WILL HILLARY CLINTON RUN? COMBINATORIAL GAME THEORY MAY PROVIDE THE ANSWER

hillary clinton, bill clinton | 11.28.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Coldwater Creek]

Mrs. Clinton has held positions outside the government.

Does the Rose Law Firm come to mind?

[Coldwater Creek]

Smart man, your husband!! The Hildabeast won't run.

[nopardons]

My husband is brilliant; thanks for noticing. :-)

[Coldwater Creek]

On another thread yesterday, a young unmarried woman had the idea that husbands were not a gift from God. She thinks that having a MBA was the best thing in life for her.

What a fool!

[nopardons]

What a MORON!

What's wrong with having both?

But, between the two, I'd take a good husband, any day and though not an MBA, I do have a Masters degree!

[gobucks]

Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a least squares curve fitter.

Ha!

My own Monte Carlo model using only 13 variables shows that multivariate analysis is more than adequate to predict the following:

Ms. Clinton is not Mr. Mondale. We don't have the Gipper, and thus, we don't have a good enough reason to have a great bonfire of Deomcratic dollars.

The ONLY reason to nominate her is to get the precedent set of nominating a woman from one of the major parties. She is quite unelectable, so what this means is that a sure win Republican nominee would have to appear. And that is just not possible in this Gipperless year.

Therefore, it will be a democratic man that is the nominee, and it will be someone Bill annoints, not Hillary. Here's a good question: just what men, for a change, does the MSM report Big Bill is being seen with?

Democratic money though seen as confetti, isn't, and won't be thrown away on her. At best, she wins a couple of primaries, but then she gets torpedoed by the MSM in a spectacular fashion if she doesn't back down.

But, she will back down, as she did when she sold her soul to her husband, way back in those classroom days at Yale. It will be an adequate excuse too: "My Mom is too sick, my daughter needs me," etc, etc"....

[Joe Boucher]

Maybe, but Mia sure knows her stuff.
This sin't the 1st time Mia t has nailed Mrs. Clinton and done it well.

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[Cincinna]

Great job!

Was Jeff Greenfield really fired from CNN?

[Wolverine]

bump

[Mia T]

My own Monte Carlo model using only 13 variables shows that multivariate analysis is more than adequate to predict the following....--gobucks

Your Monte Carlo simulation to iteratively evaluate the seemingly deterministic 'hillary-run' model by using sets of random inputs is quite brilliant; it is, indeed, the method of choice when the model is complex, nonlinear, or involves more than just a few uncertain parameters.

Your simulation will likely involve over 10⁴ evaluations of the model. I take it you have a decent computer.

By using random inputs, you have essentially turned the seemingly deterministic 'hillary-run' model into one that is stochastic. Bravo!

The ONLY reason to nominate her is to get the precedent set of nominating a woman from one of the major parties. She is quite unelectable, so what this means is that a sure win Republican nominee would have to appear. And that is just not possible in this Gipperless year.

Therefore, it will be a democratic man that is the nominee....--Ibid.

Missus clinton's elbowing and jackbooting and moneygrubbing her way to the nomination at a time when NO woman is electable confirms yet again the self-serving danger of the clintons.

 

It isn't that they can't see the solution. It is that they can't see the problem.

G. K. Chesterton

 

... While America appears not to be ready for a female president under any circumstances, the post-9/11 realities pose special problems for a female presidential candidate. Add to these the problems unique to missus clinton. The reviews make the mistake of focusing on the problems of the generic female presidential candidate running during ordinary times.

These are not ordinary times. America is waging the global War on Terror; the uncharted territory of asymmetric netherworlds is the battlefield; the enemy is brutal, subhuman; the threat of global conflagration is real.

Defeating the enemy isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. Condi Rice excepted, this requirement presents an insurmountable hurdle for any female presidential candidate, and especially missus clinton, historically antimilitary--(an image, incidentally, that is only enhanced today by her clumsy, termagant parody of Thatcher), forever the pitiful victim, and, according to Dick Morris, "the biggest dove in the clinton administration."

It is ironic that had the clintons not failed utterly to fight terrorism... not failed to take bin Laden from Sudan... not failed repeatedly to decapitate a nascent, still stoppable al Qaeda... the generic female president as a construct would still be viable... missus clinton's obstacles would be limited largely to standard-issue clintonisms: corruption, abuse, malpractice, malfeasance, megalomania, rape and treason... and, in spite of Juanita Broaddrick, or perhaps because of her, Rod Lurie would be reduced to perversely hawking the "First Gentleman" instead of the "Commander-in-Chief."

Mia T, 10.02.05
HILLARY'S COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF PROBLEM
(see descriptor morphs)

[Mia T]

He was MIA henceforth and forevermore. Don't think he was technically fired, tho.

[Mia T]

thanx, E.G.C. :)

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[stockstrader]

I will always hold it against Rudy that he did not run against Hillary this time. He could have done his party, his state and his country a GREAT SERVICE by removing her from the senate on November 7th.

If he had run and defeated her--he would have:
1. Kept control of the Senate for the Republicans,

2. While proving his electability for a Presidential run in two years, and

3. Most importantly, removed Hillary from Presidential contention.

He had a chance to hit a 'home run' where they know him best, where they love him, and where his liberal leanings are much more in-tune with the electorate--and he chose not to.

[Mia T]

fyi