Posted on 11/24/2006 11:46:36 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
"Sunni-Arab insurgents killed 215 people in an attack on Baghdad's Sadr City slum that intensified Shiite anger at the United States."
Uhmmmm... Thanks AP for your "reporting". We've had today already "articles" by this QAIS Al-BASHIR. Why are we now relying on ENEMY propaganda? The entire articles are smelling of anti-american bias. If we need FACTUAL reports on terror attacks in Iraq, we better should use the Multi-National Forces or CENTCOM reports as sources.
Regardless of AP bias, we should have taken Al-Sadr and his mosque out long ago. Fighting a PC war to appease the left is what got us into this mess..
Face it Iraq is a failure..as another poster said time to leave and helps the Kurds...keep forces in the area and bomb the hell at any suspected terrorist camps that pop up..but get US troops out now..
3000 US troops dead, 21,000 injured all for a WMD that wasn't near as active as we thought and trying to bring democracy to savage animals..not going to work
It was a noble effort but we fought a PC war with 1/3 of the troops needed
I play a little game now where I see how far into an article the MSM throws that tired "civil war" crap in there.
This one made it in the very first sentence.
Very good, AP. You're getting even more transparent.
Careful. You're falling right into the media's trap.
This is what happens when you try and fight a war without actually hurting many people, and being careful not to hurt anyone's feelings either.
but enough is enough..its been 3.5 years since the invasion..things seem to be getting worse or at least as bad as ever..
They're really not worse...they're better than they were in 2004. They're coming to a head. Most of Iraq is calm now. But there is a need for some changes in the leadership. I guess people learn lessons after a first-time election. I've heard so many Iraqis bemoan not having voted for Allawi's party now.
The media has been very successful in distorting the war to the people back home. I've watched them do it for some time now and it disgusts me. They've even been able to influence events here.
This is not a failure, we have not lost and pulling out now would be disastrous.
According to a website I just checked (disastercenter.com),the population of California was about 36 million in 2005 and the number of murders there was 2503. Comparing to Iraq ( about the same population ) terrorist killings are about the same as murders in that US state, aren't they? What would we do about California if the media daily and hourly reported the murder rate for CA.?
Nearly 4,000 Iraqi civilians killed in the month of October, with hundreds often killed in one attack; and one of the highest casualy months for Coalition forces ever. There is a civil war raging in Iraq and to deny that is akin to denying the nose on your face. The only thing stopping this civil war from being all-out mayhem on a massive scale is the presence of U.S. troops, who are trying bravely but vainly to stop the warfare between the shiites and sunnis.
Try nearly 4,000 Iraqi deaths in the month of October alone, and one of the highest death months for Coalition forces yet. All this inspite of over 140,000 of the best troops on earth trying to stop the violence. So comparing the Iraqi civil war with California's murder totals is a bogus comparison. But if your figures are correct, which I sincerely doubt, all that proves is that California is a war zone in and of itself.
Rumsfeld's fault./s
"But if your figures are correct, which I sincerely doubt"
Source: United States: Uniform Crime Report -- State Statistics from 1960 - 2005
In 1993 with a smaller population, the murder total was 4096.
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/
"Nearly 4,000 Iraqi civilian"
Were does that number come from!? The UN's 3700 dead + the last large attack? The UN number was denied by Iraq.
Even so the UN claimed that of those "civilians" ca. 500-700 were woman and children. The vast majority were military aged men. What are the chances that these "civilians" are insurgents, terrorists and militiamen? Pretty high I'd say.
Where are you getting your information? Where did those numbers come from?
{GASP!} Not the MEDIA! Well, that's irrefutable, then. < /sacr>
If there were a civil war going on right under my nose, I think I would have noticed it. The only civil war I've seen is the one in the media's (and their Democrat friends') fertile imaginations.
You keep on watching that media; I'll keep on watching from the 50-yardline. 'K? ;-)
Aw, come on! We all know what an upstanding, forthright assembly the U.N. is. They'd never lie, would they? And surely, they've never demonstrated any motive? {wink, wink}
Keep fighting the good fight. You make more sense than most people on this thread do. :-)
Civil War? Equally bad things are still happening in Algeria. But Reuters and AP don't have stringers there, milking every violent action and calling our attention to every person killed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.