Posted on 11/17/2006 7:41:22 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
I don't know enough about the rules, if any, governing Caging
to say whether it is proper for Otis to be a corporate officer
of MCDC, Inc.
"..I'm interested in page 6 of the Form 990, where it asks if any of the officers of the company are related to any of the companies listed in Part II, which lists the expenses including caging fees.
On the form, it says NO, even though some of the money seems to have gone to Maureen Otis' caging company.
Isn't that a conflict of interest, and shouldn't the question have been answered YES?.."
I guess you noticed that EV stayed away from this thread, unlike an previous thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.