Per Danny's comments below, all the stories on the home page carry Joel Lyden's byline including http://www.israelnewsagency.com/wikipediacensorshiplibelslanderisrael880512.html, so I'm guessing this is as described: editorial masquerading as a news service. Functionally indistinguishable from a blog, in other words, and carrying at least some highly questionable content. Deleted articles as created were self-evident spam. Just zis Guy you know? 10:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Israel News Service does convey the impression of being a low-budget blog masquerading as a news service, written by somebody with an excessive sense of grandeur
Reads more like a hit piece than any kind of credible journalism. I'd be skeptical.
That makes it about a thousand times better than the New York Times, for example. The NYT is wrong all the time and sometimes never issues corrections. What did Duranty win the Pulitzer prize for, again?
Wikipedia is a great resource for looking up some small bit of technical trivia about Eva, or checking what years classic NES games came out for a discussion about the graphics or length or which game ripped off which other, but would I ever consider it a serious political resource? Fark no.