Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/14/2006 10:55:16 AM PST by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Dark Skies
This is too funny.

The man who was an unindicted co-conspirator in Abscam which means the FBI knew he was guilty but didn't have enough evidence to satisfy a grand jury for the indictment.

Let the games begin! I love watching Democrats eat their own.

36 posted on 11/14/2006 11:10:51 AM PST by carolinablonde (Proud member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
In this photo, John Murtha Launches the Conservative Web and Radio Talk Show Full Employment Act of 2006
37 posted on 11/14/2006 11:11:01 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

"I never had sex with that Arab, Sheik Mohammed"

38 posted on 11/14/2006 11:12:04 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Fight in the cloakroom! Get Murtha!!

Murtha! Murtha! Murtha!!!
40 posted on 11/14/2006 11:12:28 AM PST by kevinm13 (The Main Stream Media is dead! Fox News Channel and Freerepublic Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

"You can't do this to me!! Do you know who I am?? I served in Vietnam!! If I go down, I'm takin' all you @##$$%^&*()_+'s with me!!!"


41 posted on 11/14/2006 11:13:24 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
In that picture it looks like Murtha is holding his lips in so his false teeth don't fly out of his head and hit the desk.
43 posted on 11/14/2006 11:15:18 AM PST by 4yearlurker (I'm surrounded by Union Dems in the 12th district! Alone in the wilderness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
This is not how we restore integrity and civility to the United States Congress," Murtha said

If he wasn't so pathetic that would be comical. The first step is for Murthawi to resign from Congress.

46 posted on 11/14/2006 11:18:37 AM PST by jazusamo (Murtha still owes the Haditha Marines an apology-See DogMurtha.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

swift boat attacks = telling the truth.


48 posted on 11/14/2006 11:20:20 AM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Don't make perfect the enemy of the good)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
When it comes to our troops in Iraq, Murtha is a cut & run liberal.
When it comes to his turf in the house, he stands and fights.

Like the rest of the Dems, his priorities are all screwed up.

51 posted on 11/14/2006 11:22:04 AM PST by vamoose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

This is why this is going to be a fun two years.

You either stand for something, or stand for nothing, and the D party is a coalition party.

Everybody on their side knows this isn't going to last. They lied through their teeth to get elected, and it cost the press all of their credibility - for which they'll continue to pay dearly.

The credibility cards are beyond maxed already for them, and they haven't officially taken over yet.

Bush is going to get his judges, by the way.


52 posted on 11/14/2006 11:22:18 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
Murtha faces the horrifying reality of a character trait of Democrats. They will say or do anything, and ruthlessly crush anyone to retain power. He is a conspicuous liability in the eyes of an electorate sensitized to scandal. The long knives are out for his skin.
54 posted on 11/14/2006 11:23:15 AM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Let's just sit back and enjoy this.


56 posted on 11/14/2006 11:25:13 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Bush underestimated the Democrats ability to rewrite their history with MSM help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smoothsailing; Just A Nobody; Coop

Murtha playing nasty again.

Ping!


57 posted on 11/14/2006 11:26:04 AM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

(From writer Jerry Pournelle's website)

On Defeat in Viet Nam

Over the weekend I heard some radio talk show hosts talking about the US defeat in Viet Nam. This annoyed me enough that I wasted time sending them email, none of which received a reply, but it did cause me to copy the following out of Col. Harry G. Summers On Strategy:

…the North Vietnamese evidently believed that by spring of 1972 their strategy had succeeded. They believed that the United States was no longer capable of supporting South Vietnam. They then selected a new center of gravity – the destruction of South Vietnamese Armed Forces – and once again massed their forces to assume the tactical offensive. On 29 March 1972 North Vietnam launched what was to become known as the Eastertide Offensive. It becan with an armored attack across the DMV. Leaving two divisions on Laos and one as a strategic reserve, North Vietnam committed some 12 divisions – a total of about 150,000 men – to the attack on South Vietnam. Supported by tanks, heavy artillery and mobile antiaircraft units, they had some initial success. But they had severely miscalculated both the fighting ability of the South Vietnamese Army and the ability of the United States to react. As President Nixon said, “The bastards have never been bombed like they’re going to be bombed this time.” By July 1972, the North Vietnamese had reverted to the tactical defensive. Their attempt to mass had proven disastrous – again over 100,000 battle deaths.

Note that this was in 1972, and it was an invasion from the North, not some kind of insurgency or guerrilla warfare or civil war. This was flat out invasion by World War II sized forces, equipped with Soviet trucks and armor and ammunition; and the result was total defeat for the North (many fewer than 50,000 of those sent south ever got home again) and a total VICTORY for the United States and our South Vietnamese allies.

Why would anyone call this a defeat for the United States?

Because, of course, in 1975 the North did it again. Not an insurgency, not a guerrilla war, not a civil war, but a flat out invasion by more than 12 divisions, a World War II sized operation; and this time, instead of supporting our South Vietnamese allies, the United States, on orders from the Congress of the United States, did not give any air support and limited our materiel aid to twenty (20) cartridges and two (2) hand grenades for each South Vietnamese soldier. South Viet Nam accordingly fell, the United States bugged out with the pathetic scenes of escapes from the roof of the embassy and pushing helicopters off the decks of carriers to make room for incoming. We bugged out, and the Reeducation Camps, Boat People, Killing Fields, and other horrors began.

But we were not defeated. We withdrew on orders from the Congress. That wasn't defeat.

The last time we engaged in Viet Nam we, without our South Vietnamese allies, won a great victory.

Breaking an alliance with phased withdrawal is not defeat. It only feels that way. Perhaps it ought to feel that way -- but our troops were ready to engage the advancing North Vietnamese armored divisions. They didn't cut and run. They were ordered to stand down and watch the slaughter of their former allies and friends and soldiers they had trained.

God help us. God forgive us.



60 posted on 11/14/2006 11:29:58 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

May I say.......G-D BLESS THE SWIFT BOAT VETS FOR TRUTH


61 posted on 11/14/2006 11:33:05 AM PST by OldFriend (WEAKNESS IS A PROVOCATION, AN INVITATION TO OUR FOES TO CONFRONT US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
I say give them all knives, lock them in a small room for ten minutes, and the last man standing gets the position.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

62 posted on 11/14/2006 11:34:23 AM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

I WANT Murtha to be House Majority leader.

He's certifiable. Between him and Pelosi, the American voter will come back on their knees begging for Republican control.

Look at his picture. I wonder if the guy takes Aricept?


67 posted on 11/14/2006 11:36:25 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Murtha reminds me of an old sow we used to have in the barn. You had to hogtie her sometimes to get her to stay put, but the moment you gave her some slack in the rope, she bucked, kicked, thrashed and went crazy.


72 posted on 11/14/2006 11:43:35 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

The more I hear from this guy, the more I think it's a wonderful thing that Pelosi is doing!

Only the Dem's very best should be in leadership positions! LOL!


76 posted on 11/14/2006 11:51:52 AM PST by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies

Republicans are nice, aren't they? Mr, Murtha


78 posted on 11/14/2006 11:55:35 AM PST by dforest (Don't get fooled, the bigger struggle is still out there, and growing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson