:46 AM PST by straps (The problems with us republicans is, " We shoot our own wounded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson