Posted on 10/30/2006 5:52:36 AM PST by ajolympian2004
---
The primary is where you volunteer and work for the candidate based on their beliefs as they relate most closely to your own. Once the general election comes around and you are a conservative you better be voting (R) in for example a Senate race... otherwise, like us idiots here in Colorado, you will end up sending a (D) Senator to Washington who will be voting with the far left most of the time... see Pete Coors vs. Ken Salazar in the 2004 Senate election here in Colorado two years ago.
You can let Mike know what you think about 'Why Party Trumps Person' here: mikerosen@850koa.com
Mike Rosen's weekly columns:
http://www.insidedenver.com/rosen
Mike Rosen's 850am KOA webpage:
http://www.850koa.com/shows/rosen/index.html
Mike Rosen in the studio furing a show earlier this year -
VICTORY Bump!
VOTE!
VOTE!
VOTE!
A single politician, no matter how good or how bad, will NOT take your guns away, cause paid abortions for all, raise your taxes, risk the nation's security, etc.
But a dem majority will. Never ever vote for a dem, even if he appears better than the repub opponent.
Amen Brother... Those conservatives that do not vote in this election will have to live with their decision. If the GOP loses and we are attacked they will be just as much to blame as the liberals.
The party has no responsibility to run palitable candidates? Throw all the insults you want, I'll never be a "Bend Over and Take It" Republican.
"The Republican coalition includes, for the most part, middle- and upper-income taxpayers (but not leftist Hollywood millionaires and George Soros), individualists who prefer limited government, pro-market and pro-business forces, believers in American exceptionalism and a strong national defense, social-issues conservatives and supporters of traditional American values."
I'm going to vote almost exclusively for Republicans, and would never vote for a Democrat. That said, how many different blocs of this coalition have been put off or even shunned in the past two years? Rather than trying to browbeat with constant party hackery, maybe a conciliatory gesture or two, towards limited government advocates and illegal immigration foes, among the many potentially disaffected but usually reliable Republican voters, would be in order ... heck, maybe even announce a broad initiative or two, for after the election, a "send us back to Congress, help us keep our majority, and ..." sort of thing. There's still time.
That's entirely appropriate. Myself, I would like to have the Republican party-liners frightened into line by the prospect of "Speaker Pelosi! Booga Booga!"
And the RINOs who stink too badly for us to be able to hold our nose and vote for them...they get a pass.
Never ever vote for a dem, even if he appears better than the repub opponent.
Absolutely. Some on our side just do not "get it".
Party over principle. Isn't that the reason Jefferson (La freezer money congressman) are winning their elections?
HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF A PRIMARY? That's why we have them.
Who brung who to the dance? Party leadership appears to believe that they did the bringing. We're about to find out.
In all the races that matter, primaries are generally won by the candidate anointed by the party.
That's one good reason why one of my senators is Liddy Dole instead of Jim Snyder. The decision to run Dole was made in Washington, not Raleigh.
In some ways the stakes may be even higher now then when this article was written in 04. Every election cycle the same choice is offered, a Constitutional "free market" Republic or a socialist\marxist state and sadly many of our fellow citizens chose the latter !!!
I think such thinking can only work for so long before voters simply no longer believe the party line, and let the chips fall where they may. I don't think that we at that point yet, but the Republicans have to start listening to the dissatifaction among the base, and make changes accordingly, no matter what the outcome is on November 7.
Palatable to whom? Conservatives only have a voice at the table in "one" particular political party, and it isn't the 'RAT party. The bigger the coalition of conservative voices there are, the more palatable to us will be the Rebublican nominees.
We are the ones who must increase our numbers by persueding people that we have the best ideas for governance and by helping them overcome the fear that DemocRATS have instilled in them about what we would do if elected.
Our numbers are growing - and when our numbers reach critical mass, the Republican party will have no choice but to listen to us more than the rest of those who also have a voice at the table.
Until then, we must be willing to do everything we can to keep the only one of the two viable political parties in power in which we have any voice at all.
Politics is the art of the possible. Those who don't want to hear that are either dictatorial mentalities, or naive. bttt
"For better or worse, we have a two-party system. And party trumps person. Either a Republican, George W. Bush, or a Democrat, John Kerry, is going to be elected president in November. No one else has a chance.
Not Ralph Nader, not the Libertarian candidate, nor the Communist, nor the Green. Minor party candidates are sometimes spoilers - like Nader costing Gore the presidency in 2000 - but they don't win presidential elections. Ross Perot got 20 million popular votes in 1992, and exactly zero Electoral College votes."
If Ross Perot can get 20 million votes, why can't John Doe get 200 million votes someday?
"A vote for Bush is a vote for the Republican agenda and conservative players in key posts."
It's also a vote for a prescription drug plan and a continued invasion by illegal aliens. It's a vote for Norm Mineta and Michael Brown.
We wonder why blacks continue to vote Democratic even though we think Dems do not help them. We wonder why Jews vote Dem even though Dems appear to not support Israel. Shouldn't we wonder why conservatives vote Republican even though Reps don't support conservative issues?
While the country has had a two-party system throughout its existence, it has not always been D and R. Either the R's will shape up or they will be shipped out.
While I will not vote for Menendez as New Jersey Senator, I haven't heard anything good about Kean, either. Someone else will probably get my vote. I am not going to vote against my long term interests.
I believe:
« that our government's most solemn duty is to keep its citizens safe.
« a vibrant entrepreneurial spirit will keep our economy strong and provide more opportunities for workers and families.
« that free enterprise and the encouragement of individual initiative and incentive have given this nation an economic system second to none.
« in building an innovative economy to compete in the world, because America can compete with anyone, anywhere, thanks to our entrepreneurs and risk-takers who keep us on the cutting edge of technology and commerce.
« in strengthening our communities, because our children deserve to grow up in an America in which all their hopes and dreams can come true.
« in protecting our families, and I respect the family's role as a touchstone of stability and strength in an ever changing world.
I choose strength over uncertainty, results over rhetoric, optimism over pessimism, opportunity over dependence, freedom over fear, and moving forward over turning back.
Finally, I believe that the Republican Party is the best suited to preserve, protect, and defend these ideals.
NordP
When Democrats ask for your vote on Nov. 7th...JUST SAY NO!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.