Nonsense, Dan Rather had the scoop.
Posted on 12/03/2006 3:03:26 AM PST by 8mmMauser
Yeah, I'm sure that Elian's father wasn't pressured in any way about what to say.
Except the body, of course.
Your statement that the police didn't find anything has no force because they didn't search thoroughly and effectively in the first place. You can't find anything if you don't look, y'know.
What the police said, roughly, was that they didn't find any furniture knocked over. Big deal. Michael was more than twice Terri's size. He could have handled her like a rag doll. He didn't have to knock over any furniture -- if indeed there was any furniture in the hallway and bathroom door, where she was found.
Suppose there had been some evidence of a struggle. The police didn't do forensic tests that could have determined whether Michael cleaned up any mess before they got there. That's why the lack of forensic testing gutted their findings.
The police, in short, did more or less nothing. And that is what you rely on in your judgments -- the same nothing.
Police generally aren't going to do a thorough forensic search unless there is a death. At the time, there was every hope that Terri would recover and anything could have been cleared up then.
Lucky Terri! All the law did for her was confine her to a windowless cell for years, embezzle her entire trust fund, and put her to a horrendous death by torture. It wouldn't even let her have Holy Communion.
It's almost more due process than a person can stand.
Nonsense, Dan Rather had the scoop.
If the most despicable child rapist-murderer on the planet was confined to a cell for two weeks and deprived food, water and religious sacraments, every human rights organization in the world would be up in arms and rightly so.
From the Florida State Constitution:
"SECTION 2. Basic rights.--All natural persons, female and male alike, are equal before the law and have inalienable rights, among which are the right to enjoy and defend life and liberty, to pursue happiness, to be rewarded for industry, and to acquire, possess and protect property; except that the ownership, inheritance, disposition and possession of real property by aliens ineligible for citizenship may be regulated or prohibited by law. No person shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion, national origin, or physical disability."
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?Mode=Constitution&Submenu=3&Tab=statutes#A01S02
Why bother saying so? I don't believe anyone in the history of the world has argued the contrary.
>> Thanks for posting this ludicrous writing.
You're welcome. I do hope you will read it. Amos doesn't make his points, as you do, by calling people "nuts" and "crackpots" or "ludicrous." He makes it from the founding documents and from constitutional history.
If the court would've ruled to dehydrate him, you would still be talking to the same cast of characters here.
I wonder why none of them are reminding us how "euphoric" being dehydrated to death is.
Amendment XIV
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
. . .
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
And yet nobody seemed to think that Congress had the authority to subpoena Terri to appear before a committee.
I told you to read. You sound like you don't know much and you don't know you don't know much. I am trying to help you so you sound like you know a little more. Make it easier on us without the sarcasm. You might learn something.
Are you trying to sound cute, calling me Mr. Knowledge? I am in no mood for game playing, so if you have a real point, make it.
You tell him MR. MAUSER!
That's a stumper. Do you suppose they tried being dehydrated to death and didn't like it?
But it makes a person look more "beautiful" than ever?!
They probably don't even know what you mean. That was a fact in the case.
Because Micheal was a deadbeat. Does that answer your question?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.