Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hold your nose if you have to, but please don't help the dems. They are not a loyal opposition. Don't stay home. Vote.


On April 29, 1975, hundreds of Americans and South Vietnamese were evacuated from Saigon (now known as Ho Chi Minh City), Vietnam, by helicopter. The following day the city was captured by the North Vietnamese, signaling the end of the Vietnam War.
UPI/THE BETTMANN ARCHIVE

While working as a journalist in Vietnam, Nayan Chanda took this photo of a Communist tank entering the presidential palace in Saigon on April 30, 1975. Chanda, now editor of YaleGlobal Online, will speak about his experiences there at a panel marking the 30th anniversary of the event.

AP
An anti-American demonstration in Tehran after Iranian students stormed the US Embassy in November 1979.

AP
The scorched wreckage of an American C-130 Cargo aircraft involved in the failed August 1980 attempt to rescue the hostages.

AP
Blindfolded and with his hands bound, an American hostage is led by young militants to a mob in front of the US Embassy in Tehran, Iran in November 1979.

1 posted on 11/06/2006 12:30:44 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: neverdem

This article sounds like the blathering of three FReepers who were recently banned by Jim R. from the PA FReeper board.


102 posted on 11/06/2006 7:47:49 PM PST by Ciexyz (Satisfied owner of a 2007 Toyota Corolla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
I held my nose and voted absentee last week--for Republicans. Well, I don't know about judges--if they had a high rating by attorneys, I voted not to retain them, but I didn't know their affiliation. However, I must point out that holding one's nose too long causes death by asphyxiation.

Here is notice: the GOP had better not even think of asking for any vote of mine in 2008 if they keep up the CFR/Part D/Immigration pandering/Deficit spending crap or if another Meirs is nominated, whether withdrawn or not.

103 posted on 11/06/2006 7:50:01 PM PST by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Its not a tough call. The Democrats stand for defeatism, higher taxes and Eurostyle economic malaise. If you loved the Jimmy Carter years, you'll positively adore the next two years under Pelosi and Reid. That should get you motivated to vote tomorrow. If you still don't care, Chuck Norris will roundhouse kick you into the voting booth.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus

106 posted on 11/06/2006 8:00:00 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

By no means is it a "tough call."

Vote or the filth will roll back into the nation's capitol... National Review has been a disappointment of late...


109 posted on 11/06/2006 8:51:00 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Tough Call ? I think not, put the dems and the news media together and it makes it easy to vote a straight Republican ticket.
115 posted on 11/06/2006 9:55:45 PM PST by sam I am
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This is a whole lot of hooey. Has there ever been a question as to whether you would go out and vote or not?


118 posted on 11/06/2006 10:02:45 PM PST by Cincinna (HILLARY & HER HINO " We are going to take things away from you for the Common Good ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; AGP; Angelwood; BillF; tgslTakoma; daughterofTGSL; Doctor Raoul; Exit148; ...
I voted to greatly expand the federal leviathan. I voted for less freedom. I voted Republican!

What else could I do?

*DC Chapter Short List ping.

125 posted on 11/07/2006 5:03:02 AM PST by BufordP ("Every morning I start my day with juice, toast, and a big bowl of Baby Crunch!" -- Michael J. Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Don't vote = Don't Bitch


132 posted on 11/07/2006 5:46:44 AM PST by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

My email to Derbyshire:

Grow up.

The 2006 Choice - By Cal Thomas
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/11/the_2006_choice.html

Conservatives who are upset that Republicans haven't done enough during their 12 years in control of the House and Senate and nearly six years in control of the White House need a slap in the face.

Republicans may have controlled all three branches of government, but conservatives haven't.

If conservatives believe enough has not been done to advance their agenda, let them work to elect more conservatives, not hand control of Congress over to a party controlled by far-left liberals who have no intention of moderating their tone or watering down their beliefs after the election.

One issue should trump all others for conservatives: judges.

As Manuel Miranda of Third Branch writes in Human Events, "If the GOP loses the Senate, precedent shows that more than 60 Bush judicial nominees will never get a Judiciary Committee hearing under the chairmanship of Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).

Republicans will be unable to stop a filibuster of a next Supreme Court nominee and countless circuit court picks. This will dwarf Democrats' past six years of obstruction."

Liberals have used the courts for decades to bypass the public will and impose a secular agenda on the country.

If they win control of the Senate, their current leadership will be emboldened to continue that practice.

Any judge who manages to make it onto the bench will most likely be of the judicial philosophy of Anthony Kennedy and David Souter. Republican presidents named both men because they thought it would be easier to win the approval of Senate Democrats. Neither turned out to be conservative, despite the White House sales job to conservative groups.

Then there is the war.

We live in a time when most people do not remember what a real war looks like.

Some are horrified that nearly 3,000 Americans have died in the Iraq War, but ignore that in World War II more than 407,000 Americans died. Sixty-two million were killed on all sides.

Some say this war is taking longer than that war.

That's because this war is different from that war in that it has no home state, unless we abandon Iraq. And the enemy accepts no rules for fighting it.

Democrats speak only of withdrawing American troops and of how our presence inflames the enemy, yet they have no explanation for what inflamed them before the war.

President Bush may have to change tactics, as he has said he is willing to do, but he understands the challenge. This isn't Vietnam.

This is a religious-philosophical war for control of the planet.

Anyone who thinks any objective other than the complete defeat and humiliation of these Islamofascists will deter them from their goal of world domination is self-delusional.

Last week over lunch, I asked Vice President Dick Cheney about conservative angst. He said in previous campaigns, "I would have given a lot to get an economy this good to be able to run on." Noting the recession that occurred right after he and the president took office in 2001, Cheney told me, "We (also) had 9/11. . We had Katrina, a war.

We had to spend a lot of money on the war and homeland security. And so a series of repeated shocks... to the economy and here we are, we've got 4.6 unemployment. We added 6.6 million new jobs in the last three years. Productivity is running at an all-time high. More Americans (are) working than ever before. Inflation is under control. . The stock market has hit all-time records.

What do you want? How much better do we have to make it before people say, 'yes, that's pretty good'?" It's a good question.

Is there anyone who believes government doesn't have enough of our money? Then vote for Democrats.

Is there anyone who thinks withdrawing from Iraq before the country can stand on its own against terrorism means there won't be more terrorism? Then vote for Democrats.

Do you prefer liberal judges reading their prejudices into the Constitution and increasingly depriving us of our right to decide our own future? Then vote for Democrats.

If not, conservatives should vote Republican and then work to continue advancing conservative goals. Those goals are more likely to be reached under Republicans than under Democrats.

That's the choice this year, a choice that will be made whether one votes, or cuts and runs out of a false notion that Republicans need to be punished for not doing more.

As the vice president said, "What do you want?"

Cal@CalThomas.com


135 posted on 11/07/2006 6:12:41 AM PST by Matchett-PI (To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
'KICK THE TAXRATS'

138 posted on 11/07/2006 6:37:55 AM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

143 posted on 11/07/2006 8:49:10 AM PST by Vision ("As a man thinks...so is he." Proverbs 23:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson