Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The latest casualty: Detailed foreign news
The Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | 12/03/06 | Trudy Rubin

Posted on 12/03/2006 10:22:15 AM PST by Starman417

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Starman417

If ever there was a column in need of a BARF alert....


21 posted on 12/03/2006 11:24:45 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I'm curious. Has Trudy written one column extolling the courage of the men and women of our armed forces in Iraq? One column?


22 posted on 12/03/2006 11:31:59 AM PST by Krankor (kROGER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Trudy will look good in a burkah.


23 posted on 12/03/2006 11:35:19 AM PST by HardStarboard (Give Pelosi and Reid Enough Rope to Hang Themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
A burqa might show too much of her; she's clearly perfectly fit for the Moslem world and would no doubt fit in well. Obviously, she's not on our side.
24 posted on 12/03/2006 11:39:41 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Iraq: the next country Liberals want to abandon just before Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Trudy must be talking about the Al Jazeera reporters she gets her copy from.

They need to be arrested for working with the enemy. How many American soldiers have been killed while they stood watching with their Islamic buddies.


25 posted on 12/03/2006 11:44:20 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

"The media give aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States, rally their troops against us, and unite the American people in opposition to military measures necessary for victory."

So very true!!!!!! You can see it happen!! and you said...

"Because the few American media personnel in Iraq all collude and lack meaningful competition, the American people never will hear---"

But why? It can't be "just because they hate Bush".

I'm reading what SandRat is posting/pinging -- article after article of the positive that is happening in Iraq....

1. Leaders working toward security handover, dismantling al Qaeda in Iraq

2. Sailors save young girl's life

3. Iraqi Army, Coalition Detain, Kill Insurgents; Iraqis Killed in Suicide Attack

3. DoD Promoting Businesses Owned by Wounded Vets

4. U.S. Military to Boost Trainers for Iraqi Army, Police, General Says

5. Outdated Images of Detention Center, Mission Frustrate Guantanamo Troopers

6. Iraqis to Command Four Northern Divisions by February, U.S. General Says

7. Marine moms prepare Christmas gift packages for deployed soldiers.

the above from the last 2 days!!! Why is this being ignored! I can't understand.


26 posted on 12/03/2006 11:48:06 AM PST by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

Looks like Trudy had too much pig at the luau.


27 posted on 12/03/2006 1:34:28 PM PST by gotribe (There's still time to begin a war in Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Yet the same economic pressures driving mid-size papers to close foreign bureaus are also squeezing big papers; both the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune may soon be sold. Who knows how long these papers will maintain all their foreign outposts? Get your news from blogs? Those that comment on foreign affairs also depend on mainstream media for their information. With more newspapers closing foreign bureaus, will we soon depend on a shrinking pool of foreign correspondents to inform the whole country? Or will most Americans come to view the world through the prism of partisan bloggers who don't feel the need for facts?

This article is simply self promotion at the expense of the competition. Bloggers hate the MSM and the MSM hates bloggers. Why, because one is a legitimate alternative of the other. Blog commentary is by far superior to print commentary in terms of flexibility. There are no editors to filter out articles outside of a current or prospective readership. Blogs are not subject to space requirements. Newspapers require zero technical expertise. They are two very different animals that actually compliment each other - but that doesn't quell the mutual hatred. The core of this author’s argument is that the information of her media is superior to the information contained in other media. I don’t believe her. She is right about a corollary point. The fewer journalists you have, the fewer stories are going to get coverage. But the trade off is to do with career journalists who sacrifice tough questions for access. Bloggers produce far more information most of which is lower quality so skepticism becomes a part of the process of searching for information. It is harder to crosscheck an article in print than a blog so… I think I’ll stick to blogging.

28 posted on 12/03/2006 2:03:20 PM PST by humint (...err the least and endure! --- VDH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malia

Those seven stories all seem to come from what the press considers "unreliable propaganda" of their enemy (who incidentally defends to the death their right to print rubbish). None of them contain several Democrat/terrorist talking points, and none come from "reliable, unbiased sources" that we properly call our Islamofascist terrorist enemies. The media in Iraq collect and distribute enemy propaganda to us and espionage to the enemy. To take sides with the Americans or to oppose or question our enemies constitutes a breach of "journalistic ethics," the unwritten code that compels the press to collude in the collection and dissemination of enemy propaganda as irrefutable truth to the exclusion of anything reflecting reality. Incessant hawking of demonstrably false enemy propaganda, however, wins a Pulitzer Prize.


29 posted on 12/03/2006 4:45:10 PM PST by dufekin (media-Democrat-terrorist complex: espionage, sedition, propaganda, treason, and surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

"To take sides with the Americans or to oppose or question our enemies constitutes a breach of "journalistic ethics," the unwritten code that compels the press to collude in the collection and dissemination of enemy propaganda as irrefutable truth to the exclusion of anything reflecting reality. Incessant hawking of demonstrably false enemy propaganda, however, wins a Pulitzer Prize."

What you say is correct, however, it is more than just that!

The msm and the Democrats have something much stronger than the "I hate Bush" and goals of Pulitzer prizes campaign going. And the results are our men and women are dying because of it. That is unforgivable.

I can't figure out what to do about it!!!! So discouraging when you read all that SandRat puts up on FreeRepublic, so much good is happening - not only the good deeds but the war also has results. And so few are listening of know.


30 posted on 12/03/2006 8:23:53 PM PST by malia (President Bush - a man of honor!! clinton as President a man of horror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson