Skip to comments.
Cintas puts workers on leave after it can't verify Social Security numbers (''no match'')
Mercury News ^
| 11/13/06
| Jesse Mangaliman
Posted on 11/13/2006 8:18:04 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: NormsRevenge
No jobs and millions of these DAMN INVADERS will deport themselves. They are here only for the money. And once the money is denied .....
21
posted on
11/14/2006 4:20:11 AM PST
by
dennisw
("For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks-- Matt. 12:34)
To: NormsRevenge
22
posted on
11/14/2006 4:34:15 AM PST
by
RaceBannon
(Innocent until proven guilty: The Pendleton 8)
To: bpjam
Gosh, it sounds an awful lot like that there union doesn't care if Cintas is a law abiding business.Why should they? Most unions aren't law abiding businesses thmeselves. And make no mistake, they are businesses.
23
posted on
11/14/2006 5:49:18 AM PST
by
Gritty
(For the Left, "treason" is little more than an alternative lifestyle, like transvestism - Mark Steyn)
To: NormsRevenge; All
PLEASE take the time to send a brief note to Cintas Corporation in support of their efforts to uphold our immigration laws.
Add to Subject line: ATTN: Richard T. Farmer, Chairman, Board of Directors, Robert J. Kohlhepp, Vice Chairman, Scott D. Farmer, CEO & President, and Wade Gates
info@cintas.com
I have nominated them as 'Patriot Employer' at wehirealiens.com.
And I have contacted Dim Bennie Thompson and informed him that our CURRENT immigration laws are to be upheld and enforced.
24
posted on
11/14/2006 6:41:51 AM PST
by
Kimberly GG
(Tancredo '08 www.firecoalition.com/www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com)
To: Kimberly GG
To: NormsRevenge
About 60 Cintas workers, labor organizers and immigrant advocates, rallying outside the East San Jose plant Monday afternoon, denounced the action.
Typical union scum. It's OK if the workers don't fulfill their contractual obligations, but if the company doesn't, they are evil, greedy, and need to be shut down.
Of course what would be great is if the company ignored the problem, and got shut down. Then all the workers would be out on their a$$es.
26
posted on
11/14/2006 8:27:13 AM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!)
To: B4Ranch
Had this been done nationwide a month before the election I think we would still have the majority in both Houses. Agreed! America is fed up with illegal immigration, and the Bush White House and their cronies refused to listen. If they want to win the '08 election they would be wise to get strong on enforcement and build that wall. Enough is enough!
To: elpinta
I WAS illegal once for a short while I must admit (1970). I needed medical care, but in those days WE paid cash for it, it was a 'code of honor' if you will: we didn't dare to milk the system that gave us jobs. Me and my buddies NEVER used the system, EVER. We paid cash for all our medical care and stayed out of trouble at all cost.
Which explains why few people cared much about it until (relatively) recently.
Given your unique perspective, what do you think the solution is NOW (if there IS one)?
To: RaceBannon
Any word on arrests?
--
not that I see..
I would more suspect the ones that get snagged will be deported,, eventually
29
posted on
11/14/2006 10:38:31 AM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... Cornyn / Kyl in '08)
To: NormsRevenge
Good for Cintas. Freepers who live near East San Jose should go and counter-protest these illegals.
30
posted on
11/14/2006 10:51:37 AM PST
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: beezdotcom
My perspective is simple: enforce the law!
Borders are borders, enforce them like all other countries do.
Hiring undocumented people is illegal now as it was then.
Felons are gone NOW.
Undocumented people are gone ASAP.
Cash flow out of the US needs to be monitored.
Free medical care is gone unless here legally or true ER issue.
Social services are over unless documented, legally here.
This is the US: there is an official language, use it.
End of the issue, but of course, there are incentives not to do that on the part of businesses, etc.
31
posted on
11/14/2006 12:07:28 PM PST
by
elpinta
(No tagline today)
To: Gritty
Why should they? Most unions aren't law abiding businesses thmeselves. And make no mistake, they are businesses.
Even worse, they are..(insert eerie music here)....Huge Corporations!!!!!!
32
posted on
11/15/2006 1:42:37 PM PST
by
bpjam
(Don't Blame Me. I Voted GOP.)
To: Gritty
Why should they? Most unions aren't law abiding businesses thmeselves. And make no mistake, they are businesses.
Even worse, they are..(insert eerie music here)....Huge Corporations!!!!!!
33
posted on
11/15/2006 1:42:41 PM PST
by
bpjam
(Don't Blame Me. I Voted GOP.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson