Posted on 11/27/2006 2:59:40 PM PST by SmithL
"For the record, Lockyer is a cross-dresser."
I have a feeling he might also be a sadist / pedophile.
Yeah it's an old story around the Capitol in Sacramento going back to his Senate years in the early 90s.
State Treasurer isn't much of a jumping off point to successful runs for Governor. Angelides failed, as did Kathleen Brown 12 years ago. Not since Republican Friend Richardson in 1922 has a Treasurer made the leap to Governor. Prior to that, only Republican (and sole Hispanic to ever hold the job) Romualdo Pacheco previously held that office (but he became Governor as he was the Lieutenant-Governor), and that was from 1863-67.
Just one of the problems with ex post facto is plea agreements. Changing the conditions of the agreement in such a major way after the fact should nullify the contract.
They already have. Felons in possession law dates back to '68 at the federal level. Lautenberg amendment regarding "domestic violence" is more recent, but has the same effect for those previously convicted of "domestic violence" *misdemeanors*
I guess that won't happen with new Attorney General Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown.
Rose Bird's Revenge!
Jerry Brown is a little bit better. But, good point, we still have a long way to go to make sure that office is in responsible hands.
*shrug* Jessica's law seemed kind of stupid anyway. If CA law enforcement can't get half these pedophiles to register as sex offenders already, I fail to see why the pedophiles would keep a GPS tracker on their leg just because we tell them they should.
I'd support a CA proposition that lengthened the sentences for sex offenders, that would actually do some good.
You don't really expect the State AG to understand "ex post facto" do you?
Wonder how much Cali will spend getting those unconstitutional decisions overturned?
Lockyer,, the Whoreacle for Oracle...
You can't imagine how much of this "making law" happens in the courts even at the local level.
Also sex offender laws need to be dramatically clarified. An 18 year old dating a 17 year old girl shouldn't be labeled a sex offender.
You are absolutely right. It's classic Lockyer, he's worse than Stalin.
I agree that an 18 yr old dating a 17 yr old should not be labeled a sex offender, however, there is a thing called statutory rape. An 18 yr old *having sex* with a 17 yr old may qualify for that charge.
There are different classes of felony and misdemeanors, it would seem (and I believe it is so) that the difference in age is a mitigating factor in which class of crime the defendent is charged. There are also juries which will help to ensure that a person is not branded for life for a minor offense, and there is plea bargaining.
IMO, the requirement to register should only be placed upon people who have engaged in sexual activity with minors under 15 and more than 3 years younger than them or for non-consentual sexual assault or battery... but better yet, I would have a 2 strikes law for such offenders and for some offenses, like pedophilia, one strike.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.