Posted on 11/15/2006 12:12:55 PM PST by Liz
I agree. Keep the faith and stand proud because we are conservatives and have a vision for our great country, unlike the democrats. God bless and God speed with your excellent translations.
Absolutely!
They can always say that they voted for their conservatives because of what they said they would do. And of course, they don't know what they'll really do anymore than we know what ours will do.
The only thing we can say for certain is that these conservatives are new dogs with an uproven record.
Our "conservatives" have a proven record, and many are unworthy.
Hopefully we have cleaned out many of the unworthy but as a previous poster many clear, there are still plenty more.
Memo to Mr. Schumer: Pride goes before destruction.
The amount of weight one throws around dictates just how much damage he sustains when he hits the inevitable Wall.
Evad,
Again, you're right on the mark.
I confess: I wanted one f*g Senator to lose even if it means losing the Senate, Chaffee! What a smug, in-your-Repub./Conserv.-face ba$tard that was!!
How long did we have to kiss his a$$ and for what???
You don't need to feel bad for that one. If we had to lose, his leaving was a perk.
I'm trying to look at this in a positive sense.
It ain't easy...but I'm trying.
It's terrifying to have RATs in control during wartime but I'm hoping that the remaining pubbies and the Dog Dims will keep 'em in check. And, after all, the majority is razor slim in the senate..49-49-2.
I saw that list of dem senators and here is my thoughts on possible players to run against them:
Pryor - Arkansas versus Mike Huckabee (solid R)
Biden - Delaware versus ??? (move in from another state?)
Durbin - Illinois versus Mike Ditka (considered it before)
Harkin - Iowa versus ?????
Landrieu - Louisiana versus (some sports figure as political figures are idiots in that state!)
Kerry - Massachusetts versus Mitt Romney (not presidential)
Levin - Michigan versus Jeff Daniels (actor - no jokes pls)
Baucus - Montanta versus Marc Racicot
Lautenberg - New Jersey versus ???? (move)
Reed - Rhode Island versus ?????
Johnson - S. Dakota versus (former gov?)
Rockefeller - W. Virginia versus Rick Santorum (move in)
That's my 2 cents worth!
Hey Princess,
I have no problems with your picks. You correctly had problems with my state-picks because you didn't find conservative names for them which is exactly my point.
You can discuss your picks with the #140 poster. What I am saying is: there are some states that will not elect a Conservative Republican in my lifetime.
For our party's sake, I hope I don't have long to go!
Time to pull the same tactics the leftists have used against GWB's nominations and while doing so, remind the public that if it was fair for the rats to do it, then it's fair for the GOP to do it. Maybe we can get our own "gang of 14" together.
I am writing a book, about how to build a permanenta long-term majority, Mr. Schumer said
_______________________________________________________
"Mein Kampf" has already been written
Heheh----and so was "Daydreams of a New York Politician."
It looks like they're starting to do just that.
I do apologize and I don't want it back. I'll not even attempt to draw you into the fray any further.
Thanks anyway! :-)
Woohooooo!
I wasn't complaining!
Nah, they'll Murtha Alcee. But don't expect these folks to govern from the center-right, Liz. They lied to win the election. The agenda in DC will swing violently to the left,. no matter what these scumbags said at home.
Your take is very reassuring----centrist voters will soon know they've been bamboozled.
I'm sure Schmucky's colleagues will be thrilled to hear that all the money is now going to New York.
I still don't understand how some 'conservatives' hated Santorum so much for helping Specter that they were willing to let Casey won.
Ohoooooooooo! Is that what happened to Rick Santorum? And here I've been thinking it was excessive voter fraud in Philly and Pittsburgh!!
Takes some of us longer to get it than others.
Or, it could have been that Casey's agenda was completely unknown...or...it could have been that few voters really know next to nothing about much of anything....
I'll have to think about this some more and get back to you!
Nancee
Liz, the "centrist" voters are the same people who take up two lanes on the freeway, voted for Perot, went 50% for Kerry, elect Teddy, Murtha, Boxer, and Joe Biden, then shop in Wal-Mart wearing sweat pants.
Your faith in their ultimate redemption and their ability to figure this out is heartwarming. But next time you're in the Library, look at a 1955 Readers Digest, and then compare it to the latest issue. There's an awful good chance that our electorate has been dumbed-down past the point of being rationally analyzed.
I don't read the RD but I surmise it excerpts selected articles, while the info-world has been drastically altered by the i-net. Can't underestimate the power of the internet to deliver torrents of information in a nanosecod with a few clicks of the mouse. A dumbed-down electorate can also be attributed to liberal schools imposing NJEA-Planned Parenthood-type social change education, rather than basic learning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.