Posted on 12/03/2006 3:03:26 AM PST by 8mmMauser
Bush talked about the dignity of the individual, hitting hot-button issues including abortion and racial preferences. As one fan in the audience noted: He touched plenty of third rails, just to show that you can and still succeed. His comments about abortion and right and wrong reminded everyone of his principled support of life from Schiavo to parental notification and consent. He relished telling the tale of his move to dismantle racial preferences. And he stuck to his guns through several tough questions about immigration even though he knew it wouldn't please some of his audience.
If there was one issue that dampened enthusiasm for Bush among those gathered, it was immigration, where the former governor seemed to criticize conservative assimilation-policy tendencies. He lost half the room on immigration, one Beltwayer noted. But even with that, Governor Bush presented himself as a conservative executive - who governored as a conservative. As one attendee noted, Like him or love him (about the range of opinion in the room as far as I could sense), he's got charisma and stature and the oratorical skills of a natural leader. He's also clearly getting in fighting shape and has a smile that is as easy and natural as his deep south Florida tan.
Third Times a Charm?... Jeb Bush rallies conservatives.
8mm
Cynical politicians have manipulated the social right, through the meddling in the Terry Schiavo case, to the banning of gambling on the Internet. And a constitutional amendment defining marriage has helped transform the conservative movement, which was once about with the expansion of freedom, into "Big Christian Brother," which now is concerned with the expansion of virtue.
Snip...
Craig Shirley is the president of Shirley & Banister Public Affairs and author of the critically acclaimed "Reagan's Revolution; The Untold Story of the Campaign That Started It All" about the 1976 campaign. He is now writing "Rendezvous with Destiny," about the 1980 Reagan campaign.
Hmmmm. Will watch for it.
8mm
"There's Emerald City! Oh, we're almost there at last! At last! It's beautiful, isn't it? Just like I knew it would be! He really must be a wonderful wizard to live in a city like that!" But as all who've seen The Wizard of Oz know, Dorothy's initial opinion was wrong.
This classic tale for children is instructive, however, especially for those in Congress intent on extending federal funding of embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) beyond what the Bush administration has done. The funding balloon is inflated with promises of cures for diseases and new organs for replacement that defy research reality.
ESCR: It's Off to See the Wizard
8mm
Oz never did give nothin' to the tin man that he didn't already have.
"Principled!" Either K-Lo didn't notice that Terri was killed on Jeb's watch or National Review has joined a Bush personality cult.
Jeb didn't have the guts of a kitten. Those kids who tried to bring Terri water had courage. Jeb should have been first in the line with a glass of water for Terri. Imagine those cops arresting the governor.
Fantastic as it may seem, unlikely as it may seem, we could have conceived the crisis to unfold had Jeb been the man of faith he is portrayed to be.
I'm sorry, this is just very poorly written. It's more like an exercise in Oz trivia than an editorial about ESCs. Fine, use a solid example from Oz to make your point -- I did it myself once and it remains one of my favorite explications. But one example, please, not a dozen. Don't go flipping back and forth between Oz incidents and a dozen morals-to-the-story. That one good point, well argued, is what we're after; not a dozen that all get lost in the shuffle.
Those guys were smoking something funny :-)
In short, Terri brought landmark issues to the fore. And now we see otherwise solid, old-guard conservatives abandoning their principles and joining the ACLU-right to die-DNC pack hunt. Shame on them.
I can't recall a CPAC I'll be happier to avoid :-)
We certainly need more voices like Dr. Pasternak's. There is a good deal of information about Nazi doctors on the 'Net, but text and photos do not tell a story the way a man can. I hope some Freeper near Portland will be able to attend his lecture and give us a report.
Thanks for the info Pzenger.
Nobody seems to want to answer this question.
Deciding to kill one's family member is a hard choice for some, perhaps made easier by a new law.
Methinks this law just might have helped Mikey if he had been in Pennsylvania at the time. Looks to me like it may have saved him some unsavory juggling with compliant judges. Perhaps others will interpret it differently.
When Kay Iellimo was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in October, she didn't have a living will. But her family knew she didn't want to live hooked up to ventilators and struggling through chemotherapy treatments.
On Dec. 30, Iellimo, 74, died "beautifully and peacefully," with no attempts at resuscitation. The family had chosen her daughter, Sharon Panaia, to make the end-of-life care decisions for her.
Snip...
Today, a new Pennsylvania law governing end-of-life care decisions goes into effect. The law is designed to make the process easier on families and fulfill patients' wishes regarding life-sustaining measures. It seeks to avoid controversies such as the prolonged battle over the care of Terri Schiavo, who died in Florida in 2005.
Easing the way for hard choices
8mm
So many for so long here tried to show a conservative side of cheering on Mikey for his deeds. Perhaps it was equivocal enough for many to be convinced that maybe Mikey was really doing something good. For those still clinging to lingering wistful dreams, here is one more clear illustration of the far left position of Mikey, a position I prefer to just call evil.
Mikey takes his daily kos.
Also he begs for money.
...........................
Its almost two years now since Terris case and my life were front page news around the world.
It seems like just yesterday that right-wing radio shows and internet "news" sites were challenging the President and Congress to illegally inject themselves into my most private and personal decisions.
Everyone remembers what happened: they did.
And but for the courage of a few judges we all would have been witnesses to perhaps the most political and outrageous abuse of power. And if youre reading this you know the political fall-out from their self-righteous decisions..................................
I'm asking - What Now? Need your input (poll).
8mm
In an effort to reduce this occurrence, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is enacting a new law, beginning today, that gives certain family members more power than others.
The law, passed in November 2006, defines which family member is authorized to make medical decisions for a patient who is too incapacitated to make them, assuming that patient has no legal documentation defining his or her wishes.
The new law establishes a chain of command for surviving family members.
Law addresses end-of-life care
8mm
The American way of death has become a major public issue that goes well beyond the Schiavo case. No longer are life- and-death decisions made just by individuals and their families. Doctors, lawyers, insurance companies, politicians and judges have stepped into this highly personal arena.
As a society, we share an interest in determining what options are available, how they are accessed, and what rules are followed.
The Public Issues Forums of Centre County will host a deliberative discussion to help local residents talk about the question of what to do at the end of life.
Who should be making end-of-life decisions?
8mm
A noble nom. Do your friends call you Pete? :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.